Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The U.S. should have an HIV-positive Latino effeminate gay male for president, who also has a felony record and is a single parent to an adopted teenage son who happens to be raised in a gender-neutral environment and likes to wear skirts to school. Further, he must support legal on-demand abortion up to 9 months of gestation, euthanasia-on-demand, marijuana legalization, mandatory preschool from 12 months of age, the banning of tobacco products and football, and the changing of the Department of Defense's name to the "Department of Peace".
I would think so. I expect a string of "it's a first!" presidents in the coming elections.
It's similar to casting those commercials where you need someone male, female, white, black, Asian, and the ever popular "vaguely ethnic" whenever you show a group of people hanging out.
Considering that both Cruz and Rubio are amongst the possible candidates for 2016, do you think the fact they are not anglo would create any kind of controversy to GOP voters?
GOP? Lol, Cruz and Rubio are GOP. What a silly post.
Or if that Hispanic candidate were to be pro-amnesty for illegal aliens based on ethnic ties to them. Take a look at where nearly every Hispanic politician stands on that issue. Luis Guiterrez comes to mind just for starters with that typical tribal mentality that is not only racist but not in this nation's interest nor it's citizen's as a whole. He salivates over increasing the Hispanic population in this country so that they have more power politically and culturally. No thanks!
Kind of strange people look at skin-color, rather than policies. After all, President Obama said, "he was going to Fundamentally change America" most didn't listen. They even actually admitted to voting for him on skin-color alone, this shows no common sense.
Considering that both Cruz and Rubio are amongst the possible candidates for 2016, do you think the fact they are not anglo would create any kind of controversy to GOP voters?
Still focusing on skin color and ethnicity?
How about we judge people for their deeds, words and the content of their character, and not their skin color?
God no! I think the experiment called "the first black president" clearly proved that a minority president, any minority president being it black Hispanic, Jewish, Mormon, gay etc will have a divisive effect on the politics and his ability to effectively perform his duties. I am not against Hispanics, Jews, Mormons or gays but as a pragmatist I don't see having a president with a minority background as a value but rather as an handicap.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasdrubal
Considering that both Cruz and Rubio are amongst the possible candidates for 2016, do you think the fact they are not anglo would create any kind of controversy to GOP voters?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
