Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You do know that those who file initial unemployment claims were just recently participating in the labor force?
You do realize that people who cannot find jobs and who's unemployment run out are not counted in the unemployment numbers.
If the economy was doing well the labor participation rate would not be at 40-50 year lows.
If the economy was doing well people would not be underemployed, working at Starbucks when 6 years ago they were making 60k a year.
Rents are through the roof in many markets and low-wage workers are squeezed more than ever, which might be why many workers want a minimum wage increase.
You do realize that people who cannot find jobs and who's unemployment run out are not counted in the unemployment numbers.
If the economy was doing well the labor participation rate would not be at 40-50 year lows.
If the economy was doing well people would not be underemployed, working at Starbucks when 6 years ago they were making 60k a year.
Well since you must cling to labor participation, an issue republicans didnt seem to care about while the economy was producing nasty headlines, as a means of coping with good economic news, here's a quick link.
Isn't it interesting that the opposition, no matter which side they're on, declare the unemployment numbers never mean what they seem on the surface.
If it were a GOPer in the Whitehouse, most detractors posting here would be doing the happy dance.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.