Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-04-2014, 09:01 AM
 
Location: Somewhere extremely awesome
3,130 posts, read 3,074,467 times
Reputation: 2472

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teddy52 View Post
( regarding your first sentence )...............do you post similar remarks when every weatherman on the global warming band wagon points to hotter than normal weather to justify proof of global warming ?
Yes, I would - it's equally as silly of an argument. Heat waves have occurred... well... since forever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-04-2014, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,759,995 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharks With Lasers View Post
No, I understand the difference between weather and climate, and the concept of statistics. Using a cold wave to disprove global warming, or a heat wave to disprove global cooling, or anything of the sort don't understand basic science and probably shouldn't have graduated from 8th grade.
While I am in agreement with you, the bold is frequently seen in the media, at least here in the Denver area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2014, 09:15 AM
 
2,025 posts, read 4,176,333 times
Reputation: 2540
We are living in an interglacial period, and be thankful we are. Otherwise, we'd have not had the extra resources available to build a civilization that makes this debate even possible. I live right now in an region that was well covered in ice some short 7500 years ago.
The cycle deniers point to this year being "among the 5 warmest on record" or the sea ice being the 4th smallest on record....so that should tell you that we may have reached the warmer peak and we are heading back the other way. Or not. It's nature and it will do as it will. It has been warmer and it has been cooler and it will return to those states whether Canute shouts at the tide or not.
I used to believe the carbon/global warming theory, until I started some independent study. What I found was that we could turn the corner from interglacial to glacial in a span of decades, or possibly a decade, and while it's fairly easy to see what causes the shift to glacial it isn't as clear what causes the shift back.
If they has achieved the Kyoto goals in 1997, you can damn well bet the cycle deniers would be pointing to these atmospheric events they now dismiss as "weather" as proof they had saved the "climate".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2014, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,261,787 times
Reputation: 19952
Since the global warming doubters seem to use headlines as "scientific" proof of climate change rather than science:

NOAA: 2012 Hottest & 2nd-Most Extreme Year On Record | Climate Central

Barack Obama says the 12 hottest years on record have come in the last 15 years | PolitiFact

US roasts to hottest year on record by landslide | wtsp.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2014, 09:26 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,384,541 times
Reputation: 4113
Another avalanche of stupid from the deniers....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2014, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,324,813 times
Reputation: 9789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceist View Post
Another avalanche of stupid from the deniers....
What do you expect? They're FOX viewers.

Fox News found to be a major driving force behind global warming denial

American consumers of conservative media like Fox News distrust climate scientists and don't believe the planet is warming
The results suggest that conservative media consumption (specifically Fox News and Rush Limbaugh) decreases viewer trust in scientists, which in turn decreases belief that global warming is happening. In contrast, consumption of non-conservative media (specifically ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, NPR, The New York Times, and The Washington Post) increases consumer trust in scientists, and in turn belief that global warming is happening.
The study also examined previous research on this issue and concluded that the conservative media creates distrust in scientists through five main methods:
1) Presenting contrarian scientists as "objective" experts while presenting mainstream scientists as self-interested or biased.
2) Denigrating scientific institutions and peer-reviewed journals.
3) Equating peer-reviewed research with a politically liberal opinion.
4) Accusing climate scientists of manipulating data to fund research projects.
5) Characterizing climate science as a religion.
Media Matters provides examples of Fox News engaging in all five of these tactics.

Fox News found to be a major driving force behind global warming denial | Dana Nuccitelli | Environment | theguardian.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2014, 09:49 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,698,996 times
Reputation: 22474
I think instead of liberals trying to deny it's cold, they should be exclaiming this is proof their Obama is the Messiah. He's solved the global warming and now temperatures in some places are 40 to 50 degrees below average.

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/i...CxK_jOMm6WACAr
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2014, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,324,813 times
Reputation: 9789
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
I think instead of liberals trying to deny it's cold, they should be exclaiming this is proof their Obama is the Messiah. He's solved the global warming and now temperatures in some places are 40 to 50 degrees below average.

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/i...CxK_jOMm6WACAr
It's a shame you don't understand how weather extremes relate to climate change.
Oh well. It takes all kinds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2014, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,418,303 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
So the earth didn't exist before 1880?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2014, 10:01 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,198,461 times
Reputation: 18824
Talking about climate change with people that STILL think its measured by the latest weather forecast is a waste of time.

Moving on....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top