Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-15-2014, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,479,246 times
Reputation: 18813

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
It doesn't surprise me in the least that liberals actually admire a woman having one son holding her almost naked breasts while she's got her rear end pressed up against the other son's crotch.
Where do you see "liberals" admiring the woman for doing this? I have read all the posts in this thread and did not see that at all. It's not my thing but if consenting adults want to pose like that then they have the right to do it. They have the freedom to do this which is something I thought all conservatives strived for. But I guess conservatives only want freedoms when it suits their agenda. Her kids are adults here not children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-15-2014, 10:37 AM
 
79,908 posts, read 44,064,775 times
Reputation: 17204
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
Where do you see "liberals" admiring the woman for doing this? I have read all the posts in this thread and did not see that at all. It's not my thing but if consenting adults want to pose like that then they have the right to do it. They have the freedom to do this which is something I thought all conservatives strived for. But I guess conservatives only want freedoms when it suits their agenda. Her kids are adults here not children.
Having the right doesn't mean I can't consider it icky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2014, 10:56 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,746,741 times
Reputation: 7019
Quote:
Originally Posted by FloridaPirate355 View Post
Proof?
You've been shown the evidence before and choose to ignore it. Why do you keep asking for something you don't want?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2014, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Virginia Beach
8,346 posts, read 7,030,547 times
Reputation: 2874
Icky?

Maybe.

Wrong?

Subjective.

Something to get outraged over?

Absolutely not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2014, 12:01 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,461,411 times
Reputation: 25806
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I'm not homosexual and I don't support anyone. Im fine with allowing two people who care about each other have the same rights as two others who care about each other.

The pics are icky.



Not my concern.
I'm with Pknopp on this one.

I happen to be pretty darn liberal and I found those photos waaayyy over the line. Who wants to present to the world the impression of an incestuous relationship with your sons?

As the mother of a son I say YUCK.

IF this was the manner of their upbringing at a young age, I would imagine their sexuality is ridden with angsts of all kinds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2014, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
2,171 posts, read 1,451,939 times
Reputation: 1322
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
Where do you see "liberals" admiring the woman for doing this? I have read all the posts in this thread and did not see that at all. It's not my thing but if consenting adults want to pose like that then they have the right to do it. They have the freedom to do this which is something I thought all conservatives strived for. But I guess conservatives only want freedoms when it suits their agenda. Her kids are adults here not children.
so because her children are not "children" anymore its ok.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2014, 04:45 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,461,411 times
Reputation: 25806
Quote:
Originally Posted by CinSonic View Post
so because her children are not "children" anymore its ok.
That is not what that poster said and you know it. HOW would you stop this photo shoot? I've said over and over that I do not approve.

However, IF all are adults exercising their free will - exactly what law would YOU pass to prevent this photograph?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2014, 04:50 PM
 
Location: California
11,466 posts, read 19,321,678 times
Reputation: 12713
Default Model Stephanie Seymour's incestuous "photo-shoot" with her two gay sons

I find it pathetic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2014, 05:03 PM
 
Location: Florida
33,508 posts, read 18,076,105 times
Reputation: 15498
The libs must love this.. we should be tolerant of this behavior. Same sex marriage, incest, and pedophilia. This is where tolerance is headed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2014, 05:17 PM
 
Location: In the Redwoods
30,286 posts, read 51,833,691 times
Reputation: 23660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beenhere4ever View Post
Soloman was a polygamist. Trying to get how rightwing groups would be against such a hallowed tradition.
I brought that up too, but not surprisingly it was ignored. So again I will say this IS representative of "traditional values!" Have the religious righties even read the Bible, or do they just preach about something they've never looked at before? I've read it many many times, and both incest & polygamy are rampant... not in a "this is a sin" way either, more like the opposite.

Last edited by gizmo980; 02-15-2014 at 05:33 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top