Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-15-2014, 09:16 PM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,664,841 times
Reputation: 9174

Advertisements

The collapse of the economy started when Clinton was in office.

No getting around it. Spin all you want, but fact is fact. Those who own businesses know that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-15-2014, 09:17 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,191,594 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix C View Post
Young(28 and under) folk at work love him. Especially the women. You know budget surplus and all that.


there was a deficit, that means that there was never any such animal as a surplus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2014, 09:25 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,962,294 times
Reputation: 7315
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Many Democrats, including Obama blame Clinton's deregulation of the banks for economic problems.

Many Democrats, including Obama blame outsourcing, something that Clinton policies sped up.

Many Democrats, including Obama blame a growing trade deficit, something that Clinton policies sped up.

Many Democrats blame the housing bubble, that formed in part to policies under Clinton.

Many Democrats blame China into the WTO, thanks Clinton!

etc...

They can, but outsourcing has been happening for decades. My employer has done it on occasion, with presidents from both parties. We do NOT care about which party is in power. If its cheaper to outsource, we'll do it. If not, we won't.

I want our products, both my employer's and the stuff I buy personally, to be sourced in the most efficient way, no matter what part of the globe supplies it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 01:59 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles, California
4,373 posts, read 3,227,364 times
Reputation: 1041
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
I know Hillary dismisses these nearly 2 dozen women who have come forward over a time range of 4 decades as bimbos.

I agree with what Democrat McCaskill said. She said that she wouldn't leave her daughter alone with Clinton for obvious reasons.

1 woman accusing you of rape, sexual assault, or harassment might be a mistake or frame job by the woman...when you are talking, not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7, etc... and women coming forward in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s... Women who came forward BEFORE he was famous. Women known to be life-long Democrats. Women who helped him campaign. Where there is smoke there is fire.

At some point it is extremely naive and detrimental to society to insist all of these women are just bimbos. Where is your point - 3 dozen women?
Answer me this - has Bill Clinton been convicted of rape, yes or no?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 02:22 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,189,163 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
In all honesty, we have had pretty poor presidents the past 25 years. Perhaps Bill Clinton is the best of the worst? There are only 4 presidents the past 25 years.

Yes Bill Clinton's presidency had the booming growth of the internet and the Baby Boomers in their peak spending years, both of which helped spur the economy. However, both of these would have happened no matter who was in office.

Let's look at Clinton's actions and record with the economy.

1) Granting permanent most favored nation status to China for trade. The result has been increased trade deficit and increased outsourcing. Clinton viciously attacked anyone who claimed what did happen would happen. Even some liberals are now recognizing this damage.

2) The GOP congress and Clinton deregulated by repealing Glass-Stegall. Clinton was "proud" to sign this bill into law, had vocalized years before that he would support the action, and encouraged Democrats to vote for it. Obama has blamed this for the current mess we are in.

3) Enacting NAFTA with bipartisan support. Many people feel as if this hurt the economy and made many Mexican farmers unemployed, some of which moved here.

4) The Housing Bubble started in 1998. Policies in the 1990s allowed this to happen. Bush can be blamed for allowing it to grow bigger and not cleaning it up (it still isn't cleaned up), but it was born in the Clinton presidency.

5) The NASDAQ Dot Com Bubble burst right before he left office. This index still hasn't recovered to its high. The government encouraged this bubble under Clinton's leadership.

6) The Bush Sr. recession ended before he took office and he left a recession for the next president that started 6 weeks into GWB's term.

7) There was no surplus that was passed to the next president, this myth was a rosy projection that assumed absurdly large growth, no NASDAQ bubble, and no housing bubble.

8) Every Fiscal Year under Clinton saw a rise in the national debt, the "surplus" was from spending several government program money now.


Bill Clinton's presidency contributed to today's economic woes.
You left out giving nuclear technology to North Korea for "peaceful purposes", and missile targeting technology to China so their MIRVed missles can home in more accurately on American Cities. He makes Benedict Arnold look like a patriot.

