Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should we stop sending people/aid to Ebola infected nations?
Yes 92 42.59%
No 95 43.98%
Other 17 7.87%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 216. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-08-2014, 02:48 PM
 
9,408 posts, read 11,929,707 times
Reputation: 12440

Advertisements

Why are you guys bringing mythological deities into this? It has nothing to do with the topic. Knock that crap off.

 
Old 10-08-2014, 02:54 PM
 
Location: Houston, Tx
8,227 posts, read 11,144,476 times
Reputation: 8198
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
So far, Americans being treated for Ebola in the United States have pretty good odds.
Oops!
 
Old 10-08-2014, 02:57 PM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,703,398 times
Reputation: 8798
You may want to do the math to determine the high end of the range of the odds, given a sample of three out of three hundred million. Even if all three die, that still leaves 99.9% success within the confidence interval. DC at the Ridge was not speaking from the standpoint of the inadequate data available on which to base a conclusion (which seems to be how you arrived at your reply), but rather was speaking from the standpoint of the most reliable basis for such assertions - an understanding of our health systems capabilities and the nature of the disease.
 
Old 10-08-2014, 03:15 PM
 
27,137 posts, read 15,310,658 times
Reputation: 12068
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
If they are from one of the West African countries affected by Ebola, they wouldn't be arriving in the United States from Africa. They would be connecting through other airports. And as NUMBING as it may seem, the United States does not have the authority to order other countries to stop flying to the affected nations.



We can refuse entry to those that have Passports that originate in those countries.
 
Old 10-08-2014, 03:16 PM
 
27,137 posts, read 15,310,658 times
Reputation: 12068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
SOUTHCOM is calling for some kind of plan to deal with a potentail Ebola outbreak in Central America... Can you imagine the panicked stampede of sick people coming accross our southern boarder if that happens?



You mean our WIDE open southern border?
 
Old 10-08-2014, 03:25 PM
 
27,137 posts, read 15,310,658 times
Reputation: 12068
Quote:
Originally Posted by weltschmerz View Post
He wasn't treated with ZMapp, like the others were.


As I hear reported there wasn't any left to administer to him and it takes months to produce.


I also hear on the news the new possible case served Court papers to the family.

Last edited by bluesjuke; 10-08-2014 at 03:34 PM.. Reason: incomplete word fixed........ no charge.
 
Old 10-08-2014, 03:32 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,870,989 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke View Post
We can refuse entry to those that have Passports that originate in those countries.
And do what with them? Once they are here, they are here. Do you want to put them in quarantine? Where is your quarantine going to be? In every city with an international airport? Or are you going to put your suspected Ebola virus carrier on another plane with the unsuspecting people on that plane and send them off to another country to be that country's problem? That sounds real responsible.

We can't compel these West African nations to close their borders. They are sovereign nations. We can't compel the airlines serving these countries to simply stop. They aren't American airlines. These are the practical things that policy-makers have to think about. They don't have the luxury of making knee-jerk policies and pretending that there are no consequences.
 
Old 10-08-2014, 03:35 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,870,989 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke View Post
As I hear reported there wasn't any left to administer to him and it takes months to produce.


I also hear on the news the new possible case served Court papers to the family.
Update on the deputy.

Update: Frisco officials say risk is low that sheriff’s deputy who visited Duncan’s apartment has Ebola | Dallas Morning News
 
Old 10-08-2014, 03:36 PM
 
27,137 posts, read 15,310,658 times
Reputation: 12068
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
And do what with them? Once they are here, they are here. Do you want to put them in quarantine? Where is your quarantine going to be? In every city with an international airport? Or are you going to put your suspected Ebola virus carrier on another plane with the unsuspecting people on that plane and send them off to another country to be that country's problem? That sounds real responsible.

We can't compel these West African nations to close their borders. They are sovereign nations. We can't compel the airlines serving these countries to simply stop. They aren't American airlines. These are the practical things that policy-makers have to think about. They don't have the luxury of making knee-jerk policies and pretending that there are no consequences.


Refuse to let them disembark from the aircraft and the countries they are coming in from
won't bring them knowing that.

Let it be known by prior advisement.
 
Old 10-08-2014, 03:37 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,692,234 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
If they are from one of the West African countries affected by Ebola, they wouldn't be arriving in the United States from Africa. They would be connecting through other airports. And as NUMBING as it may seem, the United States does not have the authority to order other countries to stop flying to the affected nations.

Your not quite as bright as you make yourself out to be are you.

You deluding yourself if you think protocols don't exist to stop all passangers on commercial flights entering the US from a specific country
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top