Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What I am saying is that if those like yourself, who say abortion is "murder," were truly motivated by a desire to save children, they would have a plan for how to keep those children alive, healthy and happy after they were born. But they have no such plan. This suggests to me that they are not motivated by a genuine desire to save children. More likely, they are motivated by a desire to control women.
This appears to be a case of the appeal to motive fallacy.
3. These debates always degenerate into men saying they should be allowed to impregnate women and then just walk away, leaving her holding the bag.
If you don`t want us to have control of your sperm, stop giving it to us.
1. And this is similar to what politically anti-abortion people tell women.
2. Condoms and vasectomies are not 100% efficient/effective. However, I am very interested in getting castrated; thus, it would be very nice if you showed me an easy way to get this done.
3. You are aware that, except in cases of rape, females have just as much say in regards to whether or not sex occurs as a male does, correct? One can just as easily state that if a female does not want to risk her partner becoming a "deadbeat dad", then she shouldn't let a fertile male stick his d*ck inside of her in the first place. After all, there are the options of having sex with trans-men, having lesbian sex, and having other kinds of sex with fertile males which do not involve sticking a d*ck into a vagina.
1. Anytime you present an argument that states that women are nothing more than incubators you are controlling someones body.
2. I have also found that the vast majority of anti abortion people tend to come from the same stock that consistently votes against matters involving women's rights and equality.
1. Yep, and likewise, anytime you present an argument in favor of the draft you are controlling someone's body.
2. This appears to be a case of the argumentum ad hominem fallacy.
There is the Reductio ad Hitlerum fallacy, but this fallacy does not state that any reference to Hitler is invalid.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