Last edited by Bideshi; 06-16-2014 at 03:28 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 03:12 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 17 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,550 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6031
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
In all honesty, we have had pretty poor presidents the past 25 years. Perhaps Bill Clinton is the best of the worst? There are only 4 presidents the past 25 years.

Yes Bill Clinton's presidency had the booming growth of the internet and the Baby Boomers in their peak spending years, both of which helped spur the economy. However, both of these would have happened no matter who was in office.

Let's look at Clinton's actions and record with the economy.

1) Granting permanent most favored nation status to China for trade. The result has been increased trade deficit and increased outsourcing. Clinton viciously attacked anyone who claimed what did happen would happen. Even some liberals are now recognizing this damage.
That status didnt happen until a Bill, sponsored by a Republican from Texas, made it official.

Quote:
2) The GOP congress and Clinton deregulated by repealing Glass-Stegall. Clinton was "proud" to sign this bill into law, had vocalized years before that he would support the action, and encouraged Democrats to vote for it. Obama has blamed this for the current mess we are in.
At least you said GOP congress.

Quote:
3) Enacting NAFTA with bipartisan support. Many people feel as if this hurt the economy and made many Mexican farmers unemployed, some of which moved here.
George H.W. Bush signed NAFTA, not Clinton.

Quote:
4) The Housing Bubble started in 1998. Policies in the 1990s allowed this to happen. Bush can be blamed for allowing it to grow bigger and not cleaning it up (it still isn't cleaned up), but it was born in the Clinton presidency.
It wasnt born in the Clinton Presidency at all. President Bush, allowed Banks to borrow money and make loans to degrees those banks knew they couldnt sustain. You could indeed argue that Clinton made it possible for Bush to do what he did, but thats like saying making marijuana legal makes people start smoking.

Quote:
5) The NASDAQ Dot Com Bubble burst right before he left office. This index still hasn't recovered to its high. The government encouraged this bubble under Clinton's leadership.
Oh, that bubble burst long before Clinton left office and eneded before he left office as well



Quote:
6) The Bush Sr. recession ended before he took office and he left a recession for the next president that started 6 weeks into GWB's term.
You are talking about a recession that is so shallow that economist are still debating about whether or not it actually was a recession.

Quote:
7) There was no surplus that was passed to the next president, this myth was a rosy projection that assumed absurdly large growth, no NASDAQ bubble, and no housing bubble.
It wasnt a projection, we indeed had a budget surplus for 4 years. The problem is that a budget surplus is not the same as a monetary surplus and most dont understand that, including you it seems.

Quote:
8) Every Fiscal Year under Clinton saw a rise in the national debt, the "surplus" was from spending several government program money now.
No, the surplus was from proportionally spending less than we had predicted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 05:51 AM
 
26,469 posts, read 15,053,236 times
Reputation: 14617
Quote:
Originally Posted by adiosToreador View Post
Answer me this - has Bill Clinton been convicted of rape, yes or no?
No, he has not been. But things have happened to him. He has been removed from a University for rape.

I answered your question, now answer my question that you dodged.

1 woman accusing you of rape, sexual assault, or harassment might be a mistake or frame job by the woman...when you are talking, not 1 woman, not 2 women, not 3 women, not 4 women, not 5 women, not 6 women, not 7 women, etc... and women coming forward in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s... Women who came forward BEFORE he was famous. Women known to be life-long Democrats. Women who helped him campaign. Where there is smoke there is fire.

At some point it is extremely naive and detrimental to society to insist all of these women are just bimbos. Where is your point, where you admit he has a problem? 3 dozen women?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 06:32 AM
 
26,469 posts, read 15,053,236 times
Reputation: 14617
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
In all honesty, we have had pretty poor presidents the past 25 years. Perhaps Bill Clinton is the best of the worst? There are only 4 presidents the past 25 years.

Yes Bill Clinton's presidency had the booming growth of the internet and the Baby Boomers in their peak spending years, both of which helped spur the economy. However, both of these would have happened no matter who was in office.

