U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-22-2014, 05:20 PM
 
23,837 posts, read 20,289,662 times
Reputation: 9386

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Egbert View Post
Why should the state force doctors to show sonograms and read prepared speeches about abortion. Do doctors lose their 1st amendment rights when they put on a lab coat or scrubs.
Ridiculous assertion. Workers from all sorts of professions are mandated to make all kinds of disclosures as a matter of law. Do they lose their 1st Amendment rights by being required to make disclosures?

Your logic is very, very weak....if not completely invalid.

 
Old 01-22-2014, 05:27 PM
 
1,825 posts, read 1,241,040 times
Reputation: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Ridiculous assertion. Workers from all sorts of professions are mandated to make all kinds of disclosures as a matter of law. Do they lose their 1st Amendment rights by being required to make disclosures?

Your logic is very, very weak....if not completely invalid.
Logic so flawed a federal judge just struck down an abortion ban because of it.

North Carolina abortion rules struck down by federal judge - latimes.com

Do I like the idea of disclosure, yes absolutely, I think doctors should present all reasonable medical risks to patients about the procedures. Do I think doctors should made to read and show anti-choice propaganda because the state says so. No I think that violates the 1st amendment.

Last edited by Egbert; 01-22-2014 at 05:39 PM..
 
Old 01-22-2014, 05:40 PM
 
3,438 posts, read 4,879,134 times
Reputation: 5408
Not old enough to remember 6+ years ago ?
 
Old 01-22-2014, 05:42 PM
 
3,438 posts, read 4,879,134 times
Reputation: 5408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Can you back up your claims with some quotes?
Who I am referring to.
 
Old 01-22-2014, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,086 posts, read 12,322,788 times
Reputation: 9725
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Ridiculous assertion. Workers from all sorts of professions are mandated to make all kinds of disclosures as a matter of law. Do they lose their 1st Amendment rights by being required to make disclosures?

Your logic is very, very weak....if not completely invalid.
Except for doctors who know your foetus is abnormal and don't have to tell you. Reprehensible.

9 states have legalized malpractice against women. Arizona hopes to be the 10th. | Dr. Jen Gunter
 
Old 01-22-2014, 06:22 PM
 
14,007 posts, read 15,092,065 times
Reputation: 11856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teddy52 View Post
I'm ......educated.......enough that I don't have to " dance around" defending the actions of Democrats when the Supreme Court upheld the partial birth abortion ban !
then you would use proper medical terms. it is late term abortion not "partial birth abortion. you would also know that late term abortion is a necessary medical procedure and one not done because a woman changes her mind 7 months into a pregnancy
 
Old 01-22-2014, 06:40 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 13,415,567 times
Reputation: 5912
Quote:
Originally Posted by carnivalday View Post
Do we really need 55 million more people?
IMHO there'd be NO "55 million people more" since a LOT more people would be making damn sure that NO pregnancy happens if abortion was flat illegal.
 
Old 01-22-2014, 06:42 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 13,415,567 times
Reputation: 5912
Quote:
Originally Posted by hothulamaui View Post
don't want an abortion, don't get one. MYOB what a woman does you don't know or support is not your concern. neither is the reason for her choice.
Then a woman who "traps" a man in getting her pregnant also needs to be off the hook unless talking about bad stuff like rape.
 
Old 01-22-2014, 06:49 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 13,415,567 times
Reputation: 5912
Quote:
Originally Posted by American Heathen View Post
The one thing I have come to understand in battling baby murderers and their allies is they both are the lowest of the low when it comes to morals and responsibility. I refuse to get in a battle with their kind any longer as they don't deserve a chance to spew their hatred to try and justify murdering a baby and yes stopping a beating heart of ANYONE is murder and YES a baby at as early as 6 weeks in the womb has a beating heart.
Uh; MOST "pro life" people would NOT agree there if the pregnancy was because of rape, especially if it was a young girl whose body ain't ready to carry to term.
 
Old 01-22-2014, 07:09 PM
 
Location: Washington State
20,687 posts, read 10,640,368 times
Reputation: 17535
Horrific that we allow this and people do it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 AM.

© 2005-2020, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top