Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should a woman have the right to have the gay gene repaired?
Yes I believe in choice in abortion and gay gene repair 12 41.38%
No I do not believe in choice but yes to gay gene repair 6 20.69%
Yes I believe in choice but not gay gene repair 9 31.03%
No I do not believe in choice or gay gene repair 2 6.90%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-26-2014, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Maryland about 20 miles NW of DC
6,104 posts, read 5,987,639 times
Reputation: 2479

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
If you feel abortion should stay legal and it should be the choice of the woman then do you believe it should be legal and the parent's choice to repair the X chromosome that has been reported to cause homosexuality in men if that ever becomes an option?


If a genetic basis for homosexuality is established and further work is done to provide the technology for fixing the genetic code what say those who beleive GOD is a all powerful inerrant creator? GOD created mankind and made that very same genetic code. HE chose every bit of it and HE doesn't make mistakes or does HE. What will those of faith have to give up or question in our approaching brave new world , that GOD is the creator, that GOD is infallable or that GOD is turning over the future of mankind to mankind and no longer cares what we do one way or another. Also, will those who benefit or undergo genetic engineering no longer be his children and may over time cease to be in HIS image.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-26-2014, 02:28 PM
 
2,727 posts, read 2,832,514 times
Reputation: 4113
Can I throw out the possibility of aborting once discovering the pre-born baby has this 'gay gene?' Not bc I have an opinion on it, but just to sit back and enjoy the madness the thread turns into?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Richmond/Philadelphia/Brooklyn
1,264 posts, read 1,551,471 times
Reputation: 768
LOL a "gay gene" Some people on here are so stupid
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 07:35 PM
 
29 posts, read 20,801 times
Reputation: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
If you feel abortion should stay legal and it should be the choice of the woman then do you believe it should be legal and the parent's choice to repair the X chromosome that has been reported to cause homosexuality in men if that ever becomes an option?
Yes abortion should always be legal and available. Yes, if science advances to the point where homosexuality could be repaired, it would be the individual's choice as to whether or to have homosexuality repaired or not. I would say the same for left handedness and ugliness too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 07:37 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,465,757 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
If you feel abortion should stay legal and it should be the choice of the woman then do you believe it should be legal and the parent's choice to repair the X chromosome that has been reported to cause homosexuality in men if that ever becomes an option?
Yes.

[if she wants to manipulate eye color, then she should be able to do that, too]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 07:40 PM
 
Location: Laurentia
5,576 posts, read 7,995,214 times
Reputation: 2446
It's the woman's body, and she has the right to choose in all the areas mentioned regardless of popular opinion as to what choice she should make. The same principle behind a woman's right to choose applies in both of the OP's cases, but it should be pointed out that this topic falls under the heading of "liberal eugenics", not "abortion".

As an aside, scientists can only guess as to what natural factors determine a person's sexual orientation, so as of 2014 parents couldn't change or determine the sexual orientation of their child even if they wanted to. It would be a breakthrough if scientists even discovered how sexual orientation is determined in nature, let alone perfecting a process to alter it artificially.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 07:48 PM
 
7,723 posts, read 12,614,165 times
Reputation: 12405
It's not a "woman's choice" because it takes TWO to produce the baby. The mother AND the father. And the state goes after the father's money and he has to pay up for 18 years of the child's life when the stupid mother claims she doesn't make enough to support it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 07:49 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,377,437 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
If you feel abortion should stay legal and it should be the choice of the woman then do you believe it should be legal and the parent's choice to repair the X chromosome that has been reported to cause homosexuality in men if that ever becomes an option?
This is nonsensical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 07:50 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,672,493 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by pantin23 View Post
LOL a "gay gene" Some people on here are so stupid
Wouldn't that be the case if people are born homosexual? Are you saying it's a choice to be gay? Or learned? Or the result of environment?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 07:52 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,672,493 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceist View Post
This is nonsensical.
How would that be nonsensical? It's the mother's body isn't it? It's her dna to play with as she pleases if she could also just have the baby killed for any reason at all --- including having the baby killed because she thinks it has a gay gene. If she feels like "curing" the same baby instead of having it killed -- why not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top