Let's look at Clinton's actions and record with the economy.

1) Granting permanent most favored nation status to China for trade. The result has been increased trade deficit and increased outsourcing. Clinton viciously attacked anyone who claimed what did happen would happen. Even some liberals are now recognizing this damage.

2) The GOP congress and Clinton deregulated by repealing Glass-Stegall. Clinton was "proud" to sign this bill into law, had vocalized years before that he would support the action, and encouraged Democrats to vote for it. Obama has blamed this for the current mess we are in.

3) Enacting NAFTA with bipartisan support. Many people feel as if this hurt the economy and made many Mexican farmers unemployed, some of which moved here.

4) The Housing Bubble started in 1998. Policies in the 1990s allowed this to happen. Bush can be blamed for allowing it to grow bigger and not cleaning it up (it still isn't cleaned up), but it was born in the Clinton presidency.

5) The NASDAQ Dot Com Bubble burst right before he left office. This index still hasn't recovered to its high. The government encouraged this bubble under Clinton's leadership.

6) The Bush Sr. recession ended before he took office and he left a recession for the next president that started 6 weeks into GWB's term.

7) There was no surplus that was passed to the next president, this myth was a rosy projection that assumed absurdly large growth, no NASDAQ bubble, and no housing bubble.

8) Every Fiscal Year under Clinton saw a rise in the national debt, the "surplus" was from spending several government program money now.


Bill Clinton's presidency contributed to today's economic woes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
That status didnt happen until a Bill, sponsored by a Republican from Texas, made it official.

At least you said GOP congress.

George H.W. Bush signed NAFTA, not Clinton.



It wasnt born in the Clinton Presidency at all. President Bush, allowed Banks to borrow money and make loans to degrees those banks knew they couldnt sustain. You could indeed argue that Clinton made it possible for Bush to do what he did, but thats like saying making marijuana legal makes people start smoking.



Oh, that bubble burst long before Clinton left office and eneded before he left office as well





You are talking about a recession that is so shallow that economist are still debating about whether or not it actually was a recession.



It wasnt a projection, we indeed had a budget surplus for 4 years. The problem is that a budget surplus is not the same as a monetary surplus and most dont understand that, including you it seems.



No, the surplus was from proportionally spending less than we had predicted.
We've been over this before, and you keep posting lies that I have already proven as lies. Obamabots care not for the truth.


I'll just add some detail to shake out your deceptions, diversions, and lies.


In all honesty, we have had pretty poor presidents the past 25 years. Perhaps Bill Clinton is the best of the worst? There are only 4 presidents the past 25 years.

Yes Bill Clinton's presidency had the booming growth of the internet and the Baby Boomers in their peak spending years, both of which helped spur the economy. However, both of these would have happened no matter who was in office.

Let's look at Clinton's actions and record with the economy.

1) Granting permanent most favored nation status to China for trade. The result has been increased trade deficit and increased outsourcing. Clinton viciously attacked anyone who claimed what did happen would happen. Even some liberals are now recognizing this damage. Clinton pushed for this and attacked the Democrats and Republicans opposing this as in line with the hard line Chinese Army.

Clinton was a primary catalyst for this happening and he signed it into law. Both parties deserve blame, but Clinton was the president that attacked others for opposing...it is his presidential legacy.

Jane White: Bill Clinton's True Legacy: Outsourcer-in-Chief


2) The GOP congress and Clinton deregulated by repealing Glass-Stegall. Clinton was "proud" to sign this bill into law, had vocalized years before that he would support the action, and encouraged Democrats to vote for it. Obama has blamed this for the current mess we are in.

Good point about Obama bashing deregulation, but embracing Clinton on the economy...AND of course Clinton bashing deregulation that he signed into law. To save Obama, Clinton ignores his own deregulation moves | Fox News

Previously restricted papers show that Clinton's advisers were pushing for and asking for deregulation, no wonder Clinton pushed for it and urged Democrats to vote for it: Wall Street deregulation pushed by Clinton advisers, documents reveal | World news | theguardian.com



3) Enacting NAFTA with bipartisan support. Many people feel as if this hurt the economy and made many Mexican farmers unemployed, some of which moved here.

