Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ah! Nothing but a dubious connection to the "Chicago corruption" thing. Guilt by association now becomes an "Everyone knows............Blah, Blah, Blah. Therefore it now becomes quotable fact. I should have known. that's how you guys operate. Tell a lie in one thread then quote it as fact in another. Bah! Humbug.
If there was a shred of corruption in Obama's past then the Clinton and Republican machines would have found it. Funny they all missed what you obviously found.
The corruption has been very, VERY well documented in multiple books, news stories, and some magazines.
That you would attempt to deny it is just amazing. It's as if you're willing to lie about someone else telling lies.
The winners in Chicago are the most corrupt. They are the ones most skilled at being a thug. Hillary's just plain wholly incompetent, even at being a thug.
Then you said "Obama got the (Nobel) award for his campaign speeches."
But according to the Nobel committee Obama got the prize "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. And Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Thanks to Obama's initiative, the USA is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges the world is confronting. ex.ex.ex."
Because she is a she. They knew that a certain percent of voters would not vote republican because Palin was on the ticket. If there were two women on the ticket, gender gets tossed. There are some people who would simply never vote for a woman. There are also some people who would never vote for a black man. They gave them a choice between the two knowing that a man will beat a woman every time. In short, it fit their agenda. It allowed them to push an inexperienced black man into the white house. I'm sure the puppet masters see his inexperience as an asset. It's much easier to control someone who doesn't know what he's doing.
I'm afraid you are very, very confused. Former half-term governor Sarah Palin was nowhere near the campaign when the Democratic primary voters chose Obama over Clinton.
It is a question that baffles many. Hillary Clinton was the golden girl of the democrat party in the 2008 election. She had been first lady, she had proposed universal healthcare under her husbands term as president and she was a senator from New York. But with all her alleged experience that she had that would make her president, according to democrats and the media, they decided to throw her under the bus for a inexperienced candidate who had zero executive experience making good policy, balancing budgets or even running a business. What was the true reason Hillary was thrown under the bus for a junior senator with zero executive experience?
Democrats War on Women.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.