Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why should a private citizen comment? Just because Sarah Palin finds it necessary to stick her nose in everything in order to prolong her 15 minutes and keep the cash flowing doesn't mean Clinton should.
Exactly. And you just know that if Clinton were to comment, the very same posters who are deriding her for not commenting would be deriding her for commenting. One thing you can say about the right wingers here--they are utterly predictable. And utterly idiotic.
When they are the heir apparent to run for the presidency for the democrat party, then yes, they should be making a comment.
You need to keep your pants on, she isn't even running yet. If this were happening in March 2016 then yes the opinions of the front runners from each party would be relevant. That is not the case today.
You need to keep your pants on, she isn't even running yet. If this were happening in March 2016 then yes the opinions of the front runners from each party would be relevant. That is not the case today.
Please, take off your blue blinders and open your eyes.
That's a pretty nice deflection, so I'm not sure what your point is...if there is one.
Right, just like how Christie might have been linked to a traffic delay became nation wide news for a week because he is just a governor of NJ and not going to be running for president.
If any media outlet finds her she will just fake passing out again like she did before she was supposed to testify on Benghazi. Liberals will of course give her victim status again and she won't have to make a peep........unless she wants to blame Bush or those old "evil" right wingers.
Exactly. And you just know that if Clinton were to comment, the very same posters who are deriding her for not commenting would be deriding her for commenting. One thing you can say about the right wingers here--they are utterly predictable. And utterly idiotic.
It seems like the media can't find Hillary, anywhere, to ask her about the Putin/Crimea issue. Or, is it that they aren't even looking for her?
"...the historic record shows Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, was in charge of rebuilding the relationship with Russia from 2009 to 2013. She was in charge of the reset. She was in charge of a relationship built on “mutual respect.” Now the State Department accuses Vladimir Putin of lying and claims the Obama Administration misread Russian intentions. That did not all happen in a vacuum."
Seriously, shouldn't the half-assed media be asking her to comment. Remember how long it took her to comment on the Syria brouhaha and then some wishy-washy statement was ssued that she supports Obama asking Congress what to do.
Seeing how she isn't the SOS anymore, why should she comment? And how come your Queen, sarah palin, hasn't opened her big mouth about this topic yet?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