Bush signed NAFTA, but it wasn't finalized and didn't actually become law.....until.....

Bill Clinton signed NAFTA into law on December 8, 1993. You can read Clinton's remarks on signing NAFTA into law here: Remarks on the Signing of NAFTA (December 8, 1993)

What is this here? Oh why, it is Clinton campaigning for president in support of NAFTA! Ross Perot opposed NAFTA.





4) The Housing Bubble started in 1998. Policies in the 1990s allowed this to happen. Bush can be blamed for allowing it to grow bigger and not cleaning it up (it still isn't cleaned up), but it was born in the Clinton presidency.

Edward Pinto: Acorn and the Housing Bubble - WSJ

Here a government publication argues there are two main theories for when it started, late 1990s under Clinton or 2002 early under Bush as a result of the technology bubble under Clinton. http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2010/12/art1full.pdf


5) The NASDAQ Dot Com Bubble, aka the technology bubble, it burst right before he left office. This index still hasn't recovered to its high. The government encouraged this bubble under Clinton's leadership.

In March 10, 2000, under Clinton the NASDAQ hit its all time high of over 5,400. It has never regained its peak. It is currently at 3,760 today. It is a lie to keep insisting that it has recovered, especially recovered under Clinton, as it continued to fall under Bush's first year in office.

Nasdaq 5,000: Ten years after the dot-com peak - CNET




6) The Bush Sr. recession ended before he took office and he left a recession for the next president that started 6 weeks into GWB's term. This recession clearly existed, it may have been a small one, but it existed. We had declining industrial investment and many leading indicators were down in the summer of 2000 (under Clinton).

The 2001 recession revisited | Econbrowser

Bush inherited Clinton's recession - CNN iReport


7) There was no surplus that was passed to the next president, this myth was a rosy projection that assumed absurdly large growth, no NASDAQ bubble, and no housing bubble. The last Fiscal Year that Clinton had, added 133 Billion to the national debt, and this would naturally get worse as you add in the fall out from the NASDAQ Bubble and recession gift wrapped for GWB to inherit.

US National debt by year, per Treasury Dept.
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/r...ebt_histo4.htm

http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/r...ebt_histo5.htm


8) Every Fiscal Year under Clinton saw a rise in the national debt, the "surplus" was from spending several government program money now.



Bill Clinton's presidency contributed to today's economic woes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 12:00 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,962,294 times
Reputation: 7315
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Let's look at Clinton's actions and record with the economy.

1) Granting permanent most favored nation status to China for trade. Excellent!

2) The GOP congress and Clinton deregulated by repealing Glass-Stegall. Bi-partisan insanity

3) Enacting NAFTA with bipartisan support. Excellent!

4) The Housing Bubble started in 1998. Policies in the 1990s allowed this to happen. Bush can be blamed for allowing it to grow bigger and not cleaning it up (it still isn't cleaned up), but it was born in the Clinton presidency.
Bi-partisan insanity



6) The Bush Sr. recession ended before he took office and he left a recession for the next president that started 6 weeks into GWB's term. This recession clearly existed, it may have been a small one, but it existed. We had declining industrial investment and many leading indicators were down in the summer of 2000 (under Clinton). A very tiny recession-Ho hum


7) There was no surplus that was passed to the next president, this myth was a rosy projection that assumed absurdly large growth, no NASDAQ bubble, and no housing bubble. The last Fiscal Year that Clinton had, added 133 Billion to the national debt, and this would naturally get worse as you add in the fall out from the NASDAQ Bubble and recession gift wrapped for GWB to inherit. Just $133 B -Excellent!



.
My responses in bold above!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Miami, FL
8,087 posts, read 9,832,165 times
Reputation: 6650
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
there was a deficit, that means that there was never any such animal as a surplus.
I know. But that is part of his Legend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top