Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is that just your rightwing opinion or is there some credible source that i can read pertaining to leftwing Walmart haters to get an idea of just how prevalent this phenomena is..
The post you replied to is one credible source. There are many others. Do your own homework.
I Cant be bothered to do major research on the issue, just thought you might have a handy link, i'll just take your word for the fact that evidently all liberals hate all Walmarts. Any other stores i should be aware of that as a liberal i should hate?, Target?Costco,Best Buys?
If you can't be bothered to do your own homework, then you are likely to remain uninformed. This is what is meant by the phrase, "low information voter."
Gates and Buffett have not set up a political network to steer national and local
elections, they are up front with their opinions rather than using a front company to do their bidding.
Let the Koch Brothers step up to the mic and tell us there opinion rather than hiding behind their money.
Quote:
The political network spearheaded by conservative billionaires Charles and
David Koch has expanded into a far-reaching operation of unrivaled complexity,
built around a maze of groups that cloaks its donors, according to an analysis
of new tax returns and other documents.
The resources and the breadth of the organization make it singular in American politics: an operation conducted outside the campaign finance system, employing an array of groups aimed at stopping what its financiers view as government overreach. Members of the coalition target different constituencies but together have mounted attacks on the new health-care law, federal spending and environmental regulations.
Yet you liberals think it is ok for a guy like Soros to "buy elections". Now why is that? You are full of it basically. All for me and none for thee is your attitude. See the IRS last election as an example if you are confused.
Bzzzt...wrong you are again!
If I had my way, we would get rid of PACs completely, and get rid of the campaign donation system completely. We should run elections how other countries do. All election campaigns publicly funded, and limited to about six weeks prior to election day.
Of course, you neo-cons would oppose that because it would be "socialism." Yet it seems to work fine in many other countries.
If I had my way, we would get rid of PACs completely, and get rid of the campaign donation system completely. We should run elections how other countries do. All election campaigns publicly funded, and limited to about six weeks prior to election day.
Of course, you neo-cons would oppose that because it would be "socialism." Yet it seems to work fine in many other countries.
I like this and the only thing left out was term limits.
That's right ... the Heinz family! And I recall that she also gives to the Tides Foundation. That money stays in circulation among liberals, doesn't it?
That's right ... the Heinz family! And I recall that she also gives to the Tides Foundation. That money stays in circulation among liberals, doesn't it?
Bet most citizens have no idea who Soro's is, let alone what he's up to.
I like this and the only thing left out was term limits.
Yep, term limits for Congress would be ideal as well, though probably impossible to achieve. I would also raise House terms from two years to at least four years to break up the campaign cycle further.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.