Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-31-2013, 12:54 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,459,826 times
Reputation: 4586

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
You have just described a small insurance pool run by your doctor. A small insurance pool with limited benefits and an in-network network of 1. It fixes boo-boos and doesn't address in-patient services of expensive care or operations
It depends on how it's set up. Even if it was to cover more expensive services, it would cut costs dramatically due to lack of overhead, bureaucracy, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-31-2013, 12:54 PM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,461 posts, read 7,087,596 times
Reputation: 11700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyperthetic View Post
You could replace health insurance with savings and prudent behavior.

Tax free investment accounts for your health insurance?

Maybe hospitals would also become more prudent.
I always thought that tax free accounts for health care and retirement were a great, no brainer idea.

They would be mandatory, however there would be a strict hands off policy so the government couldn't use them like its does SS for it's own personal slush fund.

Contributions would start at your first job and follow you from job to job throughout your life.
I would think a five percent minimum with no maximum would be smart, but you could only use it for health care or retirement .......however the money would never be taxed on either end and you would also be free to pass any unused money to your children or family, which would go directly into their accounts for them to use in the same manner

Any funds left when someone passes away with no relatives to leave the accounts to could go into a general fund to help those who's accounts don't have enough to cover needed care.

Yes I realize that sounds a little pie in the sky but I don't know why it couldn't be made to work, other than the fact that it makes too much sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2013, 12:55 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,743,804 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
You have just described a small insurance pool run by your doctor. A small insurance pool with limited benefits and an in-network network of 1. It fixes boo-boos and doesn't address in-patient services or expensive care or operations

OK, so any ideas related to the op? What would happen if there was no health insurance? Any ideas on how things could work without it on a large scale?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2013, 12:57 PM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,942,406 times
Reputation: 2385
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
If the injuries are minor, yes. Like I said, obviously this model would not work in all scenarios but it does shows how some doctors are getting away from insurance and thinking outside of the box. I'm sure there are a lot of other ways we could make healthcare work for people without insurance and that is the purpose of this thread. Figuring out how things would look without insurance.

Do you have any ideas that you would like to contribute, Chimeulojones?
absolutely not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2013, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,417,223 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
So if you become involved in a auto accident, do you go to your doctor's office to be treated?
Catastrophic plan to supplement the routine care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2013, 12:58 PM
 
13,954 posts, read 5,623,969 times
Reputation: 8613
What are the costs of other high demand items that are not insured?

There is no food insurance, but we all need food to live. How are food prices?

There is no water insurance, but we all need water to live. How are water prices?

We have car insurance for collision and liability, but we don't have insurance for gasoline, routine maintenance/repairs, and upkeep. How are those costs?

I do have homeowners insurance for catastrophic stuff, but not for new flooring, roofing, and other general homeowner costs. How are those kind of costs?

Prior to WW II, health insurance, for people who even had it, was for catastrophic costs and high risk occupations. Most people paid for medical services like they paid for electricity. You got the service, the doc gave/sent you a bill, you paid the bill. Hospitals worked the same way. You stayed, they took care of you, you got a bill with everything listed on it, and you paid it.

The post WW II anti-competition laws were what got employers into the health insurance as benefit business. It has done nothing but jack prices up ever since.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2013, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Philippines
1,961 posts, read 4,384,622 times
Reputation: 2781
Interesting information on the timeline of health coverage/health insurance:
PBS- Healthcare Crisis: Healthcare Timeline

interesting, it goes back to 1900s (before 1910):
Doctors are no longer expected to provide free services to all hospital patients.

America lags behind European countries in finding value in insuring against the costs of sickness.

Railroads are the leading industry to develop extensive employee medical
programs.

It goes by each decade. Definitely interesting link to read.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2013, 01:03 PM
 
Location: Philippines
1,961 posts, read 4,384,622 times
Reputation: 2781
It seems to me, health insurance costs have gone up because there are major changes in the medical field:

More medications to treat a wider variety of diseases/illnesses
Higher life expectancy
Improved technology for procedures, surgeries, etc.
Increase in Drs who are considered "specialists"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2013, 01:07 PM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,942,406 times
Reputation: 2385
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Catastrophic plan to supplement the routine care.
Catastrophic and routine are subjective. The OP is describing a very fundamental option. What does it cover? What can or will her Dr. do?

There is a world between routine care and catastrophic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Old 12-31-2013, 01:07 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,743,804 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian View Post
What are the costs of other high demand items that are not insured?

There is no food insurance, but we all need food to live. How are food prices?

There is no water insurance, but we all need water to live. How are water prices?

We have car insurance for collision and liability, but we don't have insurance for gasoline, routine maintenance/repairs, and upkeep. How are those costs?

I do have homeowners insurance for catastrophic stuff, but not for new flooring, roofing, and other general homeowner costs. How are those kind of costs?

Prior to WW II, health insurance, for people who even had it, was for catastrophic costs and high risk occupations. Most people paid for medical services like they paid for electricity. You got the service, the doc gave/sent you a bill, you paid the bill. Hospitals worked the same way. You stayed, they took care of you, you got a bill with everything listed on it, and you paid it.

The post WW II anti-competition laws were what got employers into the health insurance as benefit business. It has done nothing but jack prices up ever since.
Good points. Health insurance has dramatically increased the cost of care. Maybe it's time to dial it back. I can see the benefit to having catastrophic plans in addition to a cash system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top