Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm trying to figure out the point of your post. Apparently it's a complaint about the media coverage of this story but I don't understand why this is a problem. I don't understand why you call it propaganda.
I'm trying to figure out the point of your post. Apparently it's a complaint about the media coverage of this story but I don't understand why this is a problem. I don't understand why you call it propaganda.
If you read about the findings from BICEP2, they make these claims from the detection of E and B mode polarization and there are arguments whether these components are even cosmological.
The media sensationalism COMBINED with skepticism from field professionals who say "nothing is solved yet".
Quote:
“This is not something that’s just a home run, but a grand slam. It’s the smoking gun for inflation. It hints at unification of the fundamental forces at energies 10 trillions of times higher than those accessible at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN,” Kamionkowski said.
^^^^^media runs with that
Turok says "No" ... MSM??? *crickets*
Seems to me like the issue is one of comprehension....on your end. Good luck in your endeavors figuring it out.
When NY Times printed that article Kamionkowski stated "The results of BICEP2 were not fully understood"....BY HIM. This is the same guy who said it's a "smoking gun"!!
1 - Why would the field/media fell compelled to release some grandstanding video and make emphatic statements that this has been "proven" when the science is clearly unsettled...
2 - Why was such major news propagated in such a weird and anti-climactic way. It seemed like it was scripted.
If you read about the findings from BICEP2, they make these claims from the detection of E and B mode polarization and there are arguments whether these components are even cosmological.
I don't think the science is unsettled. . from what I understand.
I mean just because you can ignore huge amounts of observation . . .doesn't mean everyone else does
1 - Why would the field/media fell compelled to release some grandstanding video and make emphatic statements that this has been "proven" when the science is clearly unsettled...
2 - Why was such major news propagated in such a weird and anti-climactic way. It seemed like it was scripted.
If you read about the findings from BICEP2, they make these claims from the detection of E and B mode polarization and there are arguments whether these components are even cosmological.
The big bang theory cannot be proven. Not now, not ever.
Just because you can accept a bunch of information that you DON'T understand doesn't mean everyone else does.
what leads you to this conclusion?
Ad Hominimum attacks on other people doesn't prove you right or wrong.
You don't know my education level, the people in my network, or my ability to understand relevant scientific data.
Based on my review, and the support, I see no widespread disagreement in the scientific community regarding these facts.
People who blast theories, don't understand. . its like seeing a huge number of signs , roads, weather patterns, etc all pointing in the same direction. All giving you the same data. Independently and uniquely verifiable and all tests only seek to confirm the hypothesis
I'm up . . .for your theory. If all signs point to this event . . what is your theory that competes? One that fills in all the same gaps as this theory does, but just happens to be different
i'm waiting
How about a Giant being in another dimension ejaculation that is . . .
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.