Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 07-08-2014, 06:15 PM
 
Location: In exile
534 posts, read 904,372 times
Reputation: 1402

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Christine, it's very Glen Beck of you to try to portray the entire group of people you disagree with as crackpots and whackos.
I was responding to someone who believes that an ongoing conspiracy exists. I made that post to him and not the majority of reasoned, thinking people; you were left out, I trust you aren't claiming membership in a doom bunker society.

 
Old 07-08-2014, 06:16 PM
 
Location: In exile
534 posts, read 904,372 times
Reputation: 1402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Didn't know you were such a big fan of Monsanto, wall street and oil companies.
Your math is a little loose on this post, don't you think?
 
Old 07-08-2014, 06:18 PM
 
Location: In exile
534 posts, read 904,372 times
Reputation: 1402
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiseManOnceSaid View Post
If you look at all of the OP's posts, they are done in a taunting fashion. She/He is trying to stir up conversations simply for the sake of winning the $500 while belittling the politically opposed individuals here on C/D.
Oh I forgot, should I be graced with the winnings, I pledge to spend it on your GED, it's what caring progressives do.
 
Old 07-08-2014, 08:49 PM
 
Location: Oceania
8,610 posts, read 7,888,561 times
Reputation: 8318
Is the topic of this thread so relevant it is still alive? It should have been closed over the weekend as so many others are.

My question to the OP?

Why are you concerned about how/where/why one defends their liberties?

You are doing so from behind your keyboard. Freedom of speech is still a liberty, correct? Why not take to the streets and protest?
 
Old 07-08-2014, 08:59 PM
 
741 posts, read 914,392 times
Reputation: 1356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry10 View Post
Who said that RTBA is anachronistic? First, I would argue that 200 years is not that long time, in the history of civilized nations. Their legal frameworks, their cultures, their attitudes have been formed for over 1000 years.

Yet, if you want to talk for 100 arbitrary years, we can. I actually spent two years in high-school in Romania during their Socialist days. I got immersed into that culture, education, and life, and I made some great friends. Several of my high-school friends, while later in college, participated in the Romanian Revolution which overthrew Socialism by force and blood. That was only 24 years ago.

One got murdered by the Tyrannical regime opening fire on the demonstrators. Regime also used tanks to fight their unarmed enemies - students and other regular folks with "kids and mortgage". Later, Revolution caught up with the Socialist Leader, Ceausescu and executed him.

Romania was not the only country that a tyrannical regime used arms, against an unarmed populace. In Romania students succeeded in overthrowing Socialism. In China, they didn't.

Recent history is filled with cases. I won't even go back 60 years, let alone 100 years.

First, RTBA is a legal reality in our Constitutional system. Secondly, you cannot tell me that it will never be necessary. History has proven otherwise.




First, naivite is not born out of life experiences, and study of history. In fact, it is born of the opposite -- blindness to the realities, and ignorance of history.




Large body? The only way for you to put some credibility into this statement is to reference UNBIASED sources.

But, even if it was true -- isn't intelligence and rationality on guns fully dependent on point of view?

Even more, who says that a "large body" of intelligent and so-called rational people cannot be wrong?

If there was a majority for gun control, which there aren't, who says that majority is intelligent and right, and the dissenters are wrong?

Lastly, we are supposed to be a Constitutional Republic. Many things are not up for vote. Constitution is not up for vote everytime.

There is a process to change it -- constitutional amendments -- which is how a civil society should operate.
Based on your history in this thread, I knew the inevitable multi-quote nightmare was coming, but just to clear things up, such posts are stupid and imply that you're trying to maintain an indefensible position via flailing around in an array of schizophrenic asides and tangents.

If you can't summarize your position in a succinct and flowing manner that makes sense, I have no interest whatsoever discussing anything in that idiotic 'multiquote' fashion in the same way I don't care to try and have a discussion with the bearded kook in the park screaming at the squirrels.

So, the above disjointed mess of digressions and illogica:

Your experiences in Romania are as relevant as mine in Africa. The case for gun rights is hugely anachronistic if the only context you can provide is 200 years ago, or somewhere in the developing world and/or the chaos that ensued immediately post iron curtain. I realize that those things seem like compelling anecdotes to you-and we're all entitled to choose what persuades us- but by more rational and measured standards, they are not compelling enough to justify 'what we have' in terms of the gun situation in the USA.

As far as 'large body of people' and UNBIASED SOURCES!!, you have the internet. I don't need to lead you down this garden path, do I? Right or wrong, the American public is pretty clear on a few things. You don't have to like them but if your choice is to only hear what comes from the Fox News echo chamber, you're just as misguided and misinformed as those on the left with MSNBC.

We both totally agree that the Constitution isn't up for a vote, but then again, you're the one who implied it's the amendment that 'defends the others', then immediately backed off that and reverted to 'civil governance' once someone called bull**** on that uniquely impotent brand of sabre rattling that comes from the gun camp cheap and easy on the internet, but a loser in a discussion about actually effecting real world change.

THE SECOND AMENDMENT PROTECTS FREEDOM!

Then where has it been for all these laws that have been passed to undermine freedom?

Uh, well, uh...THE POLITICAL PROCESS IS FOR ALL THAT STUFF! THE SECOND AMENDMENT WAS WRITTEN SO THE PEOPLE COULD HAVE GUNS IN CASE THE GOVERNMENT EVER CAME FOR THEIR GUNS!!


Last edited by Zaba; 07-08-2014 at 09:03 PM.. Reason: quotw
 
Old 07-08-2014, 09:04 PM
 
Location: In exile
534 posts, read 904,372 times
Reputation: 1402
Default It lives on because you return

Quote:
Originally Posted by armory View Post
Is the topic of this thread so relevant it is still alive? It should have been closed over the weekend as so many others are.

My question to the OP?

Why are you concerned about how/where/why one defends their liberties?

You are doing so from behind your keyboard. Freedom of speech is still a liberty, correct? Why not take to the streets and protest?
The public must demand such a thread or it would surely die, yes?
 
Old 07-08-2014, 09:05 PM
 
Location: Oceania
8,610 posts, read 7,888,561 times
Reputation: 8318
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiseManOnceSaid View Post
Have you checked your mattress for listening devices? You might be under surveillance!

Seriously though,
What happened with Glen Becks discovery of FEMA death camps?
Where is the army of Obama operatives going door to door to take weapons?
Have you been audited by the IRS as part of a dirty tricks campaign?
Has the UN taken over control of your city yet?
Have you seen military vehicles on the roads in preparation for a coup?
Has anyone ever been a victim of fluoridation?
Do you have a communist political officer approving your travel from one town to the next?
Do you have to show papers to enter a market?

Just a few of the many questions no one seems to ask...

Is this an absence in your eyes?
A lot of your questions will be answered within a generation.

As far as the UN taking over your city...It has already started through Agenda 21.

ICLEI: When they say local they mean it - DEMOCRATS* AGAINST* U. N.* AGENDA* 21
 
Old 07-08-2014, 11:04 PM
 
Location: Charleston, SC
7,103 posts, read 5,979,144 times
Reputation: 5712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christinerica View Post
Oh I forgot, should I be graced with the winnings, I pledge to spend it on your GED, it's what caring progressives do.
Sadly, another assumption as to who your audience is.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top