Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-24-2013, 05:48 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585

Advertisements

When the State trumps people, you get things like this...

Husband of pregnant woman wants her off life support - CNN.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-24-2013, 06:54 AM
 
Location: In a Galaxy far, far away called Germany
4,300 posts, read 4,408,773 times
Reputation: 2394
This law has been on the books in all 50 states until recent history. It has been challenged and successfully defeated in many states. Hopefully this will be Texas' turn to throw this terrible law out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2013, 12:30 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldawg82 View Post
This law has been on the books in all 50 states until recent history. It has been challenged and successfully defeated in many states. Hopefully this will be Texas' turn to throw this terrible law out.
I agree, it's a terrible law to have on the books.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 12:45 AM
 
Location: Riverside
4,088 posts, read 4,388,038 times
Reputation: 3092
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I agree, it's a terrible law to have on the books.
This Munoz guy's wife was 4 1/2 months along when she stroked out. It looks like she can be sustained until the fetus is viable.

It must be terrible to have his wife on life support for another 2-3 months... But isn't it worth it? I mean, doesn't Munoz WANT the child??? Didn't his wife?

The article mentions advanced directives, but doesn't really say if Marissa had one or not. I'll take Munoz's word for it that his wife did not want extraordinary measures, but I wonder what she would say in this case, where there is a chance to save her baby?

I realize Texas law is compelling him in this situation, which sucks. With his wife incapacitated, it should be his choice. But jeez... tough one. Interesting ethical dilemma.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2013, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,324,813 times
Reputation: 9789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
This Munoz guy's wife was 4 1/2 months along when she stroked out. It looks like she can be sustained until the fetus is viable.

It must be terrible to have his wife on life support for another 2-3 months... But isn't it worth it? I mean, doesn't Munoz WANT the child??? Didn't his wife?

The article mentions advanced directives, but doesn't really say if Marissa had one or not. I'll take Munoz's word for it that his wife did not want extraordinary measures, but I wonder what she would say in this case, where there is a chance to save her baby?

I realize Texas law is compelling him in this situation, which sucks. With his wife incapacitated, it should be his choice. But jeez... tough one. Interesting ethical dilemma.
I think her husband, more than anyone else, would know what she would have wanted. Whether it's "worth it" or not should be entirely up to him, not anonymous posters on a message board.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 08:14 PM
 
1,199 posts, read 734,644 times
Reputation: 609
Default Brain Dead Woman Alive because shes Pregnant

Texas Law Keeping Brain Dead Woman “Alive” Because She’s Pregnant

So I was hearing about this on the radio, and I thought, oh wow, that's a tough case. I can see both sides of the story. The law states that she cant be unplugged because of Texas state law (many other states also have a law similar to Texas) in order to protect the fetus. But at the same time, the wishes of the family and patient can not be executed. The other issue is, because the mother went with out oxygen for some time, there is a chance that the child will be born with certain defects that can effect quality of life, but it could also turn out to be completely healthy. So this is quite a tough conundrum

I just want to hear what CD has to say on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 08:48 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by cxr89 View Post
Texas Law Keeping Brain Dead Woman “Alive” Because She’s Pregnant

So I was hearing about this on the radio, and I thought, oh wow, that's a tough case. I can see both sides of the story. The law states that she cant be unplugged because of Texas state law (many other states also have a law similar to Texas) in order to protect the fetus. But at the same time, the wishes of the family and patient can not be executed. The other issue is, because the mother went with out oxygen for some time, there is a chance that the child will be born with certain defects that can effect quality of life, but it could also turn out to be completely healthy. So this is quite a tough conundrum

I just want to hear what CD has to say on this.

Medicaid, Obamacare, or neither?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 10:25 PM
 
1,825 posts, read 1,419,211 times
Reputation: 540
I think it is pretty disturbing that a state is willing to force medical treatment on somebody who doesn't want it because a bunch of morons in the state legislature know best.

I mean whats next keeping brain dead people alive against their wishes for organ harvesting because hey "its a life."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 11:05 PM
 
10,181 posts, read 10,258,599 times
Reputation: 9252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Egbert View Post
I think it is pretty disturbing that a state is willing to force medical treatment on somebody who doesn't want it because a bunch of morons in the state legislature know best.

I mean whats next keeping brain dead people alive against their wishes for organ harvesting because hey "its a life."
Who said anything about knowing what this brain dead woman wants, while she's brain dead and can't speak for herself?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 11:07 PM
 
1,825 posts, read 1,419,211 times
Reputation: 540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sawdustmaker View Post
Who said anything about knowing what this brain dead woman wants, while she's brain dead and can't speak for herself?
In the article it implies she made a living will. The only reason a person makes one of those is because they are contemplating this kind of situation and want to record their wishes, because they know if the time comes they won't be able to speak. Given that fact and the fact that her husband and parents all say the same thing I think its pretty clear what she wants.

Furthermore as far as the statute goes it is irrelevant. A person can spell out as much as they want that they don't want any life support in any form and the state will trump that if they are pregnant. So in essence Texas is saying we don't care what your wishes are if you go brain dead while pregnant, your body now belongs to the state so you have to be kept alive for as long as it takes to give birth.

Again. This is just 1 step away from allowing the brain dead to be used as organ storage, since the principle is basically the same.

Last edited by Egbert; 01-09-2014 at 11:20 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top