Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-16-2014, 06:56 AM
 
46,276 posts, read 27,088,282 times
Reputation: 11120

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
How would anyone have all the information on day one or week one. This report comes out 2 years after the incident with thousands of housrs of testimony and intelligence seeking and information.

You want this or any other President to have all the answers on Day one? That is just illogical, and simplistic thinking.

LOL...hell the youtube BS went viral in how many hours...............
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-16-2014, 07:02 AM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,941,561 times
Reputation: 2385
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
LOL...hell the youtube BS went viral in how many hours...............
I also remember seeing news reports that contained video of demostrations...that happend in Egyptian attack with the reports on the Lybian attack.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2014, 07:07 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,290,738 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
How is this news.

On 9/12/12 Obama called it an act of terror, the same words Bush used to describe what happened on 9/11/01. Did the senate think nuns did it?

The part about the admin's failure to bring the attackers to justice is a tad curios.
Does this committee think we should spend more trillions chasing bad guys?
Actually he characterized ALL the events that happened that day as terror acts.

BUT, he singled out Benghazi as a demonstration gone bad because of a video.

You might want to review what he said 2 WEEKS LATER at his UN speech
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2014, 07:19 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,290,738 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
How would anyone have all the information on day one or week one. This report comes out 2 years after the incident with thousands of housrs of testimony and intelligence seeking and information.

You want this or any other President to have all the answers on Day one? That is just illogical, and simplistic thinking.
"How would anyone have all the information on day one or week one.'

I will throw this back at YOU. How could anyone know it was BECAUSE OF AN OBSCURE VIDEO on day one or week one and week two?

If it was so early after it happened, why did they send Susan Rice out to declare so positively that it WAS because of the video?

To answer your question, they DID know the info LESS THEN ONE HOUR AFTER IT STARTED according to the general who testified

You may want to watch or read his testimony BEFORE continuing to ask questions without actual knowledge of what was said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2014, 07:20 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
Actually he characterized ALL the events that happened that day as terror acts.

BUT, he singled out Benghazi as a demonstration gone bad because of a video.

You might want to review what he said 2 WEEKS LATER at his UN speech
Based on the inf within the link the concept of the video remains plausible. MSM has been reporting that the ambassador failed to take action to protect the embassy and the pentagon was not in a position to respond.

It was a cluster funge.

I don't view the embassy employees more important than all the lives that have been lost because the US historically chose to put their troops in harms way because we have not been able to resist the opportunity to put our noses where they don't belong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2014, 07:27 AM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,844,197 times
Reputation: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
LOL!!! Please. You insult our intelligence. Don't try this, unless you REALLY want to get called on wanton dishonesty.
Apparently you haven't read the report.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2014, 07:36 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,171,483 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
"This"?

Where does he say "this"?

He doesn't say "this act of terror".

He says "no act of terror".

The reason he does that is because he doesn't want to say "this act of terror" because he's still pushing the bull *** youtube fairy tale and hoping to run out the clock on the 2012 election.


GREEN: Obama's incorrect 'acts of terror' assertions - Washington Times
Yeah, you are trying to hard to discredit what Obama said. When he says no act of terror, he is referring to this act of terror. You guys really get worked up over the most pointless things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2014, 07:37 AM
 
46,276 posts, read 27,088,282 times
Reputation: 11120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
I also remember seeing news reports that contained video of demostrations...that happend in Egyptian attack with the reports on the Lybian attack.
So that has what to do with youtube video?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2014, 07:40 AM
 
46,276 posts, read 27,088,282 times
Reputation: 11120
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Yeah, you are trying to hard to discredit what Obama said. When he says no act of terror, he is referring to this act of terror. You guys really get worked up over the most pointless things.
By the admision of the left numerous attackes were occuring....egypt...so, which one was being talked about....?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2014, 07:43 AM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,952,231 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
How would anyone have all the information on day one or week one. This report comes out 2 years after the incident with thousands of housrs of testimony and intelligence seeking and information.

You want this or any other President to have all the answers on Day one? That is just illogical, and simplistic thinking.
The Senate report and the transcripts of General Ham that were declassified on Tuesday prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that the administration KNEW THAT DAY what caused the attack.

You're just defending the indefensible and repeating propaganda, that's all.

So whether I expect them to have known on "that day what caused the attack" is irrelevant. They DID KNOW and LIED about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top