Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should the government get out of the marriage business
Yes 25 58.14%
No 18 41.86%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-16-2014, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,386,012 times
Reputation: 8672

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
What do you mean by "end[ing] marriage as a state function"?

Do you mean simply eliminating it, thereby eliminating the 1000+ legal rights conferred by it (such as spousal immigration visas, being allowed to live with your spouse in military base housing, having the right to sue for wrongful death in a court of law should someone negligently or intentionally kill your spouse, your spouse assuming the legal right of making emergency medical decisions on your behalf, your spouse automatically inheriting you assets if you die without a will, etc.)

Or do you mean we should simply rename civil marriage something else?
Yes. End any special treatment of anyone.

If you want a legal contract saying this person can make medical decisions and enter your hospital room. You are free to enter into such a legal agreement all day long.

 
Old 02-16-2014, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Plymouth Meeting, PA.
5,734 posts, read 3,252,087 times
Reputation: 3147
sure it can. any LEGAL document can as long as what is stated is in the confines of the law.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
A contract can't create many of the legal rights provided by a civil marriage (see post #7 for several examples). Those are legal rights only a government can confer.
 
Old 02-16-2014, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Plymouth Meeting, PA.
5,734 posts, read 3,252,087 times
Reputation: 3147
because you are taking an ages old institution and turning it on its head.

Quote:
Originally Posted by texan2yankee View Post
I don't understand how gay marriage would be "violating other people"? Would you explain?
 
Old 02-16-2014, 10:13 AM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,099,924 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by FKD19124 View Post
sure it can. any LEGAL document can as long as what is stated is in the confines of the law.
No it can't.

A legal contract can't confer upon me the right to sue for wrongful death in a court of law. A legal contract can't confer upon me the right to sponsor a person for an immigration visa. A legal contract can't confer upon me the right to live with a military member in base housing and shop at the commissary.
 
Old 02-16-2014, 10:16 AM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,099,924 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by FloridaPirate355 View Post
Seriously? You give me an article about an English guy threatening to sue the STATE CHURCH of England - you know, where there is no separation between Church and State.

Quote:
I don't care if gay people get married too much, but it's the mentality of the gay activsts that I have a problem with. It's' ' if you disagree with us prepare to be destroyed' '.
Why should I afford respect to somebody's "disagreement" with an inherent characteristic of me and be gracious when he seeks to deny me equal treatment under the law because of it? Especially when it's accompanied with statements like this: "Your perversion is an abomination to God. If we can't stop you from polluting society with your perversions, God certainly will." (Bideshi - post 34 of this thread).
 
Old 02-16-2014, 10:53 AM
 
15,063 posts, read 6,173,585 times
Reputation: 5124
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
Religion in marriage is an add-on, not an intrinsic function of the marriage itself. It's only the Christian right who has tried to conflate the two issues with their gay panic.
Regardless of what anyone believes regarding the origin of marriage, it is still far too intertwined with religion. The best move would be for the government to get out of the marriage business.
 
Old 02-16-2014, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,253 posts, read 23,733,496 times
Reputation: 38634
The government should not be involved in the marriage business at all.
 
Old 02-16-2014, 10:59 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,196,724 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by DivingBrown View Post
pure bigotry
If being opposed to perverted, immoral, godless behavior is bigotry, so be it. I am opposed.
 
Old 02-16-2014, 11:01 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,196,724 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post
The government should not be involved in the marriage business at all.
I am beginning to agree. My wife and I are married in the eyes of God and that won't change no matter what the government says.
 
Old 02-16-2014, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Vermont
11,760 posts, read 14,652,372 times
Reputation: 18529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
I am not that type.

So tell me. How do you tell the difference?

Now for me, look back on this forum on any marriage debate I've been in. I always say that marriage should just be ended as a state institution.

But if you didn't want to do that, how do you tell the difference between someone who is authentic libertarian on marriage, and those who do that as a means to hide their fear of homosexuals?
Maybe you are, maybe you're not.

What I can tell you is this: I'm sixty years old, and I've been engaged with and paid close attention to politics and political discourse for more than forty years.

Maybe there were obscure little guys writing in journals of political theory for all that time who wrote about how the government should get out of the marriage business, but it's a very funny thing. I never heard a peep out of any of them until getting government out of the marriage business was their answer to letting same-sex couples marry.

Coincidence? I think not.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top