Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She was probably arrested for petty larceny, which did indeed stem from not returning a video 9 years ago. However, since the warrant was issued and in the system, that's that.
The warrant in the system doesn't lay out the facts of the case, it's just going to say what it's for, what the bail is, if they'll extradite should she be detained outside the jurisdiction, etc. If it's a bench warrant 'cause she didn't show up the first time, then they can't just cite and release, she has to go before a judge...
Oh! pooh bear!! lets do better...what's your take?
My take is she was probably issued a summons to appear before the magistrate and ignored it, the warrant is probably for failure to appear and has very little to do with the video tape...
It's stupid that this happened, but it's even more stupid that the woman let it happen.
1. She "RENTED" a vcr tape.
2. She failed to return it.
3. It appears NUMEROUS attempts were made to contact her to get the tape returned.
4. It IS considered theft, if they issued a warrant, and it's in the system, she will have her day in court.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
