Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-06-2014, 10:12 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,870,989 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapaport View Post
How many times this has to be repeated? We are a democracy as we chose our governments in democratic election and our laws, including constitution, can always be changed through the same democratic process. "We're not a democracy, were a republic". Give me a break!
A republic chooses representatives to form their government.

We are a democratic republic because we hold democratic elections to choose our representatives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-06-2014, 02:40 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,781,638 times
Reputation: 4174
A pure democracy is one that holds a mass vote of all the people, to decide whether to mow the lawn of the Capitol building this week.

We ain't one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2014, 02:47 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,098,699 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapaport View Post
How many times this has to be repeated? We are a democracy as we chose our governments in democratic election and our laws, including constitution, can always be changed through the same democratic process. "We're not a democracy, were a republic". Give me a break!
We are a Constitutional Republic with Democratic institutions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2014, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,740,791 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckmann View Post
Sigh.

The word "militia" occurs 5 times in the Constitution. (there might be a 6th, but I'm too tired to find it at this point. Some help?)

Article 2 Section 8: (Congress)

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress

Article 2, Section 2: (The President)

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

2nd Amendment:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.


I think that 1) the first and second amendments have no direct relationship and 2) the Founding Fathers, even though recognizing the necessity of the right to bear arms applied specifically to the ability of the citizenry to serve when called to duty in defense of the nation by congress and the president, they did not conceive of a situation where government would deny citizens their weapons when the purpose of their having weapons was to serve in defense of this nation.

And no, you right wing ideologues, the Founders NEVER intended that the right to bear arms had anything to do with resisting or rebelling against the government.

Can anyone provide more or better information?
Yeah that is a damn lies...sooo yeah..


I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Co-author of the Second Amendment
during Virginia's Convention to Ratify the Constitution, 1788

"A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves …"
Richard Henry Lee
writing in Letters from the Federal Farmer to the Republic, Letter XVIII, May, 1788.

"The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full posession of them."
Zachariah Johnson
Elliot's Debates, vol. 3 "The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution."

"… the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms"
Philadelphia Federal Gazette
June 18, 1789, Pg. 2, Col. 2
Article on the Bill of Rights

"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; …"
Samuel Adams
quoted in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20, 1789, "Propositions submitted to the Convention of this State"

The Founding Fathers on Arms

"Firearms stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence … from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurences and tendencies prove that to ensure peace security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable … the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere restrains evil interference — they deserve a place of honor with all that's good."
George Washington
First President of the United States

"The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand arms, like laws, discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as property. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside … Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them."
Thomas Paine

"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."
Richard Henry Lee
American Statesman, 1788

"The great object is that every man be armed." and "Everyone who is able may have a gun."
Patrick Henry
American Patriot

"Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?"
Patrick Henry
American Patriot

"Those who hammer their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not."
Thomas Jefferson
Third President of the United States

"The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that … it is their right and duty to be at all times armed; … "
Thomas Jefferson
letter to Justice John Cartwright, June 5, 1824. ME 16:45.

"The best we can help for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed."
Alexander Hamilton
The Federalist Papers at 184-8

The Founding Fathers on Maintaining Freedom

"The greatest danger to American freedom is a government that ignores the Constitution."
Thomas Jefferson
Third President of the United States

"There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. "
Noah Webster
American Lexicographer

"The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion."
Edmund Burke
British Statesman, 1784

"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms."
Thomas Jefferson
to James Madison

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Ben Franklin
American Statesman


The Second Amendment states: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"On every question of construction (of the Constitution) let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed." (Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, June 12, 1823, The Complete Jefferson, p. 322)

"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)

"The right of the people to keep and bear arms has been recognized by the General Government; but the best security of that right after all is, the military spirit, that taste for martial exercises, which has always distinguished the free citizens of these States....Such men form the best barrier to the liberties of America" - (Gazette of the United States, October 14, 1789.)

"No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." (Thomas Jefferson, Proposal Virginia Constitution, 1 T. Jefferson Papers, 334,[C.J.Boyd, Ed., 1950])

"The right of the people to keep and bear...arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country..." (James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434 [June 8, 1789])

"A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves...and include all men capable of bearing arms." (Richard Henry Lee, Additional Letters from the Federal Farmer (1788) at 169)

"What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty.... Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins." (Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, spoken during floor debate over the Second Amendment [ I Annals of Congress at 750 {August 17, 1789}])

"...to disarm the people - that was the best and most effectual way to enslave them." (George Mason, 3 Elliot, Debates at 380)

"Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." (James Madison, The Federalist Papers #46 at 243-244)

"the ultimate authority ... resides in the people alone," (James Madison, author of the Bill of Rights, in Federalist Paper #46.)

