Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 22 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,551 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6033
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute
Rape isn't sex -- it's power. Bill Clinton raped Juanita Brodderick because a rapist isn't looking for consentual sex, for a rapist like Bill Clinton, it's all about power and domination. They prefer rape. You liberals have a very weird idea about rape just being about getting girlfriends.
Just like he was always lurking in the White House hallways preying on young interns and got at least one to do his bidding.
I love how in one forum, Republicans can argue this, even though all that was ever made was a claim, while in another forum argue that ZImmerman is innocent , LOL.
Rape isn't sex -- it's power. Bill Clinton raped Juanita Brodderick because a rapist isn't looking for consentual sex, for a rapist like Bill Clinton, it's all about power and domination. They prefer rape. You liberals have a very weird idea about rape just being about getting girlfriends.
Just like he was always lurking in the White House hallways preying on young interns and got at least one to do his bidding.
Juanita Brodderick is a brainwashed girl. Her original statement was unwelcome sexual advances, and then she changed it to rape later. It is obvious somebody gave her the idea of a lumpsum. At this point of time in history, people were confusing rape with sex. Rape is when you use extreme physical force against a person, to gain entry. Like if somebody physically assaults another person, or uses a weapon of some sort. Nothing like that ever occured to her at all. They had some sex, and when he was running, saw her chance to look important, because of a disagreement between both of them.
If a dude didn't go for it, chance is that nobody would lose their virginity, nobody would have sex at all. We would be like the school shooters, and extremest out their. The idea of planned parenting/Birth control, was to prevent terrible self mutilation of women. Not to prevent people from having sex. The state of sexual freedoms, in a nutshell.
Bush Sr (voted out after 1 term)
Clinton
"W"
Obama
Clinton presidency was the last time US was doing good. "W" was all about war and economic disaster, and Obama years have been all about trying to crawl back out of the hole.
Bush was all about economic disaster. It's interesting how Obama is not responsible for the economic problems we have now because he was just left with Bush's mess. But somehow the economic problems during Bush's administration have nothing to do with Clinton. And the boom times during Clinton's administration have nothing to do with Reagan.
When a Democrat is in office and times are bad, then we really need to understand how economies don't change overnight. But when a Republican is in office and times are bad, it's because he's a Republican.
I love how in one forum, Republicans can argue this, even though all that was ever made was a claim, while in another forum argue that ZImmerman is innocent , LOL.
A claim from a woman who came out of the woodwork and said he raped her 30 years ago but couldn't remember when exactly and never reported it and then went to raise money for Clinton afterwards even though she hated him.
You got that right, and if he could run again I would even go back to voting to vote for him again!
and BTW, It was Nixson,then Reagan,and the Bush's who got all kissy-kissy with China,all Republicans! Don't blame that freakin idiocy on the Democrats!
He has lead an exemplary life since leaving the White House. He's done a lot of good in this world, when he could have sat back and painted pictures of his toes in the bathtub.
In all honesty, we have had pretty poor presidents the past 25 years. Perhaps Bill Clinton is the best of the worst? There are only 4 presidents the past 25 years.
Yes Bill Clinton's presidency had the booming growth of the internet and the Baby Boomers in their peak spending years, both of which helped spur the economy. However, both of these would have happened no matter who was in office.
Let's look at Clinton's actions and record with the economy.
1) Granting permanent most favored nation status to China for trade. The result has been increased trade deficit and increased outsourcing. Clinton viciously attacked anyone who claimed what did happen would happen. Even some liberals are now recognizing this damage.
2) The GOP congress and Clinton deregulated by repealing Glass-Stegall. Clinton was "proud" to sign this bill into law, had vocalized years before that he would support the action, and encouraged Democrats to vote for it. Obama has blamed this for the current mess we are in.
3) Enacting NAFTA with bipartisan support. Many people feel as if this hurt the economy and made many Mexican farmers unemployed, some of which moved here.
4) The Housing Bubble started in 1998. Policies in the 1990s allowed this to happen. Bush can be blamed for allowing it to grow bigger and not cleaning it up (it still isn't cleaned up), but it was born in the Clinton presidency.
5) The NASDAQ Dot Com Bubble burst right before he left office. This index still hasn't recovered to its high. The government encouraged this bubble under Clinton's leadership.
6) The Bush Sr. recession ended before he took office and he left a recession for the next president that started 6 weeks into GWB's term.
7) There was no surplus that was passed to the next president, this myth was a rosy projection that assumed absurdly large growth, no NASDAQ bubble, and no housing bubble.
8) Every Fiscal Year under Clinton saw a rise in the national debt, the "surplus" was from spending several government program money now.
Bill Clinton's presidency contributed to today's economic woes.
I would have to agree with you to some extent: and we do need to remember: 1-name recognition: he is always out there in front of the cameras; young people do not remember any Pres. before him and most don't even really know much about him plus NBC poll may or may not be biased. I am not saying it was, but it may have been. Still all in all, it boils down to his being out there all the time.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Don't blame that freakin idiocy on the Democrats!
