Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You are shooting at the wrong messenger - if you look closely, you will see the article was translated from a piece in the Swiss newspaper of record, Neue Zürcher Zeitun.
No, that messenger deserve to be drawn and quartered, never mind shot...
That still does not negate the fact that a well respected scientist, in a well respected newspaper, is pointing out the fact the CAGW emperor (climate models) has no clothes.
Weird how the published opinion of the vast majority of climatologists means nothing, but some nobody quoted by a think-tank holds the coin of the realm. That's not science.
Weird how the published opinion of the vast majority of climatologists means nothing, but some nobody quoted by a think-tank holds the coin of the realm. That's not science.
If you read the other climate change thread you'd know consensus is meaningless.
Meaningless to denialists, yes. To a denialist, anything that parrots Republican garbage is science and science that doesn't parrot Republican garbage is a hoax.
I have never claimed to be unbiased regarding this subject anymore than you are, but that doesn't matter....It is the science that needs to be free of bias.
Yet YOUR scientists dismiss OUR scientists all the time. And folks like you go even further, denigrating our side's scientists, sometimes pretty viciously.
Science is an ongoing process of discovery of how the physical universe works. There are ongoing arguments about quantum theory, string theory, and global warming theory. It is YOUR side that has declared the AGW argument is over, and furthermore, your side has changed the definition of climate change, equating it with global warming, even though "change" means hotter AND colder, aka "different".
Weird how the published opinion of the vast majority of climatologists means nothing, but some nobody quoted by a think-tank holds the coin of the realm. That's not science.
Climatology is a pseudo science that produces conclusions that cannot be verified through the scientific method.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