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States" (Noah Webster in `An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution', 1787, a pamphlet aimed at swaying Pennsylvania toward ratification, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at 56(New York, 1888))

"...if raised, whether they could subdue a Nation of freemen, who know how to prize liberty, and who have arms in their hands?" (Delegate Sedgwick, during the Massachusetts Convention, rhetorically asking if an oppressive standing army could prevail, Johnathan Elliot, ed., Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, Vol.2 at 97 (2d ed., 1888))

"...but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights..." (Alexander Hamilton speaking of standing armies in Federalist 29.)

"Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation. . . Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." (James Madison, author of the Bill of Rights, in Federalist Paper No. 46.)

"As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms." (Tench Coxe in `Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution' under the Pseudonym `A Pennsylvanian' in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789 at 2 col. 1)

"Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American... The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state government, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people" (Tench Coxe, Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788)

"The prohibition is general. No clause in the Constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give to Congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under some general pretense by a state legislature. But if in any blind pursuit of inordinate power, either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both." [William Rawle, A View of the Constitution 125-6 (2nd ed. 1829)

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for few public officials." (George Mason, 3 Elliot, Debates at 425-426)

"The Constitution shall never be construed....to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms" (Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 86-87)

"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike especially when young, how to use them." (Richard Henry Lee, 1788, Initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights, Walter Bennett, ed., Letters from the Federal Farmer to the Republican, at 21,22,124 (Univ. of Alabama Press,1975)..)

"The great object is that every man be armed" and "everyone who is able may have a gun." (Patrick Henry, in the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the Constitution. Debates and other Proceedings of the Convention of Virginia,...taken in shorthand by David Robertson of Petersburg, at 271, 275 2d ed. Richmond, 1805. Also 3 Elliot, Debates at 386)

"The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them." (Zachariah Johnson, 3 Elliot, Debates at 646)

"Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?" (Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836)

"The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." (Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers at 184-8)

"That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms..." (Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at 86-87 (Peirce & Hale, eds., Boston, 1850))

"And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms....The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants" (Thomas Jefferson in a letter to William S. Smith in 1787. Taken from Jefferson, On Democracy 20, S. Padover ed., 1939)

"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined" (Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836)

"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." -- (Thomas Jefferson)

"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence ... From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that is good" (George Washington)

"A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise, and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks. (Thomas Jefferson, Encyclopedia of T. Jefferson, 318 [Foley, Ed., reissued 1967])

"The supposed quietude of a good mans allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms like laws discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside...Horrid mischief would ensue were one half the world deprived of the use of them..." (Thomas Paine, I Writings of Thomas Paine at 56 [1894])

"...the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms" (from article in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette June 18, 1789 at 2, col.2,)

"Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people." (Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697])

"No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion." (James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775])

"Men that are above all Fear, soon grow above all Shame." (John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon, Cato's Letters: Or, Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and Other Important Subjects [London, 1755])

"The difficulty here has been to persuade the citizens to keep arms, not to prevent them from being employed for violent purposes." (Dwight, Travels in New-England)

"What country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms." (Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, Dec. 20, 1787, in Papers of Jefferson, ed. Boyd et al.)

(The American Colonies were) "all democratic governments, where the power is in the hands of the people and where there is not the least difficulty or jealousy about putting arms into the hands of every man in the country. (European countries should not) be ignorant of the strength and the force of such a form of government and how strenuously and almost wonderfully people living under one have sometimes exerted themselves in defence of their rights and liberties and how fatally it has ended with many a man and many a state who have entered into quarrels, wars and contests with them." [George Mason, "Remarks on Annual Elections for the Fairfax Independent Company" in The Papers of George Mason, 1725-1792, ed Robert A. Rutland (Chapel Hill, 1970)]

"To trust arms in the hands of the people at large has, in Europe, been believed...to be an experiment fraught only with danger. Here by a long trial it has been proved to be perfectly harmless...If the government be equitable; if it be reasonable in its exactions; if proper attention be paid to the education of children in knowledge and religion, few men will be disposed to use arms, unless for their amusement, and for the defence of themselves and their country." (Timothy Dwight, Travels in New England and NewYork [London 1823]

"It is not certain that with this aid alone [possession of arms], they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to posses the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will, and direct the national force; and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned, in spite of the legions which surround it." (James Madison, "Federalist No. 46")

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them. And yet, though this truth would seem so clear, and the importance of a well regulated militia would seem so undeniable, it cannot be disguised, that among the American people there is a growing indifference to any system of militia discipline, and a strong disposition, from a sense of its burthens, to be rid of all regulations. How it is practicable to keep the people duly armed without some organization, it is difficult to see. There is certainly no small danger, that indifference may lead to disgust, and disgust to contempt; and thus gradually undermine all the protection intended by this clause of our national bill of rights." (Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States; With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States before the Adoption of the Constitution [Boston, 1833])

