Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-13-2014, 09:58 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Doing the very thing that I said you do with the numbers proves my point.

All employer provided health insurance is subsidized, if we can't afford to subsidize these American's health insurance then we can't afford to subsidize anyone's employer provided health insurance.
how many times are you going to post the most asinine theories that an employer provided health insurance that you work for, is the same as a handout?

Do you really not comprehend the difference?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2014, 09:59 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by borregokid View Post
The Republican Plan which would have taxed the middle class much harder because taxes were repealed from the wealthy would have had an auto-enrollment feature which would have automatically enrolled people who were below the 300% FPL. You can see how much better automatic enrollment would be in increasing enrollment.

A Minor Surprise In The GOP Health Care Proposal | The Moderate Voice
oh just stop the retarded crap..

ACA is FULL of taxes.. How the hell do you think its paying to subsidize others?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 10:00 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,036,001 times
Reputation: 3603
Let me know Obamacare lovers when they actually release the numbers of who actually has paid. Then, maybe we'll be impressed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 10:01 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Yes employer provided health insurance is subsidized by the government. This is objective reality and is not a controversial or debatable point of view.
How many threads are you going to post these asinine comments on?

once again, government ALLOWING YOU TO KEEP your money IS NOT A GOD DAM SUBSIDY..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 10:04 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
Right.

So why not just get rid of every credit, write-off, subsidy, etc. and just tax every person, company, entity, etc. in the U.S. at a 17.5% tax rate.

If you make a dollar you pay $.18 cents in taxes to the government.

If you make $50,000,000,000 you pay $8.75 billion to the government.

Iamme73 is all for that, I'm sure...
According to Iamme73's math, that $8.75 billion to the government can only happy because they give you $41.25 billion dollar subsidy and allow you to keep whats left.. That government is so dam generous
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 10:06 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Huh?

You make no sense. Your income is not treated the same health insurance benefits for tax purposes.
Your income is an expense for the business. You not comprehending that isnt really something I'd be broadcasting..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 10:07 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,852,928 times
Reputation: 9283
Isn't that how much they we're suppose to have in the first month? How long has it been?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,163,062 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Huh?

You make no sense. Your income is not treated the same health insurance benefits for tax purposes.

That's the whole reason it is a subsidy and a tax expenditure.

The exclusion for employer-provided health insurance is far and away the largest tax expenditure. In part this is because it, like all such exclusions, reduces payroll taxes as well as income taxes; it is as if the worker never received the income it represents, although employers may deduct the cost of health insurance as a business expense. In contrast to exclusions, individuals’ tax deductions, exemptions and credits reduce only income taxes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
Who cares?

That's not true.

Perhaps an earlier post of mine in another thread from nearly a year ago will help clear this up.....

04-24-2013, 03:28 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
You're welcome to provide evidence to support any claim you make....the fact that you never provide evidence hasn't been lost on members.



Tax subsidies...."causes a substantial revenue loss, distributes these tax reductions very regressively, encourages an excessive purchase of insurance, distorts the demand for health services, and thus inflates the prices of these services."

“The Importance of Group Coverage: How Tax Policy Shaped U.S. Health Insurance.”

Source: The Importance of Group Coverage: How Tax Policy Shaped U.S. Health Insurance

2007 business deduction estimated at $4.8 Billion in
2007 exclusion from employee income estimated at $133.8 Billion

Source: Office of Management and Budget, 2009 Budget, Federal Receipts and Collections, Analytical Perspectives, available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/FY2009/apers.html

No, actually the data proves it is cheaper for both employers and employees to have health plan coverage than not.
Clarifying...

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 11:58 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Perhaps an earlier post of mine in another thread from nearly a year ago will help clear this up.....

04-24-2013, 03:28 PM

Clarifying...

Mircea
And it still isnt a subsidy..

If the employer wasnt paying for the insurance, they would be increasing the employees salary so the employee can pay afford insurance, and it would still be discounted as a business expense from teh employers tax returns and STILL not taxed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 12:06 PM
 
8,016 posts, read 5,858,077 times
Reputation: 9682
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
It seems so. The numbers are adding up..

Obamacare enrollment is up again | MSNBC
Awesome!

That means I'll see that savings of $2500/year on my health insurance premiums, right?

Wait.......what? That's not going to happen?

Dafuq?

Don't be a lemming, and don't believe everything that comes out of the White House. The vast majority of what they "report" as "facts" are actually lies and exaggerations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top