Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Don't change the subject. You claimed second amendment rights to remove the government. That's assassination.
If I remember correctly, the citizens of the western Utah territory, what is now Nevada, agreed to let the Feds control the vast majority of land as a condition of statehood.
If they mean to commit tyranny and violate the Constitution they have lost any moral and legal right to govern.
Yeah that was over 150 years ago....Many things have changed, that is our land, and we can use it for far better then the feds can...
Don't change the subject. You claimed second amendment rights to remove the government. That's assassination.
If I remember correctly, the citizens of the western Utah territory, what is now Nevada, agreed to let the Feds control the vast majority of land as a condition of statehood.
I never said anything about that just said Waco is coming as the government doesn't abide by it. Do they? Of course not.
IMO it''s all about agenda 21. Take the land. Why do the feds control all that land anyway? What is there to control? Oh frogs and owls and turtles. Let the "PEOPLE" buy that land if they so see fit. Then we have no "grazing fees" or any other nonsense. Waste of money to hold land away from the people. Our government our land IMO. You don't think that go talk to King George.
How is all of the affecting the 2014 election landscape in NV? I ask because I have maybe 20 clients in NV and even my liberal clientele are angry at Reid over this.
How is all of the affecting the 2014 election landscape in NV? I ask because I have maybe 20 clients in NV and even my liberal clientele are angry at Reid over this.
Alot of people are hyper pissed at him..I am even labor unions are really mad at him.
The Constitution permits assassination? There are a few people in prison who would be very interested in your theory.
There would not be a 2nd amendment, if assassination was not an option.
Remember, we just fought a bloody war against a tyrant.
Individual freedom permits assassination.
There would not be a 2nd amendment, if assassination was not an option.
Remember, we just fought a bloody war against a tyrant.
Individual freedom permits assassination.
Sorry but this is not 1776 much as some would hope it to be, carrying guns to defend a deadbeat rancher that doesn't believe in the federal government is a far cry from Concord and Lexington. He looks great riding his horse with the American Flag for photo ops, but then you look at the facts and see how misguided these people are, maybe they don't want to face reality.
You have completely missed the point. The BLM Thugs were the first ones to show up with assault and sniper rifles.
The BLM Thugs were the first ones to use tasers and attack dogs.
The BLM Thugs were the first ones to physically attack the Bundy clan.
Your ex post facto photo is called a response to what the BLM Thugs started.
And your photo is exactly why The BLM Thugs ran away.
Small point ... something tells me that the person in the photo is NOT a Bundy family member. So I guess the Bundy guns were indeed holstered.
El Nox
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
