Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2014, 05:09 AM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,942,406 times
Reputation: 2385

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryWho? View Post
Killing someone for lying bears no semblence to lie detector tests or supposed constitutional infringements. If you think they do, you need a little reflection...
"Tossing someone in the river" was my hyperbole...

"Supposed constitutional infrinments" is just plain scarry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2014, 05:13 AM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,942,406 times
Reputation: 2385
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryWho? View Post
You can refuse a lie detector. I don't think that was an option at an inquisition.
Then why even offer anyone to take one? if your contention is not to require someone to take one...what is the point of this thread?

"Why dont they "give" politicians lie detector tests"? becasue the don't have to take one....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 09:14 AM
 
2,962 posts, read 4,998,484 times
Reputation: 1887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
"Tossing someone in the river" was my hyperbole...

"Supposed constitutional infrinments" is just plain scarry.
How's it scary? There are constitutional challenges every day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 09:15 AM
 
2,962 posts, read 4,998,484 times
Reputation: 1887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
Then why even offer anyone to take one? if your contention is not to require someone to take one...what is the point of this thread?

"Why dont they "give" politicians lie detector tests"? becasue the don't have to take one....
As a deterent. I think I stated that. If you know the stove is hot...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,167,094 times
Reputation: 2283
Default This is a picture of the last lie detector machine used on a politician

This is a picture of the last lie detector machine used on a politician.


Click image for larger version

Name:	Nuke.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	7.2 KB
ID:	123790
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 10:38 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,848,488 times
Reputation: 18304
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryWho? View Post
I'm watching Christie throwing all his pals under the bus while claiming he knew nothing. When the police suspect someone, they usually suggest a lie detector test. Why not do it with politicians? I'm sure it would cut down on a lot of nonsense.
Are you in favor of across the board lie detector testing for all jobs? There is clearly no problem with a politican lying; there are numerous examples of now easily they get by.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 11:06 AM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,935,420 times
Reputation: 3416
You really don't want your politicians to tell you the truth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 11:12 AM
 
2,962 posts, read 4,998,484 times
Reputation: 1887
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
Are you in favor of across the board lie detector testing for all jobs? There is clearly no problem with a politican lying; there are numerous examples of now easily they get by.
I think I might not have stated it clear enough. If they are presumed to be involved in a scandal, they should be given the option of a test. I don't condone widespread testing. It would have made my day if a reporter at that almost 2 hour, 94 question presser, would have just asked "Mr. Christie, would you consider being subjected to a lie detector test to support your innocence?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 11:13 AM
 
2,962 posts, read 4,998,484 times
Reputation: 1887
Quote:
Originally Posted by freightshaker View Post
You really don't want your politicians to tell you the truth.
Sure, I can handle it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
28,892 posts, read 30,266,067 times
Reputation: 19097
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRom View Post
Polygraph machines are expensive. The cost to replace one every time it was hooked up to a politician and caught on fire would be prohibitive.
polygraphs are also extremely inaccurate, they cannot read if someone is lying, all they do is measure heart beat and sweat....that's it, and b/c of that they are not submissable in court.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top