Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-12-2014, 12:41 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,933,813 times
Reputation: 11790

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GolfProfessional View Post
"Dubya" is a slang term for Mr. President Bush used by anti-Americans and/or terrorists who care to show disrespect to our nation.
Obozo, Loser-in-Chief, etc., aren't?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-12-2014, 12:47 AM
 
1,168 posts, read 1,244,629 times
Reputation: 912
Quote:
Originally Posted by GolfProfessional View Post
"Dubya" is a slang term for Mr. President Bush used by anti-Americans and/or terrorists who care to show disrespect to our nation.
Which Mr. President Bush? There are two of them. Be a little more specific
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2014, 12:55 AM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,817,498 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by EuroTrashed View Post
Which Mr. President Bush? There are two of them. Be a little more specific
Guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2014, 12:56 AM
 
2,687 posts, read 2,185,320 times
Reputation: 1478
I say $250 billion is sufficient and be sure to ditch the F-35.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2014, 01:24 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,198,461 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Japan can't, and probably won't, because of their WWII past. South Korea not sure. But, we can't let madmen run around like that. There are good dictators and there are bad. You cannot keep a 100% isolationist stance in today's world, especially when you're in the G20
What madmen? I can't think of a single madman in Asia that Japan or S. Korea can't handle on their own.

Moreover, why should American tax money be committed to their defense? What's their commitment to us? Again, these nations will defend themselves if they don't have us to do it for them. It's making me sick to see us spending billions to defend Asian nations that are wealthy as hell.

I'm not implying isolationism. I'm implying self determination. Japan and Korea are more than able to determine their own fates and not rely on the United States maintaining a WW2 defense posture at our expense. If they want us there so badly, then make them pay us for the full cost of their security and the stationing of our troops there. Every dime.

But we can't keep making excuses for keeping troops all over the world while looking for reasons to cut budgets domestically. This imperialist world cop stuff has gotta come to an end at some point. Might as well be right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2014, 01:35 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,198,461 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
If you're going to send folks into harms way, you darn well better be willing to fund the VA.
Then stop sending troops into harm's way. Americans are too damn militaristic. We think there's always some military solution to problems that actually have their solutions in well thought out diplomacy. Look at our record....we are abject failures at military solutions. That might hurt to digest, but it's the truth.

We're the only first world nation with a citizenry that thinks every panacea for foreign dustups can be found on the other side of a military engagement.

It's ridiculous.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GolfProfessional View Post
"Dubya" is a slang term for Mr. President Bush used by anti-Americans and/or terrorists who care to show disrespect to our nation.
Nonsense. The term was affectionately used by his own supporters. The term seems rather anodyne to me but whatever.,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2014, 01:47 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,483,709 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
....what's wrong with going back to that number?

Who exactly are we planning to go to war against with these Cold War annual defense budgets?
uhm not quite

uhm no

then 1976 defense budget..............283 billion
the 1980 (carters last year) defense budget 303 billion ....
...would be 874 billion in todays' (constant) dollars

bush1's 1990 409 billion dollar(WAR (desert storm)) budget....744 billion in todays dollars

bush2's 2003 defense budget........404 billion...........522 billion in todays dollars....

our current defense budget.....676 billion

our current budget is smaller than carters peace time budget, smaller than bush1 budget..... in todays' dollars




http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0904490.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2014, 01:50 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,544,279 times
Reputation: 6392
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
....what's wrong with going back to that number?

Who exactly are we planning to go to war against with these Cold War annual defense budgets?
Obama has restarted the Cold War.

Ask him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2014, 01:55 AM
 
Location: where you sip the tea of the breasts of the spinsters of Utica
8,297 posts, read 14,164,711 times
Reputation: 8105
We need to prepare for NKorea and Iran, but not on the conventional level because the threat in the future will be from their nuclear weapons (and not even a direct threat, no one would know where any nukes that hit us came from). Whether we have a half million or quarter million troops, or a new fancy aircraft carrier, or a new fighter jet, is pretty much irrelevant to that kind of warfare.

We could have half the current conventional military and still be safe. What we need is actually much cheaper: high-tech methods to deal with nuclear threats, such as tracking their movements. We could take the savings of cutting back the defense budget and invest it in infrastructure and medical care, or other things that improve life rather than kill or maim people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2014, 02:07 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,198,461 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
uhm not quite

uhm no

then 1976 defense budget..............283 billion
the 1980 (carters last year) defense budget 303 billion ....
...would be 874 billion in todays' (constant) dollars

bush1's 1990 409 billion dollar(WAR (desert storm)) budget....744 billion in todays dollars

bush2's 2003 defense budget........404 billion...........522 billion in todays dollars....

our current defense budget.....676 billion

our current budget is smaller than carters peace time budget, smaller than bush1 budget..... in todays' dollars




U.S. Military Spending, 1946–2009 | Infoplease.com
Nope.

In 2001, we were barely budgeting 300 million.

And the "adjusted for inflation" argument is just an excuse for the normal defenseniks to keep propping up military budgets.

The defense budget should be cut in half AT THE LEAST.

At 700 billion, who are we exactly preparing to fight against? Tell me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Obama has restarted the Cold War.

Ask him.
He has? With whom?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top