Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2014, 04:39 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,435,815 times
Reputation: 9074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
Get taxed on what you buy not what you make the fair tax

That's not fair because people with low incomes often must pay MORE for stuff than people with higher incomes, also because some favored classes would get to consume without paying tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2014, 04:42 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,435,815 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2tall View Post
Abolish income tax. Sales tax only.

Raw foods have no tax.
Prepared foods have regular tax.

??? Why on earth should someone who consumes less pay more tax than someone who consumes more?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 05:57 PM
 
5 posts, read 90,791 times
Reputation: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Absolutely! LEts be consistent!

Look if your idea of fair taxation is to tax the vast majority of what the poor buy and sell, but not the rich then you're not discussing fair taxation, you're describing a favorite method of taxation that hits the poor and middle class but not the rich.

A poor person wont fly to England to buy a watch, a Rich guy will fly to England, and buy a 500K watch...and not pay taxes.

A poor person buys his canoe at the local shop, a rich person goes to germany to buy his yacht.

etc etc

Your idea only works for those whose purchases arent worth the money for a flight overseas.

What do the rich buy? Investments.....

And you're going to compare putting your money into a savings account.....to purchasing shares ina company? Theyre NOT the same thing...but thats your argument?

My idea of fair is not to tax anyone's investments.

Investments are a risk, there is no guarantee of a return. So keeping them tax free or at least minimally taxed is an incentive to those risking the money to be more willing to take that risk. Investments help spur the economy and keeping them relatively tax free helps everyone, not just the rich.
For instance, what do you think would happen to the availability and costs of small business loans if the provider of these loans had to pay higher taxes on the returns?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 06:19 PM
 
26,445 posts, read 15,041,601 times
Reputation: 14599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
What would your share be if we had to pay off our Natianl debt?

The 1% would be saying the same of you.
Would you say some people's share of the national debt is a positive surplus of money? If they make a profit off of the federal income tax...isn't that the same thing...pay nothing in, get money back.


Quote:
Originally Posted by FloridaPirate355 View Post
The tax problem can be solved easily.

1-Throw away both the federal and state income tax.

2-Throw away the property tax.

3-Implement a sales/consumption tax of 10% on all goods and services (with food, medicine etc... Obviously being tax exempt). 5% of all tax revenue goes to the local state, the remaining 5% goes to the Federal Government.

4-The Government adheres to a strict budget. It is not allowed to borrow or spend more than it makes.

5- Watch the economy flourish.

Also under this system everyone would pay their fair share, especially the wealthy because there would no longer be loopholes for them to exploit with their income taxes.
I agree and you can even make the consumption tax progressive.

The Purple Tax Plan | The Purple Tax Plan
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 06:21 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,292,554 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dooleys1300 View Post
If you want people to take you seriously, you might want to think about laying off the bong before posting.

Just a thought.
Irrelevant, nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Taos NM
5,349 posts, read 5,119,119 times
Reputation: 6756
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2tall View Post
Abolish income tax. Sales tax only.

Raw foods have no tax.
Prepared foods have regular tax.
Sales tax has the same effect as income tax, except it gets regressive at higher amounts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 06:26 PM
 
7,413 posts, read 6,223,760 times
Reputation: 6665
Should be a flat tax across the board. However, give some kind of incentives for multi-millionaires and billionaires to give to those who are struggling. I'm not sure what that incentive would be.

I'm not in favor of higher taxes for the rich. If you've made it to the top financially, you shouldn't be punished for it, you should enjoy it.

Maybe a solution is higher sales taxes for certain products that only the rich purchase; like 30%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 06:30 PM
 
26,445 posts, read 15,041,601 times
Reputation: 14599
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
That's not fair because people with low incomes often must pay MORE for stuff than people with higher incomes, also because some favored classes would get to consume without paying tax.
You can make a consumption tax progressive.

Just hypothetical examples:

#1 All families get a monthly payment based on their composition. The payment would be set so those in and near poverty would equal their estimated consumption tax.

#2 Cars above $50K face a higher consumption tax rate. Homes above $400K face a higher consumption tax rate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 06:31 PM
 
26,445 posts, read 15,041,601 times
Reputation: 14599
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
That's not fair because people with low incomes often must pay MORE for stuff than people with higher incomes, also because some favored classes would get to consume without paying tax.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil P View Post
Sales tax has the same effect as income tax, except it gets regressive at higher amounts.
Not true. You can make a progressive consumption tax: The Purple Tax Plan | The Purple Tax Plan
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 06:33 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,582 posts, read 9,776,903 times
Reputation: 4174
Ah yes, the old "fairness" argument.

Always a hoot to watch people arguing this when they have no idea what they mean by "fair".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top