Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-21-2014, 12:44 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,779,270 times
Reputation: 4174

Advertisements

Is there anything the gun-haters AREN'T afraid of???

------------------------------------

Voter wearing pro-gun shirt turned away | kvue.com Austin

Voter wearing pro-gun shirt turned away
by Kevin Reece / KHOU 11 News

Posted on February 21, 2014 at 11:34 AM
Updated today at 11:34 AM

HEMPSTEAD, Texas -- Chris Driskill is a staunch supporter of the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. But this week he found out that his pro-gun support cannot be proudly proclaimed on his clothing if he wants to cast a ballot at the Waller County Courthouse or any other Texas voting location.

Driskill, employed as a private security guard in Houston, went to the Waller County Courthouse in Hempstead on Tuesday to cast his early-voting ballot in the Republican Primary. He was wearing a black T-shirt with a logo on the front and back that says “2nd Amendment – America’s Original Homeland Security.” "I heard a gentleman's voice over my shoulder say ‘he can't vote with that shirt on. You'll have to either turn it inside out our you'll have to leave,’” Driskill said of the polling place encounter.

Driskill says he thought maybe the polling place staff was either anti-gun, liberal, or over-reacting.


(FUll text of the article can be read at the above URL)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-21-2014, 12:51 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,779,270 times
Reputation: 4174
Sort of like throwing a woman out of the polls, because her act of voting is a visible demonstration of support for the 19th amendment.

Can these people get any crazier?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 01:06 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,180 posts, read 19,449,121 times
Reputation: 5297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Sort of like throwing a woman out of the polls, because her act of voting is a visible demonstration of support for the 19th amendment.

Can these people get any crazier?
No, as the article said (which of course you left out) This is why he was removed

Quote:
But Driskill was not being stopped by supposed liberal, anti-gun election workers. He was being stopped by workers enforcing Texas Election Code section 85.036. The rule states that “during the time an early voting polling place is open for the conduct of early voting, a person may not electioneer for or against any candidate, measure, or political party in or within 100 feet of an outside door through which a voter may enter the building or structure in which the early voting polling place is located.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 01:08 PM
 
4,837 posts, read 4,165,843 times
Reputation: 1848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
No, as the article said (which of course you left out) This is why he was removed
I thought everyone knew this already? But blame the liberals!!! The ignorance of people is astounding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 01:12 PM
 
924 posts, read 666,941 times
Reputation: 312
Your own article states he was breaking state law.

Do you even read what you post?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 01:20 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,779,270 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
No, as the article said (which of course you left out) This is why he was removed
There was no measure on the ballot about the 2nd amendment, or any other gun issues.

He was removed because the more ignorant among us regard guns as a political issue.

In the same way, some regard the word "N I G G A R D L Y" as something to do with skin color or race.

They're wrong on both counts.

The man violated no laws and did nothing wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 01:22 PM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,189,163 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
No, as the article said (which of course you left out) This is why he was removed
The 2nd Amendment is not a "measure".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 01:29 PM
 
793 posts, read 1,419,034 times
Reputation: 422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
No, as the article said (which of course you left out) This is why he was removed
He wasn't campaigning or promoting any candidate, measure, or political party.

The ACLU should be all over this, but they are selective about civil rights therefore disingenuous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 01:31 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
There was no measure on the ballot about the 2nd amendment, or any other gun issues.

He was removed because the more ignorant among us regard guns as a political issue.

In the same way, some regard the word "N I G G A R D L Y" as something to do with skin color or race.

They're wrong on both counts.

The man violated no laws and did nothing wrong.
From the story:

The Republican Primary ballot includes a proposition asking for a yes or no vote on expanded support for the 2nd Amendment and the places where a concealed weapon can be legally carried.

Guess you're wrong on both counts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 01:32 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2tall View Post
He wasn't campaigning or promoting any candidate, measure, or political party.

The ACLU should be all over this, but they are selective about civil rights therefore disingenuous.
He was promoting 2nd Amendment gun rights. There was a measure on the ballot regarding 2nd Amendment gun rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top