Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It probably sounds that way to you because it effectively repudiates perspectives that you prefer. If it was truly doublespeak, then a reasonable person wouldn't have thought it worthwhile enough to respond to.
Have you bothered to read the thread title or the OP? Evidently not.
Absolutely. It's evident you haven't a clue what the difference between deficit and debt is.
Absolutely. It's evident you haven't a clue what the difference between deficit and debt is.
What a childish response. I'm not pandering to your blatant attempt to rationalize your corrupted perspective through deflecting away from the topic if this thread (the deficit has gone down) to what you want everyone else to focus on instead, and I am the one who doesn't have a clue - about things I haven't even said Word One about in this thread? Are you really that afraid to admit that scurrilous nature of your deflection?
Well, certainly the GOP leadership didn't seem to care about the deficit - at least not until SOMEONE ELSE was in charge - then suddenly it's a big deal:
"Reagan proved that deficits don't matter" - Vice President Dick Cheney (2002)
Ken
What was the deficit and fiscal operating debt in 2002, and what was it under Obama with the dems in control, and then tell me if there was any significant difference? I'll wait.
What a childish response. I'm not pandering to your blatant attempt to rationalize your corrupted perspective through deflecting away from the topic if this thread (the deficit has gone down) to what you want everyone else to focus on instead, and I am the one who doesn't have a clue - about things I haven't even said Word One about in this thread? Are you really that afraid to admit that scurrilous nature of your deflection?
That is quite a deflection you got going. I find it very hard to believe they are taking in more money, then borrowing. http://www.treasurydirect.gov/news/p...pd08052004.htm Considering how many jobs have left to go overseas, and how much of the population is on food stamps. This is not a deflection, nor corrupted thought.
I suppose in the right-wing world where "up" is "down" and "black" is "white", my keeping to the topic of the thread could be considered a "deflection", but of course that just shows how corrupt the right-wing perspective has to be to keep it from collapsing in on its own perversion of logic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lookb4youcross
I find it very hard to believe they are taking in more money, then borrowing.
So you'll rely on your bias-afflicted gut feel instead of relying on actual numbers. Thanks for making the ridiculous nature of the foundation of your comment clear.
I suppose in the right-wing world where "up" is "down" and "black" is "white", my keeping to the topic of the thread could be considered a "deflection", but of course that just shows how corrupt the right-wing perspective has to be to keep it from collapsing in on its own perversion of logic.
So you'll rely on your bias-afflicted gut feel instead of relying on actual numbers. Thanks for making the ridiculous nature of the foundation of your comment clear.
Oh I see, I kinda figured you were a left-winger. Did you bother to check the link to find out the difference between deficit and debt? Oh wait, I forgot, lefties ignore facts when it proves them wrong. I am done with this topic here, you can continue to spin left wise.
I am done with this topic here, you can continue to spin left wise.
You were "done" with this topic before you posted your first comment, having consistently refused to address the topic of this thread, instead insisting on trying to deflect attention away from facts you didn't like in a ridiculously partisan effort to brow-beat reality out of the thread. It'll be interesting to see whether you'll live up to your word here that you won't try to deflect away from the topic of this thread further.
It probably sounds that way to you because it effectively repudiates perspectives that you prefer. If it was truly doublespeak, then a reasonable person wouldn't have thought it worthwhile enough to respond to.
Maybe thats why almost no one responded to it..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
