Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-17-2014, 05:02 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,380,829 times
Reputation: 4113

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
ID is not religion-based creationism.
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
The term intelligent design was coined, then intelligent design was substituted for creationism in the text of a book. In the process of doing that, there was a typo in which design proponents appears right in the middle of the word creationists. Intelligent design is just creationism renamed in an attempt to get a religious concept into schools as a scientific concept.

Of Pandas and People - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your statement is false.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, it isn't. Only the intellectually weak believe so.
Only the intellectually dishonest and the intellectually weak deny it.

Prior to the the claims of Intelligent Design ™ being a so-called "scientific theory" (which it demonstrably isn't), any concept involving the idea of some form of creator designer was a creationist/teleological argument for the existence of God. The agenda of the Intelligent Design movement of trying to rebadge creationism as 'science' so they could sneak it into the schools, was proven in the Kitzmiller v Dover case.


Please define what you mean by the term "Intelligent Design" or "ID" otherwise you just seem to be dishonestly moving the goalposts whenever you want.

Last edited by Ceist; 01-17-2014 at 05:29 PM..

 
Old 01-17-2014, 05:05 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,988 posts, read 44,799,475 times
Reputation: 13689
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
If you want him to refute something, just tell him what it is you want him to refute
I've done that. HistorianDude has FAILED to do so. Time and time, again.

You can answer this question, though... Do you dispute that humans have intervened in the evolution of dogs, cats, farm animals, etc.?
 
Old 01-17-2014, 05:07 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,988 posts, read 44,799,475 times
Reputation: 13689
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
I'm just confused since selective breeding can produce quite a diversity of breeds as dogs in a mere thousands of years, yet folks can't seem to grasp given hundreds of millions of years how an organism can turn out.
Intelligent design is present in the former. Why do you assume it must be absent in the latter?
 
Old 01-17-2014, 05:09 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,988 posts, read 44,799,475 times
Reputation: 13689
Quote:
Originally Posted by swerver View Post
Didn't he refute it many pages ago by pointing out that it's a self-published book, not a peer-reviewed scientific journal?
No. He never addressed the material presented. Attacking the messenger has nothing to do with analyzing the message.
 
Old 01-17-2014, 05:09 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,380,829 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
GuyNTexas and I.

That's what we've been trying to tell you. You cannot disprove ID by invoking ToE.
You are banging your head against the wrong wall over and over again.

It's fascinating to watch.
 
Old 01-17-2014, 05:10 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,110 posts, read 41,246,039 times
Reputation: 45135
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I've done that. HistorianDude has FAILED to do so. Time and time, again.

You can answer this question, though... Do you dispute that humans have intervened in the evolution of dogs, cats, farm animals, etc.?
What specific idea from the book have you asked him to refute? I've read the entire thread and not seen any.

Sure, humans have developed new breeds of animals. New plants, too. That just supports the Theory of evolution. We now know that the basis of evolution is genetics. So what?

That does not prove that intelligent design (creationism) is true.
 
Old 01-17-2014, 05:12 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,110 posts, read 41,246,039 times
Reputation: 45135
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Why do you assume it must be absent in the latter?
There is no evidence for it.
 
Old 01-17-2014, 05:12 PM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,320,820 times
Reputation: 9789
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD
Nope. 2 different things. I understand this just fine, you are the one having trouble. Adaptation doesn't involve genetic change as in creating a new gene, it is about the already present dormant genes expressing themselves. Evolution is when a NEW gene presents itself like the genetic code to evolve from a single celled organism to a multi celled organism. Single celled organisms don't have genes currently present that allows them to become multi celled just because the lake they are in dried up, that gene evolves over time for many complicated reasons and natural selection being one of them. SO, if evolution is present in everyday life, where is it? Where are the fish that are sprouting legs? Where are the primates that are walking upright? Where are the scaled animals that are developing feathers, etc.? The point here is that evolution has NOT been physically witnessed by anyone, only adaptation which MAY lead to evolution of that species in millions of years. Fossils aren't solid proof of anything regarding evolution. They could have just been a different species that didn't survive due to natural selection. The only way to tell for sure is through DNA which can't be attained through fossils.
Where are the primates that are walking upright? Well, posting on City Data, for one. Human beings ARE primates.
And yes, you can get fossil DNA. Look it up.
 
Old 01-17-2014, 05:20 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,988 posts, read 44,799,475 times
Reputation: 13689
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
What specific idea from the book have you asked him to refute?
All of it: the molecular biology, computational biochemistry, chemical thermodynamics, and information theory.

He has repeatedly FAILED to do so.
 
Old 01-17-2014, 05:24 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,988 posts, read 44,799,475 times
Reputation: 13689
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
There is no evidence for it.
There is no evidence against it. In fact, there's a substantial amount of evidence that intelligent design has intervened in the evolution of dogs, cats, farm animals, crops, etc., etc.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top