"The tank, the B-52, the fighter-bomber, the state-controlled police and military are the weapons of dictatorship. The rifle is the weapon of democracy. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military. The hired servants of our rulers. Only the government-and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws." (Edward Abbey, "The Right to Arms," Abbey's Road [New York, 1979])

"You are bound to meet misfortune if you are unarmed because, among other reasons, people despise you....There is simply no comparison between a man who is armed and one who is not. It is unreasonable to expect that an armed man should obey one who is unarmed, or that an unarmed man should remain safe and secure when his servants are armed. In the latter case, there will be suspicion on the one hand and contempt on the other, making cooperation impossible." (Niccolo Machiavelli in "The Prince")

"You must understand, therefore, that there are two ways of fighting: by law or by force. The first way is natural to men, and the second to beasts. But as the first way often proves inadequate one must needs have recourse to the second." (Niccolo Machiavelli in "The Prince")

"As much as I oppose the average person's having a gun, I recognize that some people have a legitimate need to own one. A wealthy corporate executive who fears his family might get kidnapped is one such person. A Hollywood celebrity who has to protect himself from kooks is another. If Sharon Tate had had access to a gun during the Manson killings, some innocent lives might have been saved." [Joseph D. McNamara (San Jose, CA Police Chief), in his book, Safe and Sane, (c) 1984, p. 71-72.]

"To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege." [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)]

For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution." [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822)]

" `The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the milita, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right." [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)]

"The provision in the Constitution granting the right to all persons to bear arms is a limitation upon the power of the Legislature to enact any law to the contrary. The exercise of a right guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be made subject to the will of the sheriff." [People vs. Zerillo, 219 Mich. 635, 189 N.W. 927, at 928 (1922)]

"The maintenance of the right to bear arms is a most essential one to every free people and should not be whittled down by technical constructions." [State vs. Kerner, 181 N.C. 574, 107 S.E. 222, at 224 (1921)]

"The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the "high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2014, 05:37 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,781,638 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckmann View Post
Sigh.

the Founders NEVER intended that the right to bear arms had anything to do with resisting or rebelling against the government.
Sigh.

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them [citizens] under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government." - T. Jefferson, "Delcaration of Independence"

Funniest part is, some present-day liberals might actually try to convince normal people that the Framers intended the citizens "to throw off such government" merely by asking nicely.

The degree to which these liberals will twist themselves into strange pretzel shapes to convince themselves their silly malarkey is true, defies all belief sometimes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2014, 05:57 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,740,791 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Sigh.

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them [citizens] under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government." - T. Jefferson, "Delcaration of Independence"

Funniest part is, some present-day liberals might actually try to convince normal people that the Framers intended the citizens "to throw off such government" merely by asking nicely.

The degree to which these liberals will twist themselves into strange pretzel shapes to convince themselves their silly malarkey is true, defies all belief sometimes.
Mental gymnastics at it finest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2014, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Ohio
13,933 posts, read 12,893,585 times
Reputation: 7399
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCityTheBridge View Post
Someone who anticipates being the victim of a crime--and has time to go to purchase a gun for defense--has time to contact the police and/or extricate themselves from the situation.
What an extremely short sighted and dare I say ignorant response to the questions I asked of you. I presented valid points of interest in the "waiting period" debate and you swept them under the rug instead of admitting they were valid points. I actually expected more of you.

#1.... what are the police going to do when contacted? They aren't going to sit outside your house round the clock and be your personal body gaurds. They're going to file a report and keep it on record, and that's about it. Not to mention there are numerous stories out there where police response time to a call was exceedingly long. Just recently there was a story where a woman called the police, saying that her ex was breaking in to her house with a gun. Thirteen minutes later, the 911 operator heard the man shoot and never heard the womans voice again. 45 MINUTES LATER.... the police finally showed up to clean up the mess. Are you going to deny these stories exist?

#2.... someone who is being threatened can't always "extricate themselves from the situation".... If only it were that simple. What if they have kids? They can't just pick up and put their lives on hold. What if they live somewhere where they don't have any freinds or relatives nearby that they could go stay with? What if they have a job they have to go to everyday?

#3.... I still want an answer as to whether or not I would have to wait every time I wanted to purchase a gun. The fact that I'd have to wait for my 11th purchase when I could just use one of my already purchased ten handguns to kill my girlfreind is just draconian and asinine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2014, 11:45 PM
 
3,569 posts, read 2,520,027 times
Reputation: 2290
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper 88 View Post
What an extremely short sighted and dare I say ignorant response to the questions I asked of you. I presented valid points of interest in the "waiting period" debate and you swept them under the rug instead of admitting they were valid points. I actually expected more of you.

