Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"This amendment states that people have the right to certain weapons, providing that they register them and have not been in prison. The founding fathers included the amendment to prevent the United States from acting like the British who had tried to take weapons away from the colonists".
There is no mention of what weapons, registration or felons in the second amendment.
Quote:
He reported the workbook to the head of the history department at the school, who explained that the description was written by teachers at the school some years ago. It predated Common Core, and would be re-evaluated given the concerns about its accuracy.
No surprise there. When people ask about examples of liberal policies being pushed in schools, there you go.
Yeah, it was probably pre-written in 2001........this is what is ahead from the left lies and more lies. Wonder why they have to re-evaluate something that shouldn't be there in the first place.
Well, the British certainly would have thought that, and if they had won it would still be taught like that. If you consider terrorism as targeting noncombatants for a political goal, well then there you go.
Well, the British certainly would have thought that, and if they had won it would still be taught like that. If you consider terrorism as targeting noncombatants for a political goal, well then there you go.
Boxes of tea don't fight back so yes, they are non-combatants
You consider that a "violent act intended to create fear among the people" ?
Boxes of tea don't fight back so yes, they are non-combatants
You consider that a "violent act intended to create fear among the people" ?
If the merchants felt threatened. The hope was they would protest to the king. I'm just saying lots of historical figures could be considered terrorists depending on perspective. Menachem Begin even became Prime Minister.
If the merchants felt threatened. The hope was they would protest to the king. I'm just saying lots of historical figures could be considered terrorists depending on perspective. Menachem Begin even became Prime Minister.
And perspective today is any violent act seems to be deemed "terrorist actions".
The original meaning of terrorism no longer applies.
No surprise there. When people ask about examples of liberal policies being pushed in schools, there you go.
It's simply a bald faced lie! Period. As we all know, the Second Amendment doesn't say anything about registration, nor did it say, "certain weapons."
This is how the Left indoctrinates instead of educating. I wonder why the workbook didn't quote the Second Amendment, so the students could read it for themselves?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
