Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-02-2014, 04:00 PM
 
Location: CO
2,172 posts, read 1,453,117 times
Reputation: 972

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
Interesting find. And GHW Bush dad fared even worse than W did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-02-2014, 04:07 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,212,564 times
Reputation: 12102
Report: More Than 92 Million Americans Remain Out Of Labor Force.

Report: More Than 92 Million Americans Remain Out Of Labor Force « CBS DC

Of course those are not counted since they are no longer seeking jobs.

Thus more are not working now than in a loooong time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2014, 04:22 PM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,981,479 times
Reputation: 3396
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
Report: More Than 92 Million Americans Remain Out Of Labor Force.

Report: More Than 92 Million Americans Remain Out Of Labor Force « CBS DC

Of course those are not counted since they are no longer seeking jobs.

Thus more are not working now than in a loooong time.
Already responded to the above in this post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2014, 04:23 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post

When you remove the prolonged unemployment bennies, it looks like more people actually hit the bricks.

Is this 288,000, on top of the 344,000 lost just last week?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2014, 04:24 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,212,564 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
Already responded to the above in this post.
And notice how the numbers increased as the economy got worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2014, 04:28 PM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,981,479 times
Reputation: 3396
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
And notice how the numbers increased as the economy got worse.
And what direction were they heading during the Bush Years (2001 - 2009)?

Year Qtr1
2001 70904
2002 72722
2003 74511
2004 76107
2005 77532
2006 78163
2007 78826
2008 79985
2009 81253
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2014, 04:30 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
Because in the black-and-white world of the rabid right-wing, there is only perfection and damnation -

As opposed to deception and lies from the Progressives, in your black-and-white world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2014, 04:44 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,851,639 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraven View Post
It isn't all sweetness and light; carefully read this:
Hiring in U.S. Kicks Into Higher Gear as Unemployment Plunges to 6.3% - Bloomberg

especially this part:


"One cloud in today’s employment report is worker pay is stagnating. Average hourly earnings held at $24.31 in April, and were up 1.9 percent over the past 12 months, the smallest gain this year.
The drop in the unemployment rate from March’s 6.7 percent came as the agency’s survey of households showed the labor force shrank by more the 800,000 in April. The so-called participation rate, which indicates the share of working-age people in the labor force, decreased to 62.8 percent, matching the lowest level since 1978, from 63.2 percent a month earlier."


Statistics are wonderful things. They can be adjusted to prove anything.
So many college students nowadays which makes that number actually worse.
Higher percentage of college students now means less of the high unemployment the college age range suffers from.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2014, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,707,495 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post
The CNN report I read just now noted that it will still take a while to get down to the '4 to 5 percent' unemployment rate that we had prior to the recession.

Unemployment rate falls, but for wrong reasons - May. 2, 2014

However, I rather bet that 6 percent will become the new norm. As detailed in many financial articles over the past six years, many corporations took 'advantage' of the recession to get rid of superfluous jobs (including work that could now be done by computers, jobs shipped overseas, etc). Many government agencies (mine included) are now able to get the work done with fewer people. The backbone of middle class jobs, manufacturing, is still dwindling (I recall when steel mills employed several hundreds of thousands of people). Of course, on the plus side, we Baby Boomers are getting old, and there will be a steady and increasing demand for health care workers.

Anyway, I shall now step aside so we can have the usual explanations (as alluded to by Winter) as to why a falling unemployment rate actually means the number of people unemployed is skyrocketing.
Government, federal, state , county and municipal have shed more jobs than any other segment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2014, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,442,711 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
1) Retired people live off retirement income and savings and Social Security

2) Stay at Home Mothers/Fathers live off the income of the working spouse

3) Disabled people live off disability benefits

Baby Boomers (b: 1946 - 1964) are reaching the age of retirement, so it's expected that you would have an increase in the number of retired.
806,000 fell into one of those 3 categories in 30 days ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top