Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:19 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
You are WRONG - there was never a Supreme Court ruling about Don't Ask, Don't Tell. This was a Legislative action on December 18, 2010, before the new 2010 elections sent the Democrats to the minority. It was one of those end of the year things that Congress does so they can go home for Christmas.

Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010

The issue in this case is NOT about whether Don't Ask, Don't tell should have been repealed - it's about the President of the United States forcing the Military Leadership - all the Joint Staffs to violate their OATH to follow the Laws of the USA and give in to the whim of the President - OR resign from office.

This is the same President that stated in an interview in December of 2008 that he would never make repeal of DOMA a "litmus test" to his Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Back to “don’t ask, don’t tell” real quick -- you’ve said before you don’t think that’s a heavy lift. Of course, it would be if you had Joint Chiefs who were against repeal. Is that something you’ll look at? "I would never make this a litmus test for the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Obviously, there are so many issues that a member of the Joint Chiefs has to deal with, and my paramount obligation is to get the best possible people to keep America safe."

Add this one to the Obama LIE column.

I disagreed with DOMA the day it was passed and never wavered on that - it is absolutely WRONG to discriminate against Gay Americans because of what they may or may not do in the privacy of their bedrooms. So this is the real question - what is more wrong? Discrimination that is passed by Congress and signed by a President (in this case, Bill Clinton), OR is it more wrong to have a sitting President that has no respect for the "Law of the Land" and uses his power to threaten American citizens (in this case the Military Joint Chiefs of Staff)?

Bad Law can be overturned by Congress or the Supreme Court - what do we do with a Bad President who believes he is above the Law and uses his power to threaten citizens? We have a serious problem and nobody really wants to face that. This same administration has continues to threaten citizens - the IRS Target program is a great example of that. It's no wonder that people are afraid of him - his Oath of Office is meaningless to him and he has no compunction about using his power against the US Citizens on his whim.
I didnt say Supreme Court, and I'm not wrong.

Appeals court suspends enforcement of 'don't ask, don't tell' policy - CNN.com

It was Republicans that went to court to remove DADT, and won..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:31 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 17 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,547 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post

The issue in this case is NOT about whether Don't Ask, Don't tell should have been repealed - it's about the President of the United States forcing the Military Leadership - all the Joint Staffs to violate their OATH to follow the Laws of the USA and give in to the whim of the President - OR resign from office.
You do realize that you can agree that a policy is wrong, and not violate it right ?

It is not a violation of your oath to simply say you disagree with a policy, it isnt a violation until you well,violate the policy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:33 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 17 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,547 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6029
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I didnt say Supreme Court, and I'm not wrong.

Appeals court suspends enforcement of 'don't ask, don't tell' policy - CNN.com

It was Republicans that went to court to remove DADT, and won..
Yes, the LCR part is true, but you made the claim that President Obama defended the law, and that isnt true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:40 PM
 
17,441 posts, read 9,261,206 times
Reputation: 11906
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I didnt say Supreme Court, and I'm not wrong.

Appeals court suspends enforcement of 'don't ask, don't tell' policy - CNN.com

It was Republicans that went to court to remove DADT, and won..
I knew that .... but Obama and the Democrats made absolutely sure that the DADT ruling in California was dead in the water. You are correct about Obama not caring anything about Gay Americans, Obama is all about Obama - everyone else is Cannon Fodder to his ambitions and Ego. He pushed DADT to poke a stick in the eye of the GOP, if he cared at all about Gay Rights he would have done something before the California Court stepped in (which he fought tooth and nail) and before Biden forced him into action on DOMA. A lower court did not over-turn DADT, the US Congress did in December of 2010, I think they went along with it to make sure it didn't get to the Supreme Court. The last thing the GOP was interested in was a US Supreme Court decision about Gay Rights.

The one thing that Obama and the Democrats could never allow was for any GOP group to bring DADT or DOMA to the US Supreme Court ..... and that's exactly where that case was headed.

The fact remains - he threatened the Military Joint Chiefs with firing if they did not go against settled US Law and in any book ..... that's WRONG. Obama LIED about his "litmus test" to the Military Leadership, but what's new about that? He is the dude that won the Lie of the Year Award from the Washington Post in 2013. There are so many LIES that it's hard for anyone to even keep track of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:44 PM
 
46,943 posts, read 25,964,420 times
Reputation: 29434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
The fact remains - he threatened the Military Joint Chiefs with firing if they did not go against settled US Law and in any book ..... that's WRONG.
Ehm - read the OP again. He told them, in effect, that the policy was going to change and that he expected them to back him in changing it. That is perfectly correct behavior.

And as pghquest's link (thanks!) points out, the administration was in full swing dismantling DADT in cooperation with the military. The Log Cabin Republicans then decided to file a lawsuit to effectuate an immediate change, and the easily-led concluded that "Obama fought for DADT", which once again goes to prove that a half truth is better propaganda than a full lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:45 PM
 
17,441 posts, read 9,261,206 times
Reputation: 11906
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
You do realize that you can agree that a policy is wrong, and not violate it right ?

It is not a violation of your oath to simply say you disagree with a policy, it isnt a violation until you well,violate the policy.
A LAW passed by Congress and signed into LAW by a President is not "policy" .... it's the Law of the Land. The President of the United States and all of the Military say an Oath to respect and defend the Law of the Land. Until they rewrite the Constitution so that it reads "I will defend only those Laws I agree with", he has a obligation to uphold that Oath ..... or perhaps he could just feed all copies into a shredder and the citizens and media will Shrug. Once Again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:45 PM
 
3,433 posts, read 5,743,844 times
Reputation: 5471
Glad my honorable military service was over long ago.

Glad my son's is also ( 20 years active) and he is drawing pension.

Seeing what the military has become ( a "pc" experiment ) I would NOT recommend the military for any of my grandkids.

Ten years ago, I would have enthusiastically.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:52 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Yes, the LCR part is true, but you made the claim that President Obama defended the law, and that isnt true.
He not only defended the law, but when the court ordered its removal, Obama went back and asked them to reconsider their order.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:56 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,707,495 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post

Actually Obama went to court to oppose the removal of DADT, he only repealed it after a court ordered him to.
I was not aware of this. Can you provide a link to a credible source, please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:59 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,707,495 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by All American NYC View Post
So Obama threatens our men of honor.

Sounds like hearsay to me.

Although I do hope it went down just as portrayed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top