Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-18-2014, 07:48 PM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,671,534 times
Reputation: 9174

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ View Post

Satellite showed convoys heading to Syria with the cargos of Chemical Weapons.
Clear as day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-18-2014, 07:52 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 23 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,553 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6040
Quote:
Originally Posted by freightshaker View Post

Hmmm... Are you saying that then Senator Clinton was not privy to intel briefings on the situation in Iraq from the pentagon and CIA? Is that what you're saying? Think and look back before you answer this.

take a minute, reread your own post and maybe you will see your own flaw.

Did you think Hillary Clinton put together those briefings ??????

that is the only way your comment would make sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2014, 07:57 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,936,232 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
take a minute, reread your own post and maybe you will see your own flaw.

Did you think Hillary Clinton put together those briefings ??????

that is the only way your comment would make sense.
Hillary Clinton did not put together those briefings, and neither did Bush or Cheney. The pentagon and CIA put together those briefings. That said, was Senator Clinton unaware of the what was in them when she voted?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2014, 07:59 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 23 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,553 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6040
Quote:
Originally Posted by freightshaker View Post
Hillary Clinton did not put together those briefings, and neither did Bush or Cheney. The pentagon and CIA put together those briefings. That said, was Senator Clinton unaware of the what was in them when she voted?
Again your comments dont make sense.

She voted for what looked to be a credible report. Are you saying she should have known that they pieced together from b.s. ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2014, 08:00 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis
2,526 posts, read 3,051,742 times
Reputation: 4343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martha Anne View Post
I really don't find it to be "temporary stupidity". This decision was of catastrophic consequences. I would NEVER ever ever have supported the invasion nor would many millions of Americans. We knew Bush was making up a sham reason to invade. To miss this is really bad. For HER to miss it is inexcusable.
I don't think she missed anything. Hilary Clinton has shown herself to be a political opportunist on numerous occasions. Her Iraq vote was calculated to give her credibility in terms of military/national defense issues. Something she undoubtedly felt would be of use when she sought the Democratic Party nomination. In fairness to Clinton, there were twenty-eight other Democratic senators (and another eighty-two representatives) who voted for the invasion. What the whole matter shows is just how useless Democrats are as an alternative to Republicans. It's sort of like choosing between gonorrhea and chlamidya.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2014, 08:18 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,360,856 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
I used the word fabrication because that is indeed what they did.

They pieced together information to create a false narrative and they did it on purpose to get a desired result in an allotted amount of time(U.S./U.K. war deadline).


I call that a lie, as do most people. You are trying to put forth an argument that since the authors didnt use the word lie, then that means it isn't one and that just isn't true.
That is a misuse of the word 'lie.' If the weatherman tells you that it's going to rain tomorrow based on his Doppler radar, but it doesn't, is that a lie? No. If your auto mechanic advises you to use a particular oil and your car still breaks down, is it a lie? Again, no. If you want to accuse them of incompetence fine, but a lie, no.

Again dictionary.com sums it up

Quote:
Originally Posted by dictionary.com
a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive
.

You have to prove intent. What is your proof?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2014, 08:49 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 23 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,553 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6040
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
That is a misuse of the word 'lie.' If the weatherman tells you that it's going to rain tomorrow based on his Doppler radar, but it doesn't, is that a lie? No. If your auto mechanic advises you to use a particular oil and your car still breaks down, is it a lie? Again, no. If you want to accuse them of incompetence fine, but a lie, no.

Again dictionary.com sums it up

.

You have to prove intent. What is your proof?
THe very article you posted is proof. The governments both wanted war. Either spy organizations could find proof to back up their claims so to make their leaders happy they chose to put together B.S. that was never meant to be put together.

again, YOU introduced this article into the debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2014, 09:19 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,360,856 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
THe very article you posted is proof. The governments both wanted war. Either spy organizations could find proof to back up their claims so to make their leaders happy they chose to put together B.S. that was never meant to be put together.

again, YOU introduced this article into the debate.
Yeah, but the article does not really support your template. You claim that Bush or the intel people lied. The article by the Yale law prof does not say that.

Granted the intel was terrible, and should have been better. Spider Marks talked about the intel failures of Iraq.
Army General Tells a Little-Known Tale of Pre-War Intelligence on Iraq WMD | OpenSpace

It was a total cluster***, sure. But a lie, no.

Again, if you wish to accuse someone of a lie, have your ducks in a row.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2014, 11:28 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 23 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,553 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6040
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
Yeah, but the article does not really support your template. You claim that Bush or the intel people lied. The article by the Yale law prof does not say that.

Granted the intel was terrible, and should have been better. Spider Marks talked about the intel failures of Iraq.
Army General Tells a Little-Known Tale of Pre-War Intelligence on Iraq WMD | OpenSpace

It was a total cluster***, sure. But a lie, no.

Again, if you wish to accuse someone of a lie, have your ducks in a row.
You can keep posting those "if you wish to accuse" lines, but doing so doesnt make you right.

If you purposefully craft a story that you know to be untrue, that is a lie
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2014, 04:24 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13711
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
I used the word fabrication because that is indeed what they did.

They pieced together information to create a false narrative and they did it on purpose to get a desired result in an allotted amount of time (U.S./U.K. war deadline).

I call that a lie, as do most people. You are trying to put forth an argument that since the authors didnt use the word lie, then that means it isn't one and that just isn't true.
Source of the lies:


President Clinton orders attack on Iraq - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top