Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-03-2014, 05:42 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,301,605 times
Reputation: 8958

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
35 hr work week to reduce unemployment


This ludicrous idea comes from the leftist logic that predicts that if you bail water out of the front of a leaky boat and pour it into the back, it will keep the boat from sinking.

Carefully ignored is the ffact that you must spend more overhead traininng more people to get the same amount of work done, set up more accounting, pay for more benefits packages etc., all while the employees bring in no more revenue than the reduced number of 40-hour rworkers did.

GREAT idea.
Leftists don't think. They are purely emotional creatures. They "feel." Logic isn't one of their attributes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-03-2014, 05:44 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
So What if we said we should have a 32 hr work week? Would it reduce unemployment?

So FDR had a large unemployment problem, and part of the 40 hr work week it appears was designed to resolve that issue.

France went from a 39 to a 35 hr work week to help with unemployment.

Looking at the numbers-it worked for us when we went to 40, but I am not seeing good evidence for it working for France when they went from 39 to 35.

However Germany has a 35 hr work week and its worked out pretty well for them.

Thoughts? Whats good for Germany is good for us? If so-why? If not-why not?
The overall average work week for private sector employment is 34 hours now.
Your FF workers are clocking in 25 hours.

And that is with current unemployment.

Might pay to do a little reading before coming up with grand ideas.

Table B-2. Average weekly hours and overtime of all employees on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector, seasonally adjusted
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2014, 05:44 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,542,326 times
Reputation: 6392
35 hours would be a big improvement for the welfare moochers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2014, 05:45 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,301,605 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
Which is only marginally better than the conservative logic of drill another hole in the boat and hope that the water from the first hole will magically go out of the second hole.
Huh? You'll have to explain that one. I know of no conservatives that use any such "logic." Example?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
OP, 35 hour work weeks already exist. So do 30 hour work weeks. It's between you and your employer. If that's what your employer wants and that's what you want... go for it. No reason to make some universal rule about it.
In their mind there is. It's called, "income equality." Or, perhaps it's "share the wealth."

Mostly it's "share the misery."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2014, 05:49 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
You are forgetting the huge increases in health insurance that each family and individual face due to Obamacare, which further stretches the budget of every man woman and child.

Working hours for most people have already been reduced to under 30, because of Obamacare.

Dividing the available work up among the available work force makes everyone equally miserable, and equally poor. That is the very definition of "income equality."
Each family?

Most propel work less than 30 hours a week?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2014, 05:52 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by totsuka View Post
France has tried it for years and it has failed. Why not

- eliminate workman comp. insurance. If the employee wants it let him buy it.

- eliminate unemployment insurance. If the employee wants it let him buy it.

- eliminate the employer paying into FICA tax. If the employee wants to pay more let him.
There is no federal law mandating Workers Comp. I believe Texas is the only state that does not mandate employers to maintain it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2014, 05:52 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Each family?

Most propel work less than 30 hours a week?
To read some MSM headlines you'd think that "most" Americans are working in McD's or Wallymart and they all had their hours reduced to 29 and now have to sign up for Obamacare.

Too many people just gobble up the headline and take it as the truth these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2014, 05:53 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
75% of Americans are currently living paycheck to paycheck.
This includes those making good money.

Reduce the hours and you'd cause more financial pain then we saw in 2008.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2014, 06:03 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post

Obama and Michelle, and all their minions, live in luxury, go golfing, take lavish vacations, etc., while average Americans worry about how to make ends meet working fewer hours and facing ever increasing grocery prices (compare the price of beef to only a few years ago) and other cost increases, such as gasoline, heating oil, gas, electric rates, almost anything you can name (as well as property taxes, for many people).

The majority of Congress is in the 1% club.
Polls rate Congress with a 13% favorability rating.. Despite this, most are re-elected. 13 ran unopposed. What 's up with that.

Fund raising for the party and one's own reelection is the top priority of state and federal politicians and those who aspire to become elected.

As an aside, beef is a comodity. The droughts caused the supply to be less than demand, thus the price of beef has increased. Washington is not responsible for the weather.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2014, 06:04 AM
 
Location: SC
8,793 posts, read 8,161,537 times
Reputation: 12992
I would consider putting off retirement if I had the same job with a 32 hour ww.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top