Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-11-2014, 04:03 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,717,658 times
Reputation: 20674

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
To be accurate, we don't really know what Romney paid in taxes. After much dithering, he released two years of tax returns (you are allowed to amend your returns for last 3 years). But, oddly, he refused to release anything further back, even though most presidential nominees release five or more years.
Then then Anne Romney let loose with " we have given you people all you need to know about our financial position".

And I say this as someone who would not have been crushed if Romney had won.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-11-2014, 04:04 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
702 posts, read 726,573 times
Reputation: 932
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
From what I have read, the records of cost related to family travel during the Bush years seems to have gone missing.

The number and cost of the Bush family trips was not the issue it has been with the Obama family, despite the Bush family, especially Laura, did substantially more travel than Michelle Obama.

GW Bush holds the record for most vacation days at 879 which included a 5 week vacation.
As of last summer, Obama had recorded 92 days.

No president is every fully on vacation.
Well, knowing Obama he'll catch up and take 800 more vacation days in the next two years.

/conservative
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2014, 04:06 PM
 
4,156 posts, read 4,172,158 times
Reputation: 2076
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Unfortunately we don't really tax net worth, just incomes earned. Though I think we should start taxing net worth.
Don't worry. Government will tax the net worth soon. Actually, it will be call a wealth tax. Of course, if you work for the people, like the politician, you are exempt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2014, 04:08 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,866 posts, read 24,099,797 times
Reputation: 15134
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
I think we should start taxing net worth.
You're for double taxation? Wow. We have our differences, but I never would have guessed that about you. My respect for you just dropped by about 2/3.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2014, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,866 posts, read 24,099,797 times
Reputation: 15134
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjake54 View Post
Much higher than Romney's 15% from the capital gains from his Swiss accounts.
The same 15% I pay on capital gains. The same 15% that you pay on capital gains. The same 15% that everybody pays on capital gains.

BTW, what difference does it make where the money is held, as long as taxes are being paid? Are you one of those poor, ignorant people that thinks you can avoid paying taxes because your money is in Switzerland? Those days are LONG gone, but you just keep believing whatever silly fantasies you want to believe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2014, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,167,905 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by cw30000 View Post
Don't worry. Government will tax the net worth soon. Actually, it will be call a wealth tax. Of course, if you work for the people, like the politician, you are exempt.
I doubt that will ever happen, that would require politicians willing to tax themselves more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2014, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,167,905 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
You're for double taxation? Wow. We have our differences, but I never would have guessed that about you.
Our current system makes it too easy for the wealthy to increase their net worth while claiming they took a loss in earned income in order to get a lower tax rate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2014, 04:26 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,334,167 times
Reputation: 11538
Just look at the link I posted......all of the federal and state information Obama gave is right there.....no opinions.

There is one thing that made me laugh.....I wonder what the "wife of the president of the USA" pays.

It was listed as "occupation".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2014, 04:27 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,334,167 times
Reputation: 11538
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Our current system makes it too easy for the wealthy to increase their net worth while claiming they took a loss in earned income in order to get a lower tax rate.
Sure...that is what Obama did....so did I.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2014, 04:30 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,167,905 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
Sure...that is what Obama did....so did I.
Well our system is set up for people who have the ability to increase their net worth while making it look like they earned less income than they did. It is a loophole that should be closed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top