Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-12-2014, 03:21 AM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,131,904 times
Reputation: 12100

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ahzzie View Post
I amuses me every time I read one of these threads by a global warming denialist. It amuses me because with every post they reveal just how little they understand the science behind climate change.
It amuses me every time I read a warmer thread. It shows how they take theory beyond theory and postulate it as fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-12-2014, 03:36 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,607 posts, read 26,241,061 times
Reputation: 12631
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post
The author of your source lists their name as "Poker."

According to real sources like the EPA, "Average global temperatures are expected to increase by 2°F to 11.5°F by 2100, depending on the level of future greenhouse gas emissions."

Future Climate Change | Climate Change | US EPA

Blah, blah, blah,...

Click image for larger version

Name:	CMIP5-global-LT-vs-UAH-and-RSS.png
Views:	222
Size:	106.8 KB
ID:	131249


...and his name is David M. Hoffer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2014, 03:43 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,607 posts, read 26,241,061 times
Reputation: 12631
[quote=chad3;35200143]


97% of all climate scientists say man made global warming is happening.
Climate Change: Consensus














Do you know where the "97% of all climate scientists" number comes from?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2014, 04:29 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,635,138 times
Reputation: 2522
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Blah, blah, blah,...

Attachment 131249


...and his name is David M. Hoffer.
The name David M. Hoffer does not appear on your source.

Why did you post that out of context nonsense?

Last edited by chad3; 06-12-2014 at 04:48 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2014, 04:32 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,635,138 times
Reputation: 2522
[quote=momonkey;35200260]
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post


97% of all climate scientists say man made global warming is happening.
Climate Change: Consensus














Do you know where the "97% of all climate scientists" number comes from?
My source came from NASA.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2014, 05:20 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,607 posts, read 26,241,061 times
Reputation: 12631
[quote=chad3;35200366]
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post

My source came from NASA.

Climate Change: Consensus



Guess again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2014, 05:25 AM
 
Location: Allendale MI
2,523 posts, read 2,194,661 times
Reputation: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Blah, blah, blah,...

Attachment 131249


...and his name is David M. Hoffer.


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2014, 05:31 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 18,982,000 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
The effects of global warming have been quite obvious for thousands of years. Have you read about the ice age?
Not until algore and obama proclaim that it happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2014, 05:35 AM
 
Location: Houston
5,993 posts, read 3,711,085 times
Reputation: 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwruckman View Post
The Earth and Venus are about the same size, made up of mostly the same stuff and both lie in the Suns so called Goldilocks zone for a g-class star like the Sun (as does Mars). The only difference is that Earth suffered a fenderbender with a 5th terrestrial planet (often called Thea), this crash rearranged Earth, created the Moon set the Earth spinning like a billiard ball and added iron to the Earths core making it big enough to have a liquid iron shell around the core. Giving the Earth a powerful magnetic field and safely shieldiong us from nasty radiation from space and the sun and prevented the loss of its atmospheric gases like Mars or hydrogen like Venus. The amount of carbon is the same in both Venus and the Earth the problem is its almost all in gaseous form of CO2 and CO in the case of Venus. If Earth hadnt by wacked by Thea, Venus and the Earth would likely be fraternal twins both Hot and lifeless and life never would have survived here. That we are here and Earth is an abode of live is one of those flukes maybe not repeated within thousands of light years of distance. Just how rare is Earth?
Large impacts are not unique to Earth. Venus also experienced them during the Hadean eon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2014, 05:39 AM
 
Location: Allendale MI
2,523 posts, read 2,194,661 times
Reputation: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwruckman View Post
The Earth and Venus are about the same size, made up of mostly the same stuff and both lie in the Suns so called Goldilocks zone for a g-class star like the Sun (as does Mars). The only difference is that Earth suffered a fenderbender with a 5th terrestrial planet (often called Thea), this crash rearranged Earth, created the Moon set the Earth spinning like a billiard ball and added iron to the Earths core making it big enough to have a liquid iron shell around the core. Giving the Earth a powerful magnetic field and safely shieldiong us from nasty radiation from space and the sun and prevented the loss of its atmospheric gases like Mars or hydrogen like Venus. The amount of carbon is the same in both Venus and the Earth the problem is its almost all in gaseous form of CO2 and CO in the case of Venus. If Earth hadnt by wacked by Thea, Venus and the Earth would likely be fraternal twins both Hot and lifeless and life never would have survived here. That we are here and Earth is an abode of live is one of those flukes maybe not repeated within thousands of light years of distance. Just how rare is Earth?
Since Mars might have been Earth like in the past probably not as rare as you think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top