Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What we have needed is a special committee looking into Cheney/Bush - then I can hear the right-wing bellowing start.
More on a long list of treachery is Reagan arranging to have young innocent Americans, you know - pawns, held hostage in Iran until after his election. What a bunch of "super patriots" righties are.
Just part of the innate mentality...
Discuss those 13 embassy right here. Which ones asked for security?
Discuss where the president was .
Discuss that the president called them all a terrorist attack not blaming it on anything but terror
Discuss the panels that looked into those attacks
discuss whatever you want about them .What emails were asked for and given or nor given
What did the SS say about those attacks ?
What was said about those attacks on the sunday news shows discuss away
I think the point is they should be discussed in the mainstream corporate media and with the same fervor as Benghazi for all to see - not just on this forum.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,373,658 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside
That's the in intriguing question asked by Aaron Goldstein in the American Spectator -
"Why is it that Democrats don’t want to talk about Benghazi?
I'd fear Republicans who have such clear 20/20 hindsight and willingness to vilify people for problems they see in the past yet made NO mention of previously while being blind to the present and the future.
BTW, kinda funny we never heard any peeps from the right about a Marine barracks in Beirut and its own lack of security and subsequent carnage, eh? I don't recall anyone trying to place the blame on the POTUS and/or SoS then.
I'd fear Republicans who have such clear 20/20 hindsight and willingness to vilify people for problems they see in the past yet made NO mention of previously while being blind to the present and the future.
BTW, kinda funny we never heard any peeps from the right about a Marine barracks in Beirut and its own lack of security and subsequent carnage, eh? I don't recall anyone trying to place the blame on the POTUS and/or SoS then.
One wonders what they would be saying if POTUS on 9-11 was a democrat.
I haven't read this entire thread but I suspect they are afraid we'll find out that Obama was funneling weapons through Libya to Al Qaeda in Syria to de-stabilize the Syrian government. Once people from the embassy start talking the game is up. Obama couldn't care less but Hillary is worried because she went along.
Yeah, the Tea Party had one good election before people knew who they really were. After that they have been losing elections and struggling to keep seats. They should be almost completely removed by 2016.
LOL!
The silent majority barks after the wrong guy get placed in office.
Happened with Clinton, it happened with Bush and it happened with Obama.
It is just how Progressive politics works. Good cop, bad cop both against the People that wrote the rules.
Discuss those 13 embassy right here. Which ones asked for security?
Discuss where the president was .
Discuss that the president called them all a terrorist attack not blaming it on anything but terror
Discuss the panels that looked into those attacks
discuss whatever you want about them .What emails were asked for and given or nor given
What did the SS say about those attacks ?
What was said about those attacks on the sunday news shows
discuss away
Seriously? You're saying that they don't count because they weren't set up and carried out precisely and exactly in the manner that the attack happened in Benghazi? That's your argument?
Nothing was said about those attacks on the Sunday news shows as conservatives own all the media nowadays. You're absolutely correct, Rush Limbaugh never said a word about all those deaths. Come to think of it, Sean Hannity was quiet as well. Darrell Issa would never dream of putting Bush or anyone in his cabinet in the hot seat. These deaths don't count, they happened when a republican was in office?
What totally specious arguments you present. Those deaths count just as much. Period.
Seriously? You're saying that they don't count because they weren't set up and carried out precisely and exactly in the manner that the attack happened in Benghazi? That's your argument?
Nothing was said about those attacks on the Sunday news shows as conservatives own all the media nowadays. You're absolutely correct, Rush Limbaugh never said a word about all those deaths. Come to think of it, Sean Hannity was quiet as well. Darrell Issa would never dream of putting Bush or anyone in his cabinet in the hot seat. These deaths don't count, they happened when a republican was in office?
What totally specious arguments you present. Those deaths count just as much. Period.
Of course they do, and the right wingers know it. They have zero concern about all the previous deaths - including those in Iraq. Their concern is not about four deaths in Benghazi, but Hilary in 2016 - nothing else.
Absolutely nothing.
Shame watching the Pubs self-destruct when there are so many pressing issues.
Never mind doubling down on Benghazi. You guys should go all-in.
I think this is a very productive approach.
It'll make winning the midterms that much easier.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
