9/11 in 5 minutes (lawyers, Denver, insurance, financial)

[Hyperthetic]

Originally Posted by Fleet

The war against Iraq was not "illegal." Read up on the 1991 cease-fire agreement and resolution 1441.

Also, the two biggest suppliers of oil to the U.S. are 1. Canada and 2. Mexico.

Unethicality can rise to a level more reprehensible than "illegal".

Bush and Company were, and are, hyperunethical.

Doesn't have to be a "crime" to be a crime.

[Hyperthetic]

Originally Posted by Fleet

Speaking of fake, you should rephrase what you said above. WTC 7 was not "demolished under cover of the attacks." What is your source of that?

Yours, obviously, is the 48th story of WTC 7.

[Fleet]

Originally Posted by Hyperthetic

Unethicality can rise to a level more reprehensible than "illegal".

Bush and Company were, and are, hyperunethical.

Doesn't have to be a "crime" to be a crime.

The only thing that was unethical was Saddam murdering his own citizens.

But, of course, that was Bush's fault!

Was the 1991 cease-fire agreement (with Iraq) "unethical?" Or resolution 1441?

[Fleet]

Originally Posted by Hyperthetic

Yours, obviously, is the 48th story of WTC 7.

?

Do you believe those wacko conspiracy theories?

[workingclasshero]

Originally Posted by wall st kid

And, of course, Larry the Liquidator.

Larry Silverstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

uhm silverstein LOST money and is STILL losing money on the loss of the towers

[Mightyqueen801]

Originally Posted by workingclasshero

uhm silverstein LOST money and is STILL losing money on the loss of the towers

These are not people who have any sense of the commercial real estate industry in their own towns, let alone New York City. And in spite of all the "research" they claim to do (a/k/a reading Internet CT websites and not questioning or verifying a thing they read on them) they all seem to have missed the intense and complex details of the rebuilding of the WTC site.

The thinking is so simplistic and is coming from people to whom an insurance payout means that you drive your pickup into the levee when you don't want it anymore, report it as stolen, and get a check from your insurance company to spend however you want.

[Hyperthetic]

Originally Posted by Fleet

The only thing that was unethical was Saddam murdering his own citizens.

But, of course, that was Bush's fault!

Was the 1991 cease-fire agreement (with Iraq) "unethical?" Or resolution 1441?

Saddam was always a good soldier.

He always did what he was told.

And then he gets killed for it.

[Arus]

More Pentagon (there was a plane) evidence

9/11 Pentagon Attack Review - American 77


Aiprlane and concrete Debris covering the heli pad



More airline and concrete debris in front of the Pentagon



Witnesses who saw the airline parts identifying American Airline parts and their numbers


Witness DC 9-11 airplane parts, American Flight 77 - YouTube

[Fleet]

Originally Posted by Hyperthetic

Saddam was always a good soldier.

He always did what he was told.

And then he gets killed for it.

You should probably start making more rational posts.

Saddam was not a "solider," he was a murderous dictator who ordered torturing and murdering of his own people.

[CDusr]

Originally Posted by wall st kid

And, of course, Larry the Liquidator.

Larry Silverstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yeah. Buys in late July 2001, down in Sept. 2001. Just happen to go to the dermatologist that morning after how many years or days of eating breakfast there?

This looks dated, but interesting.
quote:
After the September 11 attacks, the United States Congress approved $8 billion in tax-exempt Liberty Bonds to fund development in the private sector at lower-than-market interest rates. $3.4 billion remained unallocated in March 2006 designated for Lower Manhattan, with about half of the funds under the control of Mayor Michael Bloomberg and the other half under the control of former Governor George Pataki. In April 2006, after several months of negotiation aimed toward permitting reconstruction to commence, Silverstein yielded some of his rights back to the Port Authority, in order to facilitate rebuilding at the site. Those negotiations resulted in Silverstein ceding his rights to building One (and its pro-rata share of the above-noted Liberty Bond funds) to the Port Authority, and allocating a portion of the insurance proceeds to the rebuilding of building One in favor of the Port Authority. In return, the remaining pro-rata shares of the Liberty Bond funds were allocated to Silverstein Properties for purposes of rebuilding the remaining buildings, and government agencies are expected to be among the tenants in those buildings.