Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's simply not true, and we know it's not true because if no one wanted voter fraud to occur it wouldn't yet we have hard proof that it does happen.
Could there possibly be a more breathtakingly naive post in all of Western Christendom?
I don't think it really exists at all other then maybe a few cases which are zealously prosecuted. Of the only 765/35750 had the same last four SSN numbers. Chances are like in the past, it will turn out that substantially all of those 765 are actual flukes where someone had the same name DOB and last 4 SSN digits or are clerical errors where the clerks input something wrong.
That would be great and I am agog to see the results. However the rightwing OP, who now clearly has egg on his face with the 35,750 figure, chose not to and I am against letting propaganda stand.
Is this where you try using nonexistent conspiracy claims to discount what I'm saying because you can't win a basic argument? Are you going to post photos of some cat wearing a tin foil hat and claim victory?
I've never posted tin foil photos. Nor have I ever "claimed victory".
But you are asserting a conspiracy, coordinated or not, and the fact that you are committed to believing that your fellow Americans, thousands in North Carolina say you, means that any facts or logic that contradicts what you are committed to believing will be discounted.
I'm well able to win a basic argument.
I've already pointed out that, in fact, while these allegations keep on being made by conservatives, that there is no proof. Your rebuttal, that Democrats are acting in a coordinated way to hide the proof, is not supported by facts, but is in fact, an example of digging further into the conspiracy hole.
We just recently learned that there are over 900 individuals who had died before the election (and had voted) and at least 600 of those individuals had died way outside the window that an absentee ballot could have been sent, so we know for a fact that there are deceased people whose identities are being used in elections in South Carolina.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Egbert
So do you think we should ban all forms of early, mail and absentee balloting because someone might die between casting their vote and election day. That would be pretty short sighted.
No, it should be monitored more....But then again, the link you provide says completly different...lol...
How many fraudulent votes do you consider permissible? Is it 8 for every 1000? Would 9 be too many?
or 100?
What nonsense. Voter fraud is fraud. Period.
As long as the number is smaller than the number of eligible voters who will be denied the franchise by whatever the "fix" might be, they are permissible.
Nonsense, you know the only goal for wanting secure elections is to stop black folks from voting. Any other reason given is always hiding the fact that nobody wants black people voting.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
