Lying About Climate Change To Advance The Environmental Agenda Is A Good Idea, Say Two Economists (dollars, voting)

[aedubber]

When you see the words radical being used then you know its just more liberal nonsense lol .

[sanspeur]

Originally Posted by gretsky99

Wow...moonbats have been around for over 90 years.

A 1922 newspaper article reported that "radical change in climatic conditions" was melting Arctic ice and disrupting wildlife.

snopes.com: Global Warming -- 1922

Try harder and read it all mr moonbat....It will save you further embarrassment....

From your link.... As interesting as this nearly century-old article might be from a modern perspective, however, it isn't substantive evidence either for or against the concept of anthropogenic global warming. As documented elsewhere, the warming phenomena observed in 1922 proved to be indicative only of a local event in Spitzbergen, not a trend applicable to the Arctic as a whole.

[gretsky99]

The Global Warming Gestapo's will not tolerate dissent.

Government uses peer review process to squash dissent | The Daily Caller

[Ceist]

Let's play...

Global warming denial Bingo

[Hyperthetic]

Originally Posted by gretsky99

The Global Warming Gestapo's will not tolerate dissent.

Government uses peer review process to squash dissent | The Daily Caller

Uh, yup.

Peer review does other things, too!

[passwithoutatrace]

Isn't it ironic that an article discussing the scientific peer review process doesn't cite a single source?

[Ceist]

Originally Posted by passwithoutatrace

Isn't it ironic that an article discussing the scientific peer review process doesn't cite a single source?

There is only one source for that article. It's from Bending and Over in their seminal work:

Bending, I., & Over, I. (1950). Sticking our heads between our legs. (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1-1). Looking Up: Sphinctre.

[dv1033]

Originally Posted by passwithoutatrace

Isn't it ironic that an article discussing the scientific peer review process doesn't cite a single source?

And the Nobel laureates it mentions apparently don't have a name.....

[plwhit]

Dontcha just love this "scientists say" crap?

I join with others, a rant in some news blog with no references, no footnotes nothing

[Ceist]

I bet those Young Earth Creationists get really pissed when those (clearly biased) academic Journals won't accept their articles about a 6000 year old earth and Intelligent Falling.