Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes, Hillary will be made to look like some kind of hero, even though she was responsible for what happened there, she was more responsible for it than Obama was.
Just like when she kicked off her campaign on the idiot Barbara Walter's special, she was not asked a single difficult question. It's obvious that Hillary is the new Messiah of the liberals.
There you go! The conservative fascination with 'messiah'. Taken in context - Cruz must be the 'messiah' of the right. Well, I don't know. There was that brief, conservative bromance with Putin. Is he the messiah of the right?
The old lies about a Benghazi "scandal" didn't work in 2012, and won't work now.... but hey, it's good to see the RW talkers are still spewing.
Then ask yourself, if it "didn't work in 2012", why would the NY Slimes, a very liberal rag, bother writing anything about it? I mean, if it's all "said and done", what is the point in bringing it up again?
Really? Can you even coherently justify any of that without parroting the same Tea Party lines? Do you even know what murder is? Being upset is one thing, but Jesus Christ...
Sorry if the truth upsets you, but obama and killery are indeed murderers... They have black hearts, people dieing means nothing to them...
Oh, so two Republicans and one Democrat are "Congress" these days? Gotta love Fox's deceptiveness.
(I know more Republicans will dispute the NYT report, but Fox's story with that misleading headline is about a total of three Congressmen.)
Poor cons. Always having their big scandal of the moment fizzling.
And yes, witnesses who were attacked said attackers accused them of working for the people (Americans) who insulted the Prophet. Now I wonder just what they meant by that? What particular insult could they have referring to?
But of course you're displaying the typical echo chamber effect that liberals use to keep their pre-conceived notions from being questioned. People who support Obama and Hillary Clinton aren't going to announce damaging things about them. So people who announce damaging things about them must not support them. People who don't support them are just right wing liars, so what they say must be wrong. It's a neat little circle that lets you never be wrong. Anything said which does not coincide with the liberal's opinions is ipso facto biased and therefore can be safely ignored.
Then ask yourself, if it "didn't work in 2012", why would the NY Slimes, a very liberal rag, bother writing anything about it? I mean, if it's all "said and done", what is the point in bringing it up again?
C'mon, libs, do some thinking.
I don't know what libs would say, but there was this Centrist that said "Please continue Governor" ...
Sources for reporters aren't sworn in under oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth under penalty of law as they would to testify before Congress in a congressional investigation.
That doesn't seem to guarantee truth. Some still hedge, mislead, avoid the question, take the Fifth, or downright lie even when they do take an oath.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