#1.... what are the police going to do when contacted? They aren't going to sit outside your house round the clock and be your personal body gaurds. They're going to file a report and keep it on record, and that's about it. Not to mention there are numerous stories out there where police response time to a call was exceedingly long. Just recently there was a story where a woman called the police, saying that her ex was breaking in to her house with a gun. Thirteen minutes later, the 911 operator heard the man shoot and never heard the womans voice again. 45 MINUTES LATER.... the police finally showed up to clean up the mess. Are you going to deny these stories exist?

#2.... someone who is being threatened can't always "extricate themselves from the situation".... If only it were that simple. What if they have kids? They can't just pick up and put their lives on hold. What if they live somewhere where they don't have any freinds or relatives nearby that they could go stay with? What if they have a job they have to go to everyday?

#3.... I still want an answer as to whether or not I would have to wait every time I wanted to purchase a gun. The fact that I'd have to wait for my 11th purchase when I could just use one of my already purchased ten handguns to kill my girlfreind is just draconian and asinine.
I don't doubt that there are reasonable arguments on both sides, and I hope that a failure to address all of the points in a post dies not suggest a failure to consider all of those points. I'm sure that we both have focused, in this thread, on certain aspects of posts while giving less direct attention to other portions. As for the three points in this post:

#1 So the victim could go buy a gun in 13 minutes but not escape the shooter? Oh, no, not at all. That story is a red herring. If an assault has already precipitated the complaint to police, the perp can be charged with a crime and (depending on state law) jailed. The reality of domestic violence is that leaving is the only viable solution--whether a victim goes to family, friends, or a shelter. Killing the abuser is likely to result in a murder charge that may not be escaped.

#2 If someone can't extricate themselves from a situation, then a waiting period has no impact.

#3 I could understand exemption from a waiting period if you can demonstrate current ownership of a firearm (with some potential exceptions).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2014, 12:26 AM
 
Location: Ohio
13,933 posts, read 12,893,585 times
Reputation: 7399
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCityTheBridge View Post
#1 So the victim could go buy a gun in 13 minutes but not escape the shooter?
Oh, no, not at all. That story is a red herring.
If the woman in that story had went and bought a gun to protect herself before the attack, she MAY still be alive today. A waiting period would have only served to deprive her of a means of protection and would have prolonged her vulnerability.

The moral of that story, and hundreds like it, is that you can't rely on police to be there when you need them to be. When seconds count, police are minutes away.

I myself had an experience once, where someone was outside my house at midnight shooting a shotgun in to my lawn out the window of their pick up. I called the sheriff. I live out in the country in the middle of no where, and there is only one sheriff in my county patrolling at any given time. It took him 30 minutes to get here. If the guy in the pick up was actually trying to attack me, he could have killed me and been long gone by the time the sheriff got here. Trusting that the police will show up in time to save your bacon is frankly, no a viable option.
Quote:
If an assault has already precipitated the complaint to police, the perp
can be charged with a crime and (depending on state law) jailed.
I'm talking about situations where a woman breaks up with a man and he makes threats to kill or harm her. Calling police doesn't always do any good. Even if the police are willing to help, there is only so much they can do until he actually hurts her.
Quote:
Killing the abuser is likely to result in a murder charge that may not
be escaped.
Killing an attacker in self defense is perfectly legal, provided the criteria outlined in the law is met.
Quote:
#2 If someone can't extricate themselves from a situation, then a waiting
period has no impact.
How do you figure? Most people can't "extricate' themselves from their own lives. People break up and get out of abusive relationships, but they can't always pick up and move 100 miles away. If a woman gets out of an abusive relationship and the ex makes threats to kill or harm her, she shouldn't have to wait ten days before she can get a gun to defend herself if need be. All the waiting period is going to do in that situation is keep her vulnerable and defenseless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2014, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Someplace Wonderful
5,177 posts, read 4,790,366 times
Reputation: 2587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Sigh.

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them [citizens] under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government." - T. Jefferson, "Delcaration of Independence"

Funniest part is, some present-day liberals might actually try to convince normal people that the Framers intended the citizens "to throw off such government" merely by asking nicely.

The degree to which these liberals will twist themselves into strange pretzel shapes to convince themselves their silly malarkey is true, defies all belief sometimes.
Sigh.

The Declaration has no standing whatsoever with the Constitution, which was conceived and written a generation later.

I merely pointed out what the Constitution says regarding the place of the militia in the grand scheme of things. Why is it that you fanatics cant accept that?

PS I am ALL in favor of the citizenry owning and possessing guns. Except for howitzers and A-bombs, of course!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top