Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So you think there were no Blacks, Asians or Hispanics living in the Suburbs in the 1960s?
There was housing discrimination in the 1960s. That makes MLK's statement relevant at that time. However, executives of ALL races were living throughout the Chicago suburbs in 1995 when Obama made his racial slur in the interview.
Obama's 1995 racial slur:
Quote:
"I think that whether you are a white executive living out in the suburbs, who doesn't want to pay taxes to inner-city children for them to go to school...
Why does Obama state that only white executives don't want to pay double taxes for their own suburban school districts and Chicago's district, too? Where does Obama present any proof whatsoever that all executives of any other race in the suburbs want pay double taxes to fund both their own suburban school district and Chicago's?
Obama singled out Whites in that statement because he's racist. He has a decades long history of being so.
There has been ample verifiable evidence posted in this thread that Obama: was a member of a racist theology church for 20+ years, considered the church's racist pastor to be a "close confidant," got married in that same racist church, and had his daughters baptized in that same racist church.
The relationship between Obama and Reverend Wright was intensely covered by the MSM in the lead up to the 2008 election. So was the theology of his church and the texts of his most offensive sermons.
Unlike you, the American people are able to tell the difference between different black men, and decided that they did not care. Obama is not Wright.
They went on to elect Obama President... twice.
You need a new hobby. Your countrymen have formally told you to go pound sand.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
So, again... Do you condone racism, or were you duped? Which is it, HD? Hmmm...?
Again, your inability to count higher than two forces you into the pathetic necessity of drawing idiotic false dichotomies that no thinking person can take with a straight face.
Nobody but a babbling cretin would imagine those are actually the only two options.
Last edited by HistorianDude; 03-03-2014 at 01:16 PM..
There was housing discrimination in the 1960s. That makes MLK's statement relevant at that time. However, executives of ALL races were living throughout the Chicago suburbs in 1995 when Obama made his racial slur in the interview.
Obama's 1995 racial slur:Why does Obama state that only white executives don't want to pay double taxes for their own suburban school districts and Chicago's district, too? Where does Obama present any proof whatsoever that all executives of any other race in the suburbs want pay double taxes to fund both their own suburban school district and Chicago's?
Obama singled out Whites in that statement because he's racist. He has a decades long history of being so.
Just because housing discrimination is illegal doesn't mean it has gone away. There is still housing discrimination occurring today.
Dr. King's message clearly went beyond the impact of housing. Dr. King's concern was segregating society along racial or ethnic lines. The social disaster Dr. King was referring to was that once this segregation occurs it leads to both sides to viewing their issues as separate. Dr King believed that we are tied together and needed to solve the problems facing our society communally.
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.
Obama statement is based on that same premise.
Everything you are saying about Obama statement could also be applied to Dr. King's statement. As an example why is that Dr. King only singled concern for white suburbs ringing the inner city? Wouldn't Dr. King also be concerned about Asian suburbs ringing the inner city or Hispanic suburbs ringing the inner city? After all even in the 1960s there were clusters of Asian and Hispanic communities outside the inner city. Shouldn't those forms of segregation along ethnic or racial lines also be a concern for Dr. King? Why then is it that Dr. King singled out white suburbs?
Yep he was re-elected but that's not much of an accomplishment when people have visions of sugar plums dancing in their heads... read SANTA. And we are dealing with a population that finds it too difficult to register to vote ... read LAZY OR INCOMPETENT, take your pick.
I know how sad it makes you feel to know that the majority of your fellow countrymen consider your beliefs regarding Obama to be puerile nonsense. I cannot help that.
I can only observe that anybody who genuinely believes that being elected to the most powerful position on the planet twice is "not much of an accomplishment" is so completely out of rational touch with objective reality as to warrant only deep sympathy.
The relationship between Obama and Reverend Wright was intensely covered by the MSM in the lead up to the 2008 election.
No, it wasn't. Colluding deceitful JournoList member journalists shut it down with their 'call them racist' offensive after they became incensed that George Stepanopolous asked Obama about it ONCE. I already posted the JournoList quotes on that:
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
On the JournoList Google Groups forum, Richard Kim of The Nation stated: "George [Stephanopoulos] is being a disgusting little rat snake," In response to Stephanopoulos's questioning about Obama's long-term affiliation with racist pastor Rev. Wright.
Again, on the group forum, Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his JournoList colleagues to detract attention from Obama’s relationship with racist Rev. Wright by deflecting the mainstream media with the 'call them racists' offensive. Ackerman wrote to the list: "who cares — and call them racists."
Michael Tomasky (The Guardian) also on the JournoList forum: "We need to throw chairs now, try as hard as we can to get the call next time. Otherwise the questions in October will be exactly like this."
There was an active collusion among several key members of the mainstream media to shut down any exposure of Obama's racism. It was exposed and is a matter of public record. How is it that you know nothing about it? Underinformed as usual, HD?
Obama's 1995 racial slur against Whites in an interview is even more evidence of his decades-long background of racism.
Quote:
They went on to elect Obama President... twice.
The uninformedand/or duped elected Obama twice. How's that working out for the country? The economy sucks, GDP had to revised 33% lower last year, treading dangerously close into slipping into another recession. Foreign policy is a disaster. Obama has a high job disapproval rating. Most Americans don't like Obamacare.
Which is it, HD? Do you condone racism? Or were you, too, duped by the JournoListers deceitful manipulation of the mainstream media?
Just because housing discrimination is illegal doesn't mean it has gone away.
Are you trying to claim that there were no executives other than White ones living in the Chicago suburbs when Obama made his racist statement in that 1995 interview? Prove that.
Again... Why does Obama state that only white executives don't want to pay double taxes for their own suburban school districts and Chicago's district, too? Where does Obama present any proof whatsoever that all executives of any other race in the suburbs want pay double taxes to fund both their own suburban school district and Chicago's?
Obama singled out Whites because he's a racist. He's been so for decades. That's his background. That's his history. JournoList member journalists colluded to hide that. There is verifiable evidence of them doing so.
I know how sad it makes you feel to know that the majority of your fellow countrymen consider your beliefs regarding Obama to be puerile nonsense. I cannot help that.
That a person disapproves of his job performance doesn't in any way mean they agree with your opinions or condone your remarks about his character or competency.
I disapprove of some of his actions and statements but imo he's a loyal U.S. citizen and a capable, decent, intelligent man. I always felt the same about GWB.
That a person disapproves of his job performance doesn't in any way mean they agree with your opinions or condone your remarks about his character or competency.
I disapprove of some of his actions and statements but imo he's a loyal U.S. citizen and a capable, decent, intelligent man. I always felt the same about GWB.
Did you know when you elected him that he had a decades-long history of racism? Or did the JournoListers' collusion manage to effectively dupe you, too?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
