Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-15-2014, 09:44 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,856,573 times
Reputation: 18304

Advertisements

Always with government authority the worse enemy of an agency is itself.

 
Old 03-16-2014, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Missouri
4,272 posts, read 3,787,918 times
Reputation: 1937
If he would have gotten a Nationwide permit from the Corps of Engineers BEFORE he started construction, he wouldn't have had to go through all of this. If the permit was denied, there would be an explanation and a plan could have been developed to fix the design. Then he could have resubmitted the application.

The State Engineer who told him his design was OK no doubt told him to get a permit, that is basic stuff. If the engineer didn't, then shame on him.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 08:36 AM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,305,052 times
Reputation: 30999
Obviously a bureaucratic bungle on the epas part in this case but i wouldnt want to eliminate the epa on the strength of this one incident, letting industry take care of its waste products and we'll be back to flammable rivers and air thats unbreathable.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 08:43 AM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,005,733 times
Reputation: 5455
We had a pot bellied pig and were threatened with a thousand dollar a day fine.............I told em to shove their fine.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 08:45 AM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,005,733 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by jambo101 View Post
Obviously a bureaucratic bungle on the epas part in this case but i wouldnt want to eliminate the epa on the strength of this one incident, letting industry take care of its waste products and we'll be back to flammable rivers and air thats unbreathable.
I say **** on the EPA. Bureau bungle...........lol. The entire country is in that situation now. Big Bro needs to go.........and leave us alone on our property.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 08:55 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,555,443 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecstatic Magnet View Post
Let's abolish the agency that (half-assedly) protects our environment because some guy can't follow federal law.

Another brilliant and we'll thought out plan from the far right.
Or, let's support the agency that sticks its nose into the affairs of private citizens every chance that they get and try to extend their influence into areas that they have no authority to go into Use of private land).

Another brilliant and well thought out plan from the nanny state leftist supporters.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 08:57 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,555,443 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Good, because man has the history of destroying without regard to what they are doing to the environment.
Then abolishing the EPA should help the environment as any federal action always seems to fail.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 09:01 AM
 
279 posts, read 183,255 times
Reputation: 46
That's the role of any governmental agency: sticking its nose into affairs of private citizens so the environment doesn't deteriorate for everybody else. We don't have individual environments on our individual properties, unfortunately we all have to breath the same air and drink the same water. Thank God our rivers no longer catch fire and there is no more smog over all big cities.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjay51 View Post
Or, let's support the agency that sticks its nose into the affairs of private citizens every chance that they get and try to extend their influence into areas that they have no authority to go into Use of private land).

Another brilliant and well thought out plan from the nanny state leftist supporters.

Last edited by Rasputin2014; 03-16-2014 at 09:09 AM..
 
Old 03-16-2014, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,275 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15641
Quote:
Originally Posted by jambo101 View Post
Obviously a bureaucratic bungle on the epas part in this case but i wouldnt want to eliminate the epa on the strength of this one incident, letting industry take care of its waste products and we'll be back to flammable rivers and air thats unbreathable.
How did you arrive at that conclusion, the EPA is enforcing regulations already on the books if there is any fault it appears to reside with either the state or the property owner. You need to know what exactly the state approved to determine the issue.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 10:53 AM
i7pXFLbhE3gq
 
n/a posts
This story needs a lot more details. It seems like there's nothing more than a one-sided story by Fox that was then picked up and regurgitated by a bunch of right wing nutjob sites.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjay51 View Post
Then abolishing the EPA should help the environment as any federal action always seems to fail.
Why yes, things were awesome before the EPA. The environment was really doing great. No CFCs ruining the ozone layer, no polluted water, car manufacturers were slashing emissions and putting in catalytic converters, the air was smog-free, and companies and people definitely weren't dumping sewage into the ocean and spreading cancer-causing pesticides everywhere.

Personally I like being able to stand on my balcony downtown and clearly see mountains 50 miles away, as opposed to needing to wear a face mask and being unable to see more than a few blocks away. If you prefer the latter, I hear Beijing is great this time of year.

The biggest criticism of the EPA is that they kind of suck at what they do. Anyone who's been to a place like southern WV can see the environmental devastation that comes from companies being allowed to dump and pollute without consequence for decades. It's not at all surprising that a company managed to contaminate the water for hundreds of thousands of people. They've been doing it for decades. The only difference is last time it actually made the news.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top