Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-25-2014, 07:41 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,735,123 times
Reputation: 9325

Advertisements

Particularly rail. Rail made much more economic sense when a huge percent of the population worked 8 to 5 and commuted to a central location. Today, more and more people work from home, travel, work odd hours or work from a remote location. Rail takes you from a location of it's choosing to a location of it's choosing. You can choose to move close to a rail station, but most people don't. The "if you build it, they will come" philosophy has been a total failure. Most of us just shake our heads in wonder as we watch mostly empty light rail cars go by.

Meanwhile, tax payers watching the half empty rail cars are sitting in traffic jams because they have no choice. Politicians believe if they make driving more painful (by slowing funding for roads) then people will shift from cars to rail. The problem is that most people have no choice. They don't commute to a central location every day.

So despite hundreds of billions of dollars invested and hundreds of billions of dollars from tax payers, ridership per capita continues to decline and has done so for decades. But it's politically correct to continue to invest in rail even though a huge majority of tax payers will never board a train.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-25-2014, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,171,483 times
Reputation: 7875
Interesting observation, the light rail car and two subway trains I was on this morning were all full. Is your post based on any tangible information or just an observation?

Also this thread should be in urban planning or a transportation forum and should be moved to the correct forum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2014, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Limbo
6,512 posts, read 7,547,379 times
Reputation: 6319
Are you speaking about light-rail, heavy-rail, or both? And what do you propose as an alternative?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2014, 07:55 AM
 
45,221 posts, read 26,431,296 times
Reputation: 24972
The fact that mass transit must be heavily subsidized to maintain operations says it all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2014, 07:57 AM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,460,012 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
The fact that mass transit must be heavily subsidized to maintain operations says it all.
And highways aren't subsidized?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2014, 07:58 AM
 
45,221 posts, read 26,431,296 times
Reputation: 24972
Quote:
Originally Posted by pch1013 View Post
And highways aren't subsidized?
Gas taxes and tolls paid by actual users.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2014, 08:01 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,171,483 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Gas taxes and tolls paid by actual users.
And what about the rest? Gas taxes and tolls don't cover the full cost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2014, 08:02 AM
 
45,221 posts, read 26,431,296 times
Reputation: 24972
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
And what about the rest? Gas taxes and tolls don't cover the full cost.
Lay out the rest.
Maybe they would cover full cost if not siphoned off for other purposes such as rail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2014, 08:02 AM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,460,012 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Gas taxes and tolls paid by actual users.
The vast majority of road miles in the US are toll-free.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2014, 08:03 AM
 
45,221 posts, read 26,431,296 times
Reputation: 24972
Quote:
Originally Posted by pch1013 View Post
The vast majority of road miles in the US are toll-free.
And fuel taxes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top