Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The real question is whether we would reciprocate. Or at least threaten to.
We both can reduce the world to radioactive waste a hundred times over.
What we should be asking is why chickenhawks are so keen on having Obama out of office to have someone who would destroy the world at the drop of a pin.
We both can reduce the world to radioactive waste a hundred times over.
What we should be asking is why chickenhawks are so keen on having Obama out of office to have someone who would destroy the world at the drop of a pin.
Well Obama has butting cutting our nuclear arsenal.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by All American NYC
Well Obama has butting cutting our nuclear arsenal.
Because more than 1,800 deployed nukes aren't enough to destroy the planet or is the feigned outrage here just RW backlash over cutting welfare payments to the MIC?
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber
Do you realize who made the comment? A russian Bill Maher wannabe. Should US react? Of course not. Grow up.
I think it was actually someone channeling Khruschev's meaningless "We will bury you" bluster.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.