Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-03-2014, 08:03 AM
 
9,879 posts, read 7,996,331 times
Reputation: 2521

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by random_thoughts View Post
And no, I dint think we should go to war over two beheaded journalists: thousand of soldiers and civilians died in this conflict so the number of beheadings is just marginal in the grand scheme of things. One more thing: call off all our journalists from the area.
Totally agree.
If these animals can post videos of beheadings, our journalists can just post articles via online as well.
It's not ike they can't write stories after online conference calls with folks over there.
We all get the jist of what it is like over there anyways. It is a ****hole.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-03-2014, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Plymouth Meeting, PA.
5,720 posts, read 3,231,394 times
Reputation: 3126
too old to enlist. And again, nobody would have to enlist if this was happening under Former President Reagan. the man had iron balls compared to the weak douche nozzle that you people slobber over as your king.

Quote:
Originally Posted by random_thoughts View Post
That's cute, one again, are you and your family going to enlist or you want others to die on your behalf?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 08:33 AM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,024 posts, read 27,423,093 times
Reputation: 15942
Quote:
Originally Posted by FKD19124 View Post
too old to enlist. And again, nobody would have to enlist if this was happening under Former President Reagan. the man had iron balls compared to the weak douche nozzle that you people slobber over as your king.
.. The man had iron balls still need boots on the ground to finish the job for him. No?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,754 posts, read 14,752,946 times
Reputation: 35584
Quote:
Originally Posted by renault View Post
Just as OJ is looking for Nicole's "real killer" out on the golf courses, so Obama is looking for his ISIS strategy.






RIP Steven Sotloff




Exactly. And British Prime Minister Cameron found the beheading of Foley, apparently by a British national, much more important (he cut short his vacation) than Obama, who barely sounded piqued, did.

What everyone's missing is the tiny, tiny print at the bottom of the flag pin that he must be irked to wear every day:

I’m not Bush.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 09:25 AM
jw2
 
2,028 posts, read 3,256,642 times
Reputation: 3386
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
when they start beheading our people, people who are not even military and threaten to take over our country, my thoughts change.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin View Post
You actually believe they have any chance of taking over the United States?
Seriously, you have come to that conclusion after the beheading of two journalists.
Did you feel that same way when Daniel Pearl was decapitated back in 2002.

IMO you are giving them more credit than they deserve.
I agree. ISIS will not be able to do the house-to-house raids in the U.S. with the success they have had in Iraq because so many households here are armed. Not that Obama and Company aren't trying to change that to help ISIS but I think the 2nd Amendment will prevail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 09:30 AM
 
9,879 posts, read 7,996,331 times
Reputation: 2521
Quote:
Originally Posted by jw2 View Post
I agree. ISIS will not be able to do the house-to-house raids in the U.S. with the success they have had in Iraq because so many households here are armed. Not that Obama and Company aren't trying to change that to help ISIS but I think the 2nd Amendment will prevail.
IMO those ISIS guys would not last two days in one of our major cities on the wrong or right side of town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 09:41 AM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 11,949,056 times
Reputation: 7502
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin View Post
IMO those ISIS guys would not last two days in one of our major cities on the wrong or right side of town.


You're probably right. There are some really "nice" parts of Cleveland where there shennanigans wouldn't get them too far.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,727,815 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by FKD19124 View Post
too old to enlist. And again, nobody would have to enlist if this was happening under Former President Reagan. the man had iron balls compared to the weak douche nozzle that you people slobber over as your king.
Are we supposed to invade a hapless Middle East country every time some unhinged Muslim group gets violent? Those extremist religious barbarians want nothing more than to drag the US down in the gutter with them for another barbarian battle.

How about if we use strategic intelligence and solve this problem using 21st century technology and methods?

Remember how Bush tried to get Osama Bin Laden? Compare that to how Obama got Bin Laden.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Plymouth Meeting, PA.
5,720 posts, read 3,231,394 times
Reputation: 3126
we have those.
We did not have to enlist anybody in 1986 when Reagan bombed Ghadafi's compound.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
.. The man had iron balls still need boots on the ground to finish the job for him. No?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,727,815 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by jw2 View Post
I agree. ISIS will not be able to do the house-to-house raids in the U.S. with the success they have had in Iraq because so many households here are armed. Not that Obama and Company aren't trying to change that to help ISIS but I think the 2nd Amendment will prevail.
A house-to-house raid in the US by ISIS? Geeze! You people need to lay off the Fox News!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top