Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Too bad Bush couldn't predict the major cluster**** that would be the result of him invading Iraq in the first place. We wouldn't be having this conversation if he had any intelligent insight whatsoever.
THose must be some dumb idiot senators then...and those you are calling stuipd are who you want for the next prez...hiliary...
So that's why he signed the agreement with the Iraq to remove all US troops? So he was right before he was wrong, but only wrong because the withdrawal he approved happened under Obama, right?
So that's why he signed the agreement with the Iraq to remove all US troops? So he was right before he was wrong, but only wrong because the withdrawal he approved happened under Obama, right?
Apparently we should stay there until the Sunnis and Shiites make nice and forget their centuries old bloody feud. Should have gone with the Biden partition plan.
So that's why he signed the agreement with the Iraq to remove all US troops? So he was right before he was wrong, but only wrong because the withdrawal he approved happened under Obama, right?
Well..if you listen to the left, you would consider yourself correct, however, you are wrong. bush wanted to leave a force of 10ish thousand troops...obama said no....
So that's why he signed the agreement with the Iraq to remove all US troops? So he was right before he was wrong, but only wrong because the withdrawal he approved happened under Obama, right?
Remember:
1) The war is somehow Obama's fault, even though he didn't vote to start it. Bush, however, will never be blamed because he's a saint and somehow blaming Bush is "letting Obama off the hook" even though there is literally nothing that could have been done to prevent the current outcome once the war started and Saddam fell.
2) If we leave Iraqi on schedule, it is "Obama's fault we're giving up the gains we made." Nobody can define those gains, aside from lining the pockets of Halliburton and Cheney, but that's okay.
3) If we stay in Iraqi or send more troops, it is "Obama's fault we're wasting money on this war." It is never Bush's fault since the war was perfectly affordable then for reasons nobody can define.
It is always Obama's fault, and even though those on the far-right cannot come up with ANY answer to the question regarding what SHOULD be done, they will consistently whine about everything Obama does, even if that means doing a 180 on their supposed viewpoints in less than a week. Just look around this forum for people grumbling about how "weak" he was for not sending troops, and how how the same people are complaining that he is sending troops. It would be funny, except these flip-floppers get to vote.
Point me to the "right wing pundits and posters" that have access to the 1) President's Daily Brief, 2)White House Situation Room, 3) Congressional committees on Intelligence, and 4)CIA and NSA intelligence gathering methods/reports.
LOL. Not having that access has never stopped them from second-guessing the White House up to now. Why should this time be different?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
