Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-22-2014, 04:25 PM
 
Location: west mich
5,739 posts, read 6,934,715 times
Reputation: 2130

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by aneftp View Post
I agree. The left tries to magnify the facts that 45-50 million can't afford health care. Yet they neglect govt data that shows close to 15 million of uninsured have household incomes over $75k. Those people chose not to carry insurance in most cases. And even if they couldn't afford it the Aca still wouldn't help most of them since they are close to the 400% poverty line cut off.

Plus another 15 million without insurance are generally healthy and under age 35. The Aca costs is actually more expensive for many of them and even when factoring in subsidies the costs would be roughly the same pre Aca.

So we are really talking about 15 million who really can't afford health care. That's about 5% of the country. About the same percentage as those in Germany and switerland.
That is a lie pushed by Fox and the rest of the fascist media. Seems like you got that entire script from Faux News and posted it here. People without insurance are those denied coverage or ousted by their providers via the old trick of raising premiums until they are unaffordable. Of course some have opted out, but neither you nor Fox has knowledge of the age-to-personal income breakdown of this group.

Since I never get an answer I will ask you - how is the corporate republican ER system better than the ACA, single-payer, or the systems of civilized countries like Canada and Germany? You can be the first to answer.

Last edited by detwahDJ; 03-22-2014 at 04:34 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-22-2014, 04:33 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by cxr89 View Post
Lifetime Risk of Developing or Dying From Cancer

About 40 % of people who are alive will contract cancer in their lifetime. Do tell me, where does an uninsured patient go when they contract cancer...the E.R.?

And tell me, what happens when cancer is allowed to spread because an uninsured patient cant receive treatment or surgery for their cancer.

Should an individual be allowed to suffer or die because they were denied health insurance on the individual market because of acne they had as a teen?
What part of this will help the 30,000,000 expected to go without insurance?

You can sit here and whine and cry that people need insurance, but without the ability to answer the underlying problem which is tens of millions will STILL not have insurance, then the problem wasnt fixed.. Not even remotely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 04:36 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by detwahDJ View Post
That is a lie pushed by Fox and the rest of the fascist media. Seems like you got that entire script from Faux News and posted it here. People without insurance are those denied coverage or ousted by their providers via the old trick of raising premiums until they are unaffordable. Of course some have opted out, but neither you nor Fox has knowledge of the age-to-personal income breakdown of this group.

Since I never get an answer I will ask you - how is the corporate republican ER system better than the ACA, single-payer, or the systems of civilized countries like Canada and Germany? Please answer.
Then why have so many chosen to pay the fine rather than obtain insurance? According to you, people were denied coverage, well now they cant be.. But yet they STILL wont get insurance.

Of course those who were outed, or denied coverage would be the very very sick, tens of millions of them, so you would think there wouldnt be tens of millions going without..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 04:42 PM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,817,498 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Then why have so many chosen to pay the fine rather than obtain insurance?
Stupidity?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 04:59 PM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,507,037 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by aneftp View Post
I agree. The left tries to magnify the facts that 45-50 million can't afford health care. Yet they neglect govt data that shows close to 15 million of uninsured have household incomes over $75k. Those people chose not to carry insurance in most cases. And even if they couldn't afford it the Aca still wouldn't help most of them since they are close to the 400% poverty line cut off.

Plus another 15 million without insurance are generally healthy and under age 35. The Aca costs is actually more expensive for many of them and even when factoring in subsidies the costs would be roughly the same pre Aca.

So we are really talking about 15 million who really can't afford health care. That's about 5% of the country. About the same percentage as those in Germany and switerland.
Two other groups included in that inflated 45 million figure are non-citizens, and citizens who qualify for Medicaid, CHIP, and other healthcare programs.

IIRC, even Obama eventually lowered the # he used to around 30 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 05:01 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weichert View Post
Stupidity?
Wouldnt that be true pre ACA? As the Supreme Court stated, they arent there to legislate against the stupidity of the policies in which politicians enact, voted in by the citizens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 05:12 PM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,817,498 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Wouldnt that be true pre ACA? As the Supreme Court stated, they arent there to legislate against the stupidity of the policies in which politicians enact, voted in by the citizens.
There were fines (of this category) pre ACA?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 05:23 PM
 
9,858 posts, read 7,732,644 times
Reputation: 24542
So, what is Plan B? How do you force the uninsured to buy the insurance? Bribing with subsidies didn't work. Threats of fines don't work.

So here we are. 6 months of enrollment time over and the majority don't want it.

Maybe that's why we conservatives opposed it, knowing that you can't force a free people to purchase a product.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 05:32 PM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,817,498 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaraG View Post
So, what is Plan B? How do you force the uninsured to buy the insurance? Bribing with subsidies didn't work. Threats of fines don't work.

So here we are. 6 months of enrollment time over and the majority don't want it.

Maybe that's why we conservatives opposed it, knowing that you can't force a free people to purchase a product.
Drop EMTLA? That might essentially happen to the states that didn't accept expanded Medicaid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 05:34 PM
 
Location: west mich
5,739 posts, read 6,934,715 times
Reputation: 2130
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaraG View Post
So, what is Plan B? How do you force the uninsured to buy the insurance? Bribing with subsidies didn't work. Threats of fines don't work.

So here we are. 6 months of enrollment time over and the majority don't want it.

Maybe that's why we conservatives opposed it, knowing that you can't force a free people to purchase a product.
Then I'll ask you, why is the "conservative" emergency room system better than the ACA or single-payer? Why would you oppose the public option system?
No "conservative" has answered this yet. Only the right wing media says the public at large don't want universal healthcare, and you are just parroting Fox.

I take it you have a corporate plan. What makes you think they won't drop you if you or a family member gets seriously ill? Don't say "government protection" please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top