Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-16-2014, 06:15 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,546,330 times
Reputation: 22474

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
LOL, the old "that's different". Too funny!

When we came to CO in 1980, there were plenty of immigrants, legal and illegal, here. The menus at the McDonald's in some neighborhoods were in English and Spanish. That is 5 years after 1975, BTW.

How does that make it OK for her parents to have done what they did?
In 1986 when they did that amnesty, there were an estimated 300,000 illegals living in the USA. I suspect it was significantly fewer back in 1975. It wasn't all that much of an issue back then.

Even then -- no one is saying the anchor babies with their nice USA birth certificates are going to be deported. Not until the 14th amendment is interpreted correctly.

 
Old 03-16-2014, 06:18 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,546,330 times
Reputation: 22474
This is more liberal hypocrisy -- while trying to encourage and reward *certain* illegals, those that will surely vote democrat each and every time, you want to crucify this woman for her parents coming here illegally. Only because you disagree with her views --- very much like Obama using the IRS to shut down opposition.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 06:20 PM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,782,926 times
Reputation: 4896
If she had a (D) next to her name, the right wing hate crew would be in a complete outrage with their pitchforks and torches demanding she and her whole family be immediately deported.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 06:21 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,425,253 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post
So now you have an issue with anchor babies?
My thoughts on anchor babies haven't changed - they are Americans -but apparently, based on replies here, right wing views do change and excuses are made when it suits them. "The left" isn't calling for her deportation - just laughing at the right wing hypocrisy.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 06:25 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,546,330 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
If she had a (D) next to her name, the right wing hate crew would be in a complete outrage with their pitchforks and torches demanding she and her whole family be immediately deported.
But since she has an R next to her name, the left is out in full force trying to discredit her with something her parents did a half century ago.

Again -- adult anchor babies aren't going to be deported. Illegals and the kids they smuggle in should be.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 06:28 PM
 
17,363 posts, read 9,189,828 times
Reputation: 11820
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
only republican ones..
Not just the "Republican" ones ...... the Black Republicans.
How low can they go? Lower than any would ever suspect.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 06:31 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,425,253 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
But since she has an R next to her name, the left is out in full force trying to discredit her with something her parents did a half century ago.
Of course Republicans would never try to discredit Obama for something his parents did a half century ago.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 06:32 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,919,495 times
Reputation: 3415
If this is the case then you liberals should be thrilled to vote for her for any office... Aint it great!!!!!!
 
Old 03-16-2014, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,635,662 times
Reputation: 9171
I don't understand why democrats are so consumed with starting threads about republicans, whom they claim to hate.

I liked what I saw of Mia, but I don't believe she's even running for office, so why the spew? As far as I know, she's nobody's darling. Not at this point. Maybe later.

But no, to Ds it's all about tearing down someone else instead of building up their own.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sxrckr View Post
Your link is from Mother Jones -- known leftist rag -- but as to the question, I'd ask her.
Oh, Lord, I'm glad I didn't click the link. I figured DU. lol.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Florida
77,013 posts, read 47,448,627 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
In 1986 when they did that amnesty, there were an estimated 300,000 illegals living in the USA. I suspect it was significantly fewer back in 1975. It wasn't all that much of an issue back then.
There were about 3.2 million illegals in US during Reagan's amnesty, so I am not sure where you get your 300K. You mean there were still 300K after the legalization?

Last edited by Finn_Jarber; 03-16-2014 at 07:01 